MD Acumen · MRCGP SCA course · free practice resources
MRCGP SCA course · Station 1

Station 1 · Tiredness

A 42-year-old woman is tired all the time and wants iron tablets; her blood count says more than she does.

Reviewed and kept current

Video consultation · Investigation and results · Gender, reproductive and sexual health · Undifferentiated presentation · 12-minute case · 3 min reading · Last editorial review: 11 October 2026 · Next scheduled refresh: 11 April 2027 · Clinical content signed by Course Director, 11 October 2026.

Candidate instructions

Read this as you would outside the room

Read the brief as you would in the examination (RCGP: twelve consultations with simulated patients, each lasting twelve minutes, with 3 minutes' reading at the start of each). There is no reference material. Everything below the brief is folded until the consultation is over.

Information
FrameYou have 3 minutes to read, then 12 minutes. Video consultation. Everything below this brief is folded away until the consultation is over.
Your roleGP partner at a town-centre practice, holding the results list.
PatientHannah Reeve, 42.
Reason for consultation“Tired all the time; my results.” Booked by the patient after seeing her blood tests on the practice app.
FormatVideo. She is at home at the kitchen table; you can see her face and hands. You cannot examine her today; you may ask what she can show you and arrange what needs to be done in person.

Information available

The records extract, printed as it appears. Results carry units and reference ranges.

Problem listTwo children, 14 and 10. No other entries. Non-smoker.
MedicationNone. Allergies: none recorded. Contraception: none recorded.
Bloods, two weeks ago (requested by telephone for tiredness)Haemoglobin 96 g/L (120–150). MCV 71 fL (80–100). Ferritin 6 micrograms/L (15–200). TSH 2.1 mU/L (0.3–4.2). HbA1c 38 mmol/mol (below 42). Urea, electrolytes, liver function, B12 and folate: within range. Coeliac serology: not sent.
ScreeningCervical screening: overdue by 18 months. Bowel screening: not yet eligible.
Last consultationTelephone, three weeks ago: tiredness; bloods requested.

Your task

•
Explain the results and find out why she is tired.
•
Reach a working diagnosis and its cause, with the alternatives you have considered.
•
Agree a management plan.
•
Address her concerns.
Folded away

For the role player and the observer

Open these after the consultation, or during it if you are observing. The role-player script and every marking section are public (D-76): this is practice material, not an examination.

1 · Role-player script — opening line, story, ICE, hidden facts and triggers (examination findings last)

Candidates: do not open until you have consulted.

Persona and manner

  • Hannah Reeve, 42, a primary-school teaching assistant; pleasant, self-deprecating, tired-looking; you laugh off your symptoms and are keen to be “no trouble”.
  • You have seen the word anaemia on the app and expect iron tablets to fix it; you want to leave with a prescription.
  • You become quieter and more honest when asked about your periods in a matter-of-fact way.

Opening line (verbatim)

  • “I saw my bloods on the app and it says I'm anaemic — I thought so, I'm shattered all the time. Can I just get some iron tablets?”

The story

  • “I've been tired for a year or more, worse in the last few months. I fall asleep on the sofa at eight. I'm breathless carrying the shopping up the stairs, which is new.”
  • “I chew ice all day at work. Everyone thinks I'm mad.” You think it is a funny habit, nothing more.
  • Diet is “fine”: you eat meat, three meals a day.
  • If asked about your periods, matter-of-factly: heavy for two or three years, worse this year. Seven or eight days; on the worst two days you flood through a super tampon and a pad in an hour; clots the size of a 50p piece; you have had to leave work twice. Cycle regular, 26 days.
  • You have never mentioned the periods to a doctor: “My mum was the same. It's just how we are.”
  • No bleeding between periods or after sex; no pelvic pain beyond period cramps; no pressure symptoms.
  • Bowels normal; no blood in the stool; no weight loss; no abdominal pain; no indigestion; appetite unchanged. No nosebleeds or easy bruising.
  • Not pregnant: your husband had a vasectomy. Not trying for children.
  • Family: your mother had a hysterectomy at 45 for heavy periods. No bowel cancer, no thyroid disease in the family.

Ideas, concerns and expectations

  • Idea: “I'm anaemic because I'm run down and busy.” You have not connected the periods to the anaemia.
  • Concern: If pushed: “Is it something serious, like leukaemia? My colleague's husband had that.”
  • Expectation: Iron tablets. You would rather not be referred anywhere.

Impact

  • Work: a new head teacher and an inspection coming; you do not want to be off sick. “I can't be off — we've got Ofsted.”
  • Home: you are asleep before the children's bedtime; your husband does the evenings.
  • Mood: “a bit flat”, low energy; you enjoy things when you have the energy; no thoughts of harming yourself.
  • Sleep: poor, because you lie awake worrying about work.

Red flags

  • Present: Breathlessness on exertion that is new, which the candidate should weigh against the haemoglobin of 96.
  • Absent: No bleeding between periods or after sex; no pelvic mass or pressure symptoms; no post-coital pain.
  • Absent: No change in bowel habit, no blood in the stool, no weight loss, no abdominal pain, no dysphagia.
  • Absent: No bruising, nosebleeds or gum bleeding; no fevers, night sweats or lumps.
  • Absent: No chest pain, palpitations or faints.

Hidden facts and their triggers

  • The true heaviness of the periods: flooding, clots, two days off work — released only if the doctor asks about periods in a matter-of-fact way; a vague “are your periods OK?” gets “they're fine”
  • Your mother's hysterectomy at 45 for heavy periods — released only if asked about the family
  • The leukaemia worry from your colleague's husband — released only if the doctor asks what worries you
  • The overdue smear: “there's never time” — released only if the doctor raises screening
  • The breathlessness on the stairs — released only if asked about exertion or breathing

Behaviour

  • Minute 1: laugh — “I chew ice all day, everyone at work thinks I'm mad.”
  • Minute 3, if asked about periods: look down — “They're… a lot. I thought that was normal.”
  • Minute 6: “I can't be off — we've got Ofsted.”
  • If the doctor links the anaemia to the periods, explains the results plainly, starts iron with a repeat count planned, offers something for the bleeding now and discusses the hormonal coil and the other options, arranges an examination and a scan if needed, sends the coeliac test, books the smear and safety-nets: relieved. Ask, “So it's the periods that's done this?” and “Will the coil stop my periods?”
  • If the doctor prescribes iron and nothing else: say thank you and leave.
  • If the doctor goes straight to a gynaecology referral before offering anything: “Do I really need to go to the hospital?”
  • If lectured about the smear: go quiet; answer in single words.

Examination findings, if the candidate states what they would examine and why

  • Video: you can show pale conjunctivae if asked to pull down your lower eyelid; your hands look pale.
  • If the candidate states what they would examine in person and why: pulse 88 regular; blood pressure 118/74; abdomen soft, no masses; a pelvic examination, if arranged and described, finds a normal-sized uterus and no adnexal mass. Offer to come in; nothing is examined today.
2 · Examiner mark sheet — generic SCA scheme plus the key facts for this case

Domain grades — with the key facts that earn a clear pass at this station

Domain (RCGP wording) · key facts for this caseCF (0)F (1)P (2)CP (3)Score
1 · Data gathering and diagnosis
  • Reads the results as a set: microcytic anaemia, ferritin 6, normal B12, folate and thyroid; coeliac serology not sent
  • A menstrual history detailed enough to grade the loss: days, flooding, clots, time off work; bleeding between periods and after sex
  • Screens the gut as a source of blood loss: bowel habit, blood in the stool, weight, indigestion, family history of bowel cancer
  • Pregnancy and contraception, mood, breathlessness on exertion; the ice craving recognised as pica
☐☐☐☐/3
2 · Clinical management and medical complexity (×1.5)
  • Summarises what the results and the story add up to and checks whether anything has been missed
  • Working diagnosis: iron-deficiency anaemia from heavy menstrual bleeding; gut blood loss and coeliac disease considered and tested, not assumed
  • The plan: oral iron with a repeat count, a treatment for the bleeding today, the coil and the alternatives, examination and scan, the smear
  • Safety-net for worsening breathlessness, chest pain, faints or flooding that does not settle; follow-up at four weeks with the blood count
☐ (0)☐ (1.5)☐ (3)☐ (4.5)/4.5
3 · Relating to others
  • Asks about periods without embarrassment and responds to “I thought that was normal”
  • Names the leukaemia fear when it surfaces and answers it with the results
  • Shares the choice of treatment for the bleeding; checks her understanding in her own words
  • Plans around “I can't be off — we've got Ofsted” rather than against it
☐☐☐☐/3
Case total/10.5

Global rating (recorded, not added to the total): ☐ Fail ☐ Bare Fail ☐ Bare Pass ☐ Pass

The domain grades (RCGP descriptors): CP clear pass — above the standard of a newly qualified, independent GP · P pass — sufficiently demonstrated at the standard · F fail — insufficiently demonstrated at the standard · CF clear fail — clearly demonstrated below the standard.

The RCGP grades each domain CF, F, P or CP and weights clinical management and medical complexity against the other two domains; the examination's maximum is 126 over twelve cases, which is 10.5 per case. The RCGP does not publish the mark each grade carries. MD Acumen's training sheet uses CF 0 · F 1 · P 2 · CP 3, with clinical management weighted ×1.5 (0 · 1.5 · 3 · 4.5), so that a case is marked out of 10.5 and a twelve-case circuit out of 126. A P in all three domains is 7.0; MD Acumen treats that line as the training standard for a case. The examination's pass mark is set by borderline regression for each diet and is published in the RCGP's diet summary reports; it is not a fixed fraction of 126.

Weighting rationale, in the RCGP's words: “To reflect the capability coverage within the clinical management and medical complexity domain this is weighted in comparison to the other two domains.”

3 · Expanded station standard — what earns a clear pass, pass, fail and clear fail here

Written to the standard of a newly qualified independent GP; the clear-pass row describes practice above that standard. It is a debriefing aid, not a checklist: the grade is a judgement that the essentials, the italic key facts on the mark sheet, were done well, at the patient's pace and in plain language. MD Acumen training standard; the RCGP does not publish case mark sheets.

GradeData gathering and diagnosisClinical management and medical complexityRelating to others
CPReads the whole result set in the first minute and tells her what it shows in two sentences before asking anything. Grades the menstrual loss precisely, asks about intermenstrual and post-coital bleeding and pressure symptoms because they change the investigation, recognises the ice craving as pica, and screens the gut and the family history without making her feel accused of hiding something.Treats the anaemia and its cause in one plan: iron with a dosing and side-effect conversation, a non-hormonal option she can start this cycle, the hormonal coil explained as the first-line long-term treatment, the examination and ultrasound arranged with their purpose stated, the coeliac test sent, the smear booked. Chooses the follow-up interval and explains what the repeat count will show. Owns the plan rather than referring it away.Hears “no trouble” and reframes it: heavy periods are a treatable medical problem, not a character trait. Uses her mother's story to normalise without dismissing. Builds the plan around the inspection, with adjustments rather than sick leave. Checks understanding by asking her to say what she will do this week and what the coil would mean for her periods.
PInterprets the results as iron deficiency and says so. Takes a menstrual history detailed enough to grade the loss, screens gut blood loss, asks about pregnancy and contraception, mood and breathlessness, and uses the record: the coeliac screen not sent, the smear overdue. Reaches a working diagnosis of iron-deficiency anaemia from heavy menstrual bleeding with the alternatives named.Starts oral iron with advice on dose, side-effects and the repeat count at two to four weeks, and explains that iron continues for three months after correction. Offers a treatment for the bleeding, with the hormonal coil as the first-line long-term option and the alternatives mentioned. Sends coeliac serology, arranges pelvic examination with consent, books the smear, gives a specific safety-net and a review at four weeks.Explains the results in plain language and links them to her story. Asks about periods without embarrassment and responds to “I thought that was normal”. Names and answers the leukaemia fear if it surfaces. Shares the choice of treatment and checks her understanding. Acknowledges the inspection and plans around it.
FTreats the tiredness generically or the anaemia as a number. Takes no menstrual history, or accepts “they're fine” without asking what heavy means. Does not screen the gut for blood loss or ask about the family. Does not notice the coeliac screen was never sent or that the smear is overdue. Working diagnosis reached without a cause.Iron only, with no plan for the bleeding, or a gynaecology referral as the only action. No coeliac test. No repeat count arranged, or one without a date. The smear not booked. Safety-net generic, or absent. Review left to her to request.Accepts the request for iron without exploring it. Lectures about the smear so that she stops talking. Leaves ferritin, microcytic and pica unexplained. Misses “I can't be off — we've got Ofsted” or dismisses it. Does not ask what worries her, so the leukaemia fear is never answered.
CFNo systematic history at all; the results read as “you're a bit anaemic” and nothing else; the periods never raised in twelve minutes; the breathlessness on the stairs not asked about or not weighed. Or a history so disorganised that no working diagnosis is stated.Unsafe or absent: no iron, or iron with no follow-up and no cause sought; the bleeding ignored entirely; a referral to haematology for an anaemia with an obvious cause; no safety-net for a haemoglobin of 96 with exertional breathlessness. She leaves with the same problem and no plan.Dismissive of the tiredness or the periods; embarrassed or embarrassing on the menstrual history; moralising about the smear; jargon throughout with no check of understanding. No attempt to find out what she thinks or fears, and no partnership in the plan.

Where candidates lose this station

  • Asking about periods vaguely and accepting “they're fine”, so the cause of the anaemia is never found (statement D1)
  • Prescribing iron alone, with no plan for the bleeding that caused it and no repeat count (statement C8)
  • Lecturing about the overdue smear so that she stops contributing to the consultation (statement R5)

What the examiner is listening for in the last four minutes

By 8:00 the working diagnosis and its cause should have been stated. The examiner is listening for: iron with a repeat count and a date; a treatment for the bleeding she can start now and the coil explained as the first-line long-term option; the coeliac test, the examination and the smear arranged; a safety-net that names breathlessness, chest pain, faints and flooding that does not settle; and a check of understanding in her words, including what the coil would do to her periods.

4 · RCGP feedback statements — where underperformance was identified — with case-specific examples

The ten statements below are postulated: the feedback an examiner would most likely attach at this station, chosen from the RCGP's standardised list of 26 feedback statements that applies to every SCA case and spans the three marking domains (Data Gathering and Diagnosis; Clinical Management and Medical Complexity; Relating to Others). They are a prediction from the case content, its complexity and the marks that matter, not an examiner's record: any statement on the full list can be attached to any case, and feedback plays no part in the mark. Record the statements that applied in the practice log.

RCGP feedback statement (postulated top ten)Underperformance it signals (generic)Station-specific example
D1 · Data gathering was insufficient to enable safe assessment of the condition/situation
Data gathering and diagnosis · Data gathering and interpretation
History too thin to decide safely: the presenting problem not characterised, the essential negatives not asked.
  • Asks “are your periods OK?”, accepts “they're fine” and never grades the loss.
  • Does not ask about breathlessness, so the exertional symptom is missed.
D2 · Existing information about the case was insufficiently utilised
Data gathering and diagnosis · Data gathering and interpretation; Organisation, management and leadership
The records, results or the referral note not read or not used; questions asked that the notes already answer.
  • Does not read that B12, folate and thyroid are normal, and orders them again.
  • Misses that the coeliac screen was never sent and that the smear is overdue.
D6 · The implications of relevant findings identified during the data gathering were insufficiently recognised or understood
Data gathering and diagnosis · Data gathering and interpretation
A finding or result is elicited but its meaning is not recognised or not followed up.
  • Hears “I chew ice all day” and does not recognise pica.
  • Sees the ferritin of 6 and calls the anaemia mild.
D7 · Differential diagnoses or hypotheses were inadequately generated or tested
Data gathering and diagnosis · Making diagnosis/decisions
One diagnosis assumed; alternatives not generated, or generated but not tested with a question.
  • Assumes diet and never considers menstrual or gut blood loss.
  • Does not consider coeliac disease in a microcytic anaemia.
C2 · The management plan relating to prescribing of medication was inappropriate or not reflective of current practice
Clinical management and medical complexity · Clinical management
A drug started, continued or stopped against current guidance, or without the checks it needs.
  • Prescribes iron without dose, duration or side-effect advice, and no repeat count.
  • Offers the combined pill at 42 without checking her eligibility.
C5 · The plan relating to the medical management of risk was inadequate or inappropriate
Clinical management and medical complexity · Clinical management; Organisation, management and leadership
Clinical risk left unmanaged: no plan for the thing that could go wrong, or the risk not weighed.
  • No plan for a haemoglobin of 96 if the breathlessness worsens.
  • No repeat count, so a failure to respond would not be found.
C8 · Inappropriate or inadequate arrangements for follow-up, continuity and/or safety netting
Clinical management and medical complexity · Clinical management
No follow-up, continuity or safety-net, or one too vague to act on.
  • Prescribes iron alone, with no plan for the bleeding that caused it and no repeat count.
  • Ends with an invitation to come back if she is no better.
R2 · The person's agenda, health beliefs and/or preferences were insufficiently explored
Relating to others · Communication and consultation skills; Practising holistically, promoting health and safeguarding
What the person thinks is wrong, fears, or wants is not asked, or not used in the plan.
  • Does not ask what she thinks is causing the tiredness.
  • Never asks what worries her, so the leukaemia fear stays hidden.
R4 · Explanations were inadequately shared or adapted for the person's needs
Relating to others · Communication and consultation skills
Explanation in jargon, at the wrong pace, or not adapted to the person's level and concerns.
  • Leaves ferritin, microcytic and the coil's mechanism unexplained.
  • Explains the results so fast that she cannot ask “Will the coil stop my periods?”
R5 · A judgemental approach was shown to the person
Relating to others · Communication and consultation skills; Maintaining an ethical approach
Disapproval, moralising or blame shown in words or manner.
  • Lectures about the overdue smear so that she stops contributing to the consultation.
  • Implies that she should have come sooner about the periods.

The full list of 26 statements, with the generic meaning of each, is on the exam and the mark scheme.

5 · Examiner points of fact and guidelines

Points of fact the examiner should have to hand

Each statement is drawn from the named guideline, in its current version, with the date it was checked. The examiner marks against these facts; the candidate is not expected to quote them.

  1. A haemoglobin below 120 g/L in a non-pregnant woman is anaemia; a ferritin below 15 micrograms/L confirms iron deficiency, and a low MCV with a low ferritin is iron deficiency until proven otherwise. In a premenopausal woman with heavy menstrual bleeding and no gastrointestinal symptoms, menstrual loss is the usual cause; coeliac serology is still sent. NICE CKS — Anaemia, iron deficiency, diagnosis; investigations, current online version, checked 10 Oct 2026
  2. Oral iron: one tablet of ferrous sulfate 200 mg (65 mg elemental iron) once daily, or on alternate days if not tolerated; check the full blood count after two to four weeks for a rise in haemoglobin, and continue iron for three months after the haemoglobin has normalised to replenish stores. NICE CKS — Anaemia, iron deficiency, management: treatment and monitoring, current online version, checked 10 Oct 2026
  3. Heavy menstrual bleeding: take a history that covers the nature of the bleeding, related symptoms, impact on quality of life, intermenstrual and post-coital bleeding, pelvic pain and pressure symptoms; a physical examination is offered before any investigation or treatment for the bleeding. NICE — NG88 Heavy menstrual bleeding: assessment and management, section 1.1, history and examination, 2018, last updated May 2021, checked 10 Oct 2026
  4. Offer the levonorgestrel intrauterine system as first-line treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding with no identified pathology, fibroids under 3 cm or suspected adenomyosis; if declined or unsuitable, consider tranexamic acid or an NSAID (non-hormonal), or the combined pill or cyclical oral progestogen (hormonal). NICE — NG88 Heavy menstrual bleeding: assessment and management, section 1.5, management, 2018, last updated May 2021, checked 10 Oct 2026
  5. Consider pelvic ultrasound as the first-line investigation when the uterus is palpable abdominally, examination suggests a pelvic mass, or the history or examination suggests a structural or histological abnormality; a full blood count is taken in all women with heavy menstrual bleeding. NICE — NG88 Heavy menstrual bleeding: assessment and management, section 1.2, investigations, 2018, last updated May 2021, checked 10 Oct 2026
  6. Refer on a suspected-cancer pathway for colorectal cancer, or use FIT to guide referral, when there is iron-deficiency anaemia with no obvious cause; in a premenopausal woman with heavy periods the cause is evident, but any change in bowel habit, rectal bleeding or abdominal mass triggers the pathway regardless. NICE — NG12 Suspected cancer: recognition and referral, section 1.3, lower gastrointestinal tract cancers, 2015, last updated 2025, checked 10 Oct 2026
  7. Serological testing for coeliac disease is offered to people with unexplained iron-deficiency anaemia, and to people with persistent unexplained fatigue; the person must be eating gluten in more than one meal a day for at least six weeks before testing. NICE — NG20 Coeliac disease: recognition, assessment and management, section 1.1, recognition, 2015, checked 10 Oct 2026
  8. Women are invited for cervical screening every three years from 25 to 49 in England (every five years where primary HPV screening applies, from 2025); a woman who has missed an invitation can book at any time and does not need a GP referral. GOV.UK (NHS England) — Cervical screening: programme overview, 2025, checked 10 Oct 2026
  9. Offer FIT to adults with iron-deficiency anaemia at any age, and to adults aged 60 and over with anaemia even without iron deficiency. Refer on a suspected-cancer pathway for colorectal cancer when the result is 10 micrograms of haemoglobin per gram of faeces or more. A negative result does not exclude cancer: safety-net, and consider referral if symptoms persist or there is strong clinical concern. NICE — NG12 Suspected cancer: recognition and referral, section 1.3, lower gastrointestinal tract cancers: FIT recommendations (August 2023 update), 2015, last updated 2025, checked 10 Oct 2026
  10. In iron-deficiency anaemia the GP sends coeliac serology, tests the urine for blood, and takes a menstrual, dietary and drug history. A premenopausal woman with heavy periods, no gastrointestinal symptoms and no family history of colorectal cancer is treated for the menstrual cause; gastrointestinal investigation is reserved for those with symptoms, a family history, or an anaemia that does not respond to iron. NICE CKS — Anaemia, iron deficiency, management: investigations and when to refer, current online version, checked 10 Oct 2026
  11. Oral iron is best absorbed on an empty stomach, an hour before food; tea, coffee, milk and antacids reduce absorption, and taking it with food is acceptable if that is the only way it is tolerated. Warn that the stools turn black and that nausea, constipation or diarrhoea are common. Haemoglobin should rise by about 20 g/L every three to four weeks; if it does not, check adherence and tolerance and consider continuing blood loss or malabsorption. Intravenous iron is for intolerance or failure to respond. NICE CKS — Anaemia, iron deficiency, management: prescribing information and follow-up, current online version, checked 10 Oct 2026
  12. Consider testing for a coagulation disorder, such as von Willebrand disease, in a woman who has had heavy menstrual bleeding since her periods began and has a personal or family history suggesting a bleeding disorder. Do not routinely test female hormone levels or thyroid function for heavy menstrual bleeding. Offer outpatient hysteroscopy, rather than ultrasound, when the history suggests submucosal fibroids, polyps or endometrial pathology, for example persistent intermenstrual bleeding. NICE — NG88 Heavy menstrual bleeding: assessment and management, section 1.2, investigations: laboratory tests; hysteroscopy and ultrasound, 2018, last updated May 2021, checked 10 Oct 2026
  13. Combined hormonal contraception is UKMEC category 2 from age 40, category 3 in a woman aged 35 or over who smokes fewer than 15 cigarettes a day and category 4 if she smokes 15 or more, category 3 at a BMI of 35 or above, and category 4 with migraine with aura. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system, the implant and the progestogen-only pill are category 1 or 2 in each of these circumstances. FSRH — UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC), tables: age; smoking; obesity; headaches, 2016, amended September 2019, checked 10 Oct 2026
  14. The Topic Guide 'Gynaecology and breast health' expects the GP to assess and manage menstrual problems, including heavy menstrual bleeding, in primary care: a structured history, examination, ultrasound where indicated, first-line treatment including the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, and recognition of the features that need referral. The Haematology Topic Guide expects the GP to diagnose iron-deficiency anaemia, treat it, and establish its cause. RCGP — GP curriculum: Gynaecology and breast health, menstrual problems and heavy menstrual bleeding; Haematology Topic Guide: anaemia, Being a GP, 2025 curriculum, checked 10 Oct 2026

Working references for this station

IssuerDocumentVersionChecked
NICE CKSAnaemia, iron deficiencycurrent online version10 Oct 2026
NICENG88 Heavy menstrual bleeding: assessment and management2018, last updated May 202110 Oct 2026
NICENG12 Suspected cancer: recognition and referral2015, last updated 202510 Oct 2026
NICENG20 Coeliac disease: recognition, assessment and management201510 Oct 2026
GOV.UK (NHS England)Cervical screening: programme overview202510 Oct 2026
FSRHUK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC)2016, amended September 201910 Oct 2026
RCGPGP curriculum, Topic Guides: Gynaecology and breast health · Haematology · Consulting in general practiceBeing a GP, 2025 curriculum10 Oct 2026

14 statements, 785 words. Every statement is signed by the Course Director before it is published; a station whose facts have changed since signature carries no signature line until it is signed again.

This case's topic and its signed Golden Triangle, for review after the station.

Golden Triangle: Iron-deficiency anaemia in adults Knowledge Green, Evidence Amber, Real-world Amber. The triangle is white because it has not reached the Equinox. Evidence has one arrow pointing in to the Equinox; Real-world has one arrow pointing in to the Equinox; Green corners have no arrow.

Golden Triangle

Iron-deficiency anaemia in adults

Knowledge Green · Evidence Amber · Real-world Amber

Not yet at the Equinox · UK (NHS England) · as of 8 October 2026 · How the triangle works

6 · RCGP curriculum tags for this case
RCGP curriculum (2025)This case
Topic Guide(s)Gynaecology and breast health · Haematology · Consulting in general practice
Core capabilitiesData gathering and interpretation · Decision-making and diagnosis · Clinical management · Communicating and consulting
SCA Clinical Experience Group(s)Investigation / Results · Gender, reproductive and sexual health, including women's, men's, LGBTQ+, gynae and breast · New presentation of undifferentiated disease
AKT blueprint clinical areaFemale reproductive health (broader representation)
Case typeresults
Modalityvideo
7 · My marks and reflection — practice log form

Record your three domain grades, your case total out of 10.5, your global rating, the RCGP feedback statements that applied, and what you will keep and change. The form is already labelled with this case and its web address; a copy of your entry is emailed to you, so your practice log builds up in your inbox and can be downloaded.

Record my marks and reflection for SCA-01

Revision link for this case: mdacumen.com/sca-station1-tiredness

Independence & scope. Formative training material from MD Acumen Ltd; not a prediction of exam performance. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or delivered on behalf of the Royal College of General Practitioners; the marking domains and feedback statements are the RCGP's published ones, and every descriptor on this page is an Acumen training tool calibrated to them. Clinical content reflects UK guidance at the date of editorial review — always check the current guideline. All patients are fictional.