MD Acumen · MRCGP SCA course · free practice resources
MRCGP SCA course · Starter Station A

Starter Station A · Indigestion

A 38-year-old man with six weeks of indigestion wants a scan.

Reviewed and kept current

Video consultation · Undifferentiated presentation · Prescribing · Investigation and results · 12-minute case · 3 min reading · Last editorial review: 11 October 2026 · Next scheduled refresh: 11 April 2027 · Clinical content signed by Course Director, 11 October 2026.

Candidate instructions

Read this as you would outside the room

Read the brief as you would in the examination (RCGP: twelve consultations with simulated patients, each lasting twelve minutes, with 3 minutes' reading at the start of each). There is no reference material. Everything below the brief is folded until the consultation is over.

Information
FrameYou have 3 minutes to read, then 12 minutes. Video consultation. Everything below this brief is folded away until the consultation is over.
Your roleSalaried GP at a city practice, holding the afternoon's video list.
PatientDaniel Okafor, 38.
Reason for consultation“Indigestion; wants a scan.” Booked online.
FormatVideo. He is at his desk at work; you can see his face. You cannot examine him; you may ask what he can tell you and arrange examination if needed.

Information available

The records extract, printed as it appears.

Problem listNo significant history.
MedicationNone on repeat. Over-the-counter: omeprazole 20 mg, bought for two months. Allergies: none known.
NurseBMI 29. No blood tests on record for five years.
OccupationIT project manager.

Your task

•
Assess his symptoms.
•
Reach a working diagnosis with the alternatives you have considered.
•
Agree a plan, including an answer to his request for a scan.
•
Address his concerns.
Folded away

For the role player and the observer

Open these after the consultation, or during it if you are observing. The role-player script and every marking section are public (D-76): this is practice material, not an examination.

1 · Role-player script — opening line, story, ICE, hidden facts and triggers (examination findings last)

Candidates: do not open until you have consulted.

Persona and manner

  • Daniel Okafor, 38, an IT project manager; pleasant, articulate, slightly impatient; you have done your research online and arrive with a conclusion. You check your watch once at minute four; you have a meeting after this.
  • Not hostile. If the doctor listens, you soften quickly and become collaborative.

Opening line (verbatim)

  • “I've had this burning in my chest and stomach for about six weeks, the omeprazole from the chemist helps a bit, and I really think I need a scan to be safe.”

The story

  • “A burning pain high in my stomach and behind the breastbone, worse after meals and when I lie down at night.”
  • “Bloating and belching after eating. It feels like a brick in there.”
  • “The omeprazole from the chemist takes the edge off but it comes back.”
  • If asked: no difficulty swallowing; food does not stick; no vomiting; no weight loss, “if anything I've gained”; no black stools; no blood.
  • If asked about painkillers: ibuprofen most days for a gym shoulder injury, about eight weeks, two or three tablets a day, from a big pack.
  • Alcohol: four or five pints on Friday and Saturday, wine with dinner two or three nights in the week; about 25 units. You under-estimate at first (“a few pints”) and correct yourself if asked to count.
  • Coffee: five cups a day, mostly before lunch. You smoke socially, perhaps five a week.
  • Sleep poor, waking at three. Work has been brutal: a deadline and two colleagues off sick.
  • Your father “had stomach problems”; on gentle questioning, an ulcer at 60, treated with tablets, no cancer.
  • No previous camera test; no previous test for the stomach bug; no aspirin or steroids.

Ideas, concerns and expectations

  • Idea: “An ulcer like my dad's, or something worse.”
  • Concern: Cancer. “You read things.” You say the word only if asked what worries you most.
  • Expectation: A scan, or “the camera”, so you can stop worrying. You do not know which; you want the reassurance a test would give.

Impact

  • Work: a project deadline; “running on caffeine and adrenaline”.
  • Home: you live with your partner; no children.
  • Gym: the shoulder injury is a real frustration; you have not trained for a month.

Red flags

  • Absent: No dysphagia, no weight loss, no vomiting, no haematemesis, no melaena, no anaemia symptoms; under 55; no previous ulcer or surgery.

Hidden facts and their triggers

  • The daily ibuprofen for the shoulder — released only if asked about painkillers, or if the doctor follows the shoulder cue
  • The true alcohol total — released only if asked to count the drinks
  • Your father's ulcer — released only if asked about the family
  • The cancer fear — released only if asked what worries you most
  • The poor sleep and the deadline — released only if the doctor picks up “knackered”

Behaviour

  • Minute 2: as an aside, “…and I'm just knackered all the time, to be honest.” Do not repeat it unless the doctor picks it up.
  • Minute 5: rub your right shoulder and mention the gym injury. This opens the ibuprofen line if the doctor is curious.
  • If the doctor explains that there are no warning features, proposes a test for the stomach bug, a course of a stronger stomach tablet, stopping the ibuprofen with something else for the shoulder, cutting the alcohol and coffee, and explains why a camera test is not needed now and what would change that: accept with visible relief and ask, “And if it doesn't work?”
  • If the doctor refers for a camera test without any discussion: accept quickly. “Great, thanks.”
  • If the doctor refuses a scan without explaining why: push back once. “So you're saying it's definitely nothing?” Then subside.
  • If asked to stop the ibuprofen: ask what you can use for the shoulder instead.

Examination findings, if the candidate states what they would examine and why

  • Video: no examination today. If the candidate states what they would examine and why: no tenderness that you can find pressing your own upper abdomen; no lumps; BMI 29 from the nurse; you look well.
2 · Examiner mark sheet — generic SCA scheme plus the key facts for this case

Domain grades — with the key facts that earn a clear pass at this station

Domain (RCGP wording) · key facts for this caseCF (0)F (1)P (2)CP (3)Score
1 · Data gathering and diagnosis
  • The golden minute allowed; the symptom characterised: site, timing with meals and lying down, the response to the tablet
  • The alarm features asked by name: difficulty swallowing, weight loss, vomiting, blood or black stools; age noted
  • Painkiller use and alcohol quantified, the shoulder cue followed; coffee, smoking, aspirin and steroids
  • What he fears asked and linked to his father's ulcer; what a scan would tell him
☐☐☐☐/3
2 · Clinical management and medical complexity (×1.5)
  • Summarises the picture and checks whether anything has been missed
  • Working diagnosis: uninvestigated indigestion without alarm features, driven by the ibuprofen and the alcohol; an ulcer or reflux likely; cancer reasoned against
  • The plan: stop the ibuprofen with an alternative for the shoulder; a stool test two weeks off the acid tablet; a four-week course; alcohol reduced
  • Safety-net for difficulty swallowing, vomiting blood, black stools or weight loss; the camera-test criteria explained; follow-up with the result
☐ (0)☐ (1.5)☐ (3)☐ (4.5)/4.5
3 · Relating to others
  • Explores the request rather than granting or refusing it: what would a scan tell him?
  • Names the cancer fear and answers it with the reasoning
  • Picks up “knackered” and the shoulder; acknowledges the work pressure without lecturing
  • Explains in plain language and checks understanding; owns the decision not to scope
☐☐☐☐/3
Case total/10.5

Global rating (recorded, not added to the total): ☐ Fail ☐ Bare Fail ☐ Bare Pass ☐ Pass

The domain grades (RCGP descriptors): CP clear pass — above the standard of a newly qualified, independent GP · P pass — sufficiently demonstrated at the standard · F fail — insufficiently demonstrated at the standard · CF clear fail — clearly demonstrated below the standard.

The RCGP grades each domain CF, F, P or CP and weights clinical management and medical complexity against the other two domains; the examination's maximum is 126 over twelve cases, which is 10.5 per case. The RCGP does not publish the mark each grade carries. MD Acumen's training sheet uses CF 0 · F 1 · P 2 · CP 3, with clinical management weighted ×1.5 (0 · 1.5 · 3 · 4.5), so that a case is marked out of 10.5 and a twelve-case circuit out of 126. A P in all three domains is 7.0; MD Acumen treats that line as the training standard for a case. The examination's pass mark is set by borderline regression for each diet and is published in the RCGP's diet summary reports; it is not a fixed fraction of 126.

Weighting rationale, in the RCGP's words: “To reflect the capability coverage within the clinical management and medical complexity domain this is weighted in comparison to the other two domains.”

3 · Expanded station standard — what earns a clear pass, pass, fail and clear fail here

Written to the standard of a newly qualified independent GP; the clear-pass row describes practice above that standard. It is a debriefing aid, not a checklist: the grade is a judgement that the essentials, the italic key facts on the mark sheet, were done well, at the patient's pace and in plain language. MD Acumen training standard; the RCGP does not publish case mark sheets.

GradeData gathering and diagnosisClinical management and medical complexityRelating to others
CPLets him speak for the first minute and picks up both cues, the aside about being knackered and the shoulder, and follows each to its management line. Asks the alarm features by name in a run he can follow. Reasons aloud that under 55 with no alarm features is a test-and-treat case, not a camera case. Counts the alcohol with him. Asks what he fears most and what a scan would tell him that would help.Stops the ibuprofen and offers a specific alternative for the shoulder, with physiotherapy or a review. Explains test-and-treat in plain words: the stool test two weeks off the acid tablet, treatment if positive, a full-dose acid suppressant for four weeks meanwhile. Reduces alcohol, coffee and smoking as choices. Explains exactly what would change the decision about a camera test and gives a specific safety-net. Addresses the sleep and the deadline briefly with a plan. Books the follow-up with the result.Treats the request for a scan as a belief to explore, not a demand to grant or refuse, and asks what it would tell him. Names the cancer fear and answers it precisely, using his father's history to reassure accurately. Negotiates the ibuprofen and alcohol changes as his choices. Acknowledges the work pressure without lecturing. Explains without jargon and checks understanding. Owns the decision not to scope and says what would change it.
PAllows the golden minute. Asks the red flags: dysphagia, weight loss, vomiting, bleeding or melaena. Quantifies the NSAID use and the alcohol. Elicits the ideas, concerns and expectations and links them to the father's ulcer. Asks about aspirin, steroids and smoking. States a working diagnosis: uninvestigated indigestion, likely acid-related, driven by the ibuprofen and the alcohol.Stops the ibuprofen and offers an alternative for the shoulder. Arranges a stool antigen test for the stomach bug after two weeks off the acid tablet, with treatment if positive. A full-dose acid suppressant for four weeks. Alcohol and caffeine reduction, meals and sleep advice. No camera test now, with the criteria that would change this explained. A specific safety-net: dysphagia, vomiting blood, black stools, weight loss. Follow-up in four to six weeks with the result.Explores the request rather than granting or refusing it, and asks what a scan would tell him. Names the cancer fear when it surfaces and answers it with the reasoning, using his father's history accurately. Explains the plan in plain language and checks understanding. A shared plan in which the ibuprofen and the alcohol changes are his choices; owns the decision not to scope and says what would change it.
FClosed questions from the start; no golden minute. The alcohol or the ibuprofen never asked about, or asked about and not quantified. Both cues missed. No ideas, concerns or expectations, so the cancer fear is never named. Does not ask about the family.Refers for a camera test to be safe with no indication. Or no plan for the stomach bug. Or the acid suppressant repeated with no test and no end date. The ibuprofen left running with no alternative. No safety-net. No follow-up.Interrupts early; talks over him. Grants the scan to end the conversation, or refuses it without explanation, so that he asks whether it is definitely nothing. Jargon: dyspepsia, reflux, Helicobacter as labels. Does not pick up “knackered”. Lectures about the pints.
CFNo history beyond the opening line; the alarm features never asked by name; the painkillers and the alcohol never discovered because neither cue is followed; the father's ulcer never heard; the consultation spent negotiating the scan from the first minute. No working diagnosis stated at the end of twelve minutes, and nothing the examiner can mark as reasoning.Unsafe or absent: an urgent camera referral for a 38-year-old with no alarm features to end the request; or the acid tablet re-issued with the ibuprofen continuing and no test, no safety-net and no review; or a scan refused with nothing offered in its place.Dismissive of the request or collusive with it; no exploration of the fear behind it, so that cancer is never named and never answered; lectures about alcohol and smoking so that he stops contributing; ends without any check of what he has understood or agreed, and with the ibuprofen still in his desk drawer. No partnership and no plan he will follow.

Where candidates lose this station

  • Missing the shoulder cue, so the daily ibuprofen that drives the symptoms is never found (statement D1)
  • Referring for a camera test to be safe, or refusing one without explaining why, instead of exploring what a scan would tell him (statement R2)
  • Prescribing another course of the acid tablet with no test for the stomach bug and no end date (statement C3)

What the examiner is listening for in the last four minutes

By 8:00 the working diagnosis should have been stated: uninvestigated indigestion without alarm features, driven by the ibuprofen and the alcohol. The examiner is listening for: the ibuprofen stopped with an alternative for the shoulder; the stool test two weeks off the acid tablet and the four-week course; the alcohol and coffee as his choices; the reasoning against a camera test now and the criteria that would change it; a safety-net that names difficulty swallowing, vomiting blood, black stools and weight loss; the follow-up with the result; and his own words on the plan.

4 · RCGP feedback statements — where underperformance was identified — with case-specific examples

The ten statements below are postulated: the feedback an examiner would most likely attach at this station, chosen from the RCGP's standardised list of 26 feedback statements that applies to every SCA case and spans the three marking domains (Data Gathering and Diagnosis; Clinical Management and Medical Complexity; Relating to Others). They are a prediction from the case content, its complexity and the marks that matter, not an examiner's record: any statement on the full list can be attached to any case, and feedback plays no part in the mark. Record the statements that applied in the practice log.

RCGP feedback statement (postulated top ten)Underperformance it signals (generic)Station-specific example
D1 · Data gathering was insufficient to enable safe assessment of the condition/situation
Data gathering and diagnosis · Data gathering and interpretation
History too thin to decide safely: the presenting problem not characterised, the essential negatives not asked.
  • Missing the shoulder cue, so the daily ibuprofen that drives the symptoms is never found.
  • Does not ask the alarm features by name.
D2 · Existing information about the case was insufficiently utilised
Data gathering and diagnosis · Data gathering and interpretation; Organisation, management and leadership
The records, results or the referral note not read or not used; questions asked that the notes already answer.
  • Does not read that he has bought omeprazole for two months, so the timing of the stool test is wrong.
  • Misses the BMI and the absence of bloods.
D6 · The implications of relevant findings identified during the data gathering were insufficiently recognised or understood
Data gathering and diagnosis · Data gathering and interpretation
A finding or result is elicited but its meaning is not recognised or not followed up.
  • Hears “I'm just knackered all the time” and lets it go.
  • Hears about ibuprofen most days and does not connect it.
D7 · Differential diagnoses or hypotheses were inadequately generated or tested
Data gathering and diagnosis · Making diagnosis/decisions
One diagnosis assumed; alternatives not generated, or generated but not tested with a question.
  • Assumes reflux and never considers an ulcer from the ibuprofen.
  • Considers cancer and cannot say why it is unlikely.
C2 · The management plan relating to prescribing of medication was inappropriate or not reflective of current practice
Clinical management and medical complexity · Clinical management
A drug started, continued or stopped against current guidance, or without the checks it needs.
  • Re-issues the acid tablet with no end date and the ibuprofen continuing.
  • Prescribes a different painkiller that is also an NSAID.
C3 · The management plan relating to investigations was inappropriate or not reflective of current practice
Clinical management and medical complexity · Clinical management
Investigations ordered without purpose, omitted when needed, or not explained.
  • Prescribing another course of the acid tablet with no test for the stomach bug and no end date.
  • Orders the stool test while he is still taking the acid tablet.
C5 · The plan relating to the medical management of risk was inadequate or inappropriate
Clinical management and medical complexity · Clinical management; Organisation, management and leadership
Clinical risk left unmanaged: no plan for the thing that could go wrong, or the risk not weighed.
  • No safety-net for the symptoms that would need a camera test.
  • No plan if the test is negative and the symptoms continue.
R2 · The person's agenda, health beliefs and/or preferences were insufficiently explored
Relating to others · Communication and consultation skills; Practising holistically, promoting health and safeguarding
What the person thinks is wrong, fears, or wants is not asked, or not used in the plan.
  • Referring for a camera test to be safe, or refusing one without explaining why, instead of exploring what a scan would tell him.
  • Does not ask what worries him most, so cancer is never named.
R4 · Explanations were inadequately shared or adapted for the person's needs
Relating to others · Communication and consultation skills
Explanation in jargon, at the wrong pace, or not adapted to the person's level and concerns.
  • Uses dyspepsia, reflux and Helicobacter without explaining them.
  • Explains test-and-treat so fast that he cannot repeat it.
R7 · Ownership or responsibility for decision-making was inadequate or inappropriate
Relating to others · Fitness to practise; Making diagnosis/decisions; Maintaining an ethical approach
Decisions deferred, delegated or left to the patient when the doctor should own them.
  • Grants the scan to end the conversation.
  • Leaves the decision about the camera test to him.

The full list of 26 statements, with the generic meaning of each, is on the exam and the mark scheme.

5 · Examiner points of fact and guidelines

Points of fact the examiner should have to hand

Each statement is drawn from the named guideline, in its current version, with the date it was checked. The examiner marks against these facts; the candidate is not expected to quote them.

  1. For people with uninvestigated dyspepsia and no alarm features, offer full-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy for four weeks, or test and treat for Helicobacter pylori; review NSAID use, alcohol, smoking and weight; endoscopy is not routinely needed. NICE — CG184 Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management, section 1.3, uninvestigated dyspepsia, 2014, last updated October 2019, checked 10 Oct 2026
  2. Refer people using a suspected-cancer pathway for oesophageal or stomach cancer if they have dysphagia, or are aged 55 and over with weight loss and any of upper abdominal pain, reflux or dyspepsia; consider a non-urgent direct-access endoscopy for people with haematemesis or, at 55 and over, with treatment-resistant dyspepsia, upper abdominal pain with low haemoglobin, or raised platelets with other symptoms. NICE — NG12 Suspected cancer: recognition and referral, section 1.2, upper gastrointestinal tract cancers, 2015, last updated 2025, checked 10 Oct 2026
  3. Test for Helicobacter pylori with a carbon-13 urea breath test or a stool antigen test; the person should not have taken a proton pump inhibitor within two weeks or an antibiotic within four weeks of the test; offer eradication therapy to those who test positive. NICE — CG184 Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management, section 1.5, Helicobacter pylori testing and eradication, 2014, last updated October 2019, checked 10 Oct 2026
  4. NSAIDs are a common cause of dyspepsia and peptic ulcer; stop the NSAID where possible, and if it must continue, offer a proton pump inhibitor alongside it; paracetamol or a topical NSAID are alternatives for musculoskeletal pain. NICE CKS — NSAIDs: prescribing issues, adverse effects: gastrointestinal, current online version, checked 10 Oct 2026
  5. Lifestyle advice for dyspepsia and reflux includes losing weight if overweight, reducing alcohol, caffeine and smoking, smaller and earlier evening meals, and raising the head of the bed for night-time symptoms. NICE CKS — Dyspepsia, unidentified cause, management: lifestyle advice, current online version, checked 10 Oct 2026
  6. The UK Chief Medical Officers' low-risk drinking guideline is not more than 14 units a week spread over three or more days; 25 units a week with most of it on two days is a pattern at which brief advice is indicated. NICE CKS (citing the UK Chief Medical Officers' 2016 guideline) — Alcohol, problem drinking, background: the low-risk drinking guideline and unit calculation, current online version, checked 10 Oct 2026
  7. In CG184 a full-dose proton pump inhibitor is omeprazole 20 mg once daily, lansoprazole 30 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg or rabeprazole 20 mg; low dose is half of this and double dose twice it. If uninvestigated dyspepsia does not respond to a four-week course, the other strategy (test and treat for Helicobacter pylori, or the course if testing came first) is used; if symptoms persist after both, a histamine-2 receptor antagonist is offered, and specialist referral is considered for unexplained or treatment-resistant symptoms at any age. NICE — CG184 Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management, section 1.3, uninvestigated dyspepsia: treatment steps; dose definitions for proton pump inhibitors; section 1.8, referral, 2014, last updated October 2019, checked 10 Oct 2026
  8. First-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori is a seven-day, twice-daily course of a proton pump inhibitor with amoxicillin 1 g and either clarithromycin 500 mg or metronidazole 400 mg; in penicillin allergy, a proton pump inhibitor with clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 400 mg; an antibiotic the person has had before for other infections is avoided. Re-testing after eradication is not routinely offered but is considered where symptoms persist; a second-line course uses the antibiotic not used first time. NICE — CG184 Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management, section 1.5, Helicobacter pylori eradication: first-line and second-line regimens; re-testing, 2014, last updated October 2019, checked 10 Oct 2026
  9. People who need long-term management of dyspepsia symptoms have an annual review and are encouraged to step down to the lowest dose that controls symptoms, or to stop and use treatment as needed; a proton pump inhibitor course is not open-ended. CG184 also asks the GP to review medicines that can cause dyspepsia, for example calcium-channel blockers, nitrates, theophyllines, bisphosphonates, corticosteroids and NSAIDs, and to offer advice on weight, smoking, alcohol, coffee and the timing of meals. NICE — CG184 Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management, section 1.2, common elements of care: medicines that cause dyspepsia; lifestyle; section 1.3, long-term review, 2014, last updated October 2019, checked 10 Oct 2026
  10. NG12 uses faecal immunochemical testing in primary care to guide suspected-cancer referral for colorectal cancer in adults with an abdominal mass, a change in bowel habit or iron-deficiency anaemia, or aged 40 and over with unexplained weight loss and abdominal pain, under 50 with rectal bleeding and abdominal pain or weight loss, 50 and over with rectal bleeding, abdominal pain or weight loss, or 60 and over with anaemia; 10 micrograms of haemoglobin per gram of faeces or more prompts referral. FIT has no place in assessing upper gastrointestinal symptoms. NICE — NG12 Suspected cancer: recognition and referral, section 1.3, lower gastrointestinal tract cancers: faecal immunochemical testing, 2015, last updated 2025, checked 10 Oct 2026
  11. Factors that increase the risk of NSAID-related gastrointestinal bleeding or ulceration include age 65 and over, a history of peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding, a high dose or prolonged use, more than one NSAID, concurrent aspirin, anticoagulants, corticosteroids or SSRIs, Helicobacter pylori infection, heavy alcohol use and smoking. Where an NSAID cannot be stopped in a person with such factors, a proton pump inhibitor is co-prescribed; an NSAID bought over the counter and taken daily for eight weeks is counted as prolonged use. NICE CKS — NSAIDs: prescribing issues, adverse effects: gastrointestinal risk factors; gastroprotection, current online version, checked 10 Oct 2026
  12. The Gastroenterology Topic Guide expects the GP to manage uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary care using test-and-treat and empirical acid suppression, to recognise alarm features and apply the suspected-cancer referral criteria, to review medicines and alcohol as causes, to explain the reasoning for and against endoscopy so that the patient can share the decision, and to arrange follow-up with the result. RCGP — GP curriculum: Gastroenterology, Topic Guide: dyspepsia and reflux; Helicobacter pylori; upper gastrointestinal cancer referral, 2025 curriculum (Being a GP), checked 10 Oct 2026

Working references for this station

IssuerDocumentVersionChecked
NICECG184 Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management2014, last updated October 201910 Oct 2026
NICENG12 Suspected cancer: recognition and referral2015, last updated 202510 Oct 2026
NICE CKSNSAIDs: prescribing issuescurrent online version10 Oct 2026
NICE CKSDyspepsia, unidentified causecurrent online version10 Oct 2026
NICE CKS (citing the UK Chief Medical Officers' 2016 guideline)Alcohol, problem drinkingcurrent online version10 Oct 2026
RCGPGP curriculum, Topic Guides: Gastroenterology · Consulting in general practice · Continuity and quality of care, safety and prescribingBeing a GP, 2025 curriculum10 Oct 2026

12 statements, 731 words. Every statement is signed by the Course Director before it is published; a station whose facts have changed since signature carries no signature line until it is signed again.

6 · RCGP curriculum tags for this case
RCGP curriculum (2025)This case
Topic Guide(s)Gastroenterology · Consulting in general practice · Continuity and quality of care, safety and prescribing
Core capabilitiesCommunicating and consulting · Data gathering and interpretation · Decision-making and diagnosis · Clinical management
SCA Clinical Experience Group(s)New presentation of undifferentiated disease · Prescribing · Investigation / Results
AKT blueprint clinical areaGastroenterology and nutrition (broader representation)
Case typeundifferentiated
Modalityvideo
7 · My marks and reflection — practice log form

Record your three domain grades, your case total out of 10.5, your global rating, the RCGP feedback statements that applied, and what you will keep and change. The form is already labelled with this case and its web address; a copy of your entry is emailed to you, so your practice log builds up in your inbox and can be downloaded.

Record my marks and reflection for SCA-STARTER-A

Revision link for this case: mdacumen.com/sca-startera-indigestion

Independence & scope. Formative training material from MD Acumen Ltd; not a prediction of exam performance. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or delivered on behalf of the Royal College of General Practitioners; the marking domains and feedback statements are the RCGP's published ones, and every descriptor on this page is an Acumen training tool calibrated to them. Clinical content reflects UK guidance at the date of editorial review — always check the current guideline. All patients are fictional.