MD Acumen · PLAB 2 OSCE / CPSA course · free practice resources
Practice case P2-39 · Face-to-face · simulated patient

“It’s just piles, isn’t it?” — a change in bowel habit and blood on the paper

A 63-year-old school receptionist has come for the results of blood tests the practice nurse took last week. She mentioned to the nurse that her bowels have been “a bit off”.

Reviewed and kept current

Station family: History, diagnosis and management · 8-minute station · 1 min 30 s reading · Last editorial review: 16 October 2026 · Next scheduled refresh: 11 April 2027.

Candidate instructions

Read this as you would outside the room

You have 1 minute 30 seconds to read, then 8 minutes. Candidates: everything below this section is folded away — leave it closed until you have finished the station.

Information
Your roleFoundation Year 2 doctor in a general practice. Your supervising GP is available.
PatientMrs Wendy Harcourt, 63, part-time school receptionist
Reason for appointmentBooked by the practice nurse: “Bloods taken for tiredness. Says her bowels have been a bit off and she has seen some blood. Please see.”
Results (taken 8 days ago)Haemoglobin 104 g/L (115–165). MCV 73 fL (80–100). Platelets 372 × 10⁹/L (150–400). White cells 6.8 × 10⁹/L (4.0–11.0). Ferritin 9 µg/L (15–200). CRP 3 mg/L (<5). Urea, electrolytes, eGFR, liver function, TSH and HbA1c: within reference ranges.
RecordsHypertension: ramipril 5 mg daily. Haemorrhoids after her second pregnancy, 1990. Last period at 51. NHS bowel-screening kit returned two years ago — normal. Non-smoker. No known allergies.

Your task

•
Take a focused history.
•
You may ask for examination findings; they will be read out to you.
•
Explain the results and what you think is going on, and agree a management plan with her.
Folded away

For the actor and the examiner

1 · Actor script — role player only

Candidates: do not open until you have consulted.

Persona and manner

  • Wendy Harcourt, 63, works three days a week on reception at the local primary school; married to Clive, a retired electrician; two daughters and four grandchildren whom you look after on Tuesdays. Cheerful, chatty, apologetic for “wasting the doctor’s time” — and privately very frightened.
  • You are a little pale and you sigh when you sit down.

Opening line — say this verbatim

  • “The nurse said my blood was a bit low. It’s just piles, isn’t it? I had them years ago with the girls.”

Volunteer freely if given the space

  • For about two months your bowels have been “a bit off” — looser than usual, three or four times a day, where you used to go once in the morning.
  • You have seen bright red blood on the paper on and off for about six weeks — and once or twice in the pan, mixed in.
  • You have been tired — “flat” — for a couple of months; you put it down to the grandchildren and your age.

Only if asked

  • Stools: looser, no proper shape, three or four times a day, sometimes with a feeling you have not finished. No black stool. Mucus: a little, sometimes. No pain passing them. No abdominal pain beyond mild cramps before you go.
  • Blood: bright red, on the paper most days and mixed into the stool twice. No pain or lump at the back passage; the piles you had years ago were sore and “came down”, and this is not like that.
  • Weight: if asked directly, your clothes are looser and the scales at home say you are about three kilos lighter than at Christmas; you have not been dieting. Appetite normal.
  • Tiredness: breathless going up the stairs with the laundry, which is new; no chest pain; no palpitations; no dizziness.
  • Diet: a normal mixed diet, including red meat twice a week. No gluten-free diet. No recent travel. No antibiotics.
  • Medicines: ramipril only. No aspirin, no ibuprofen or other anti-inflammatory painkillers — “just the odd paracetamol”. No iron tablets.
  • Screening: you did the bowel-screening kit two years ago and it came back normal — “so it can’t be anything bad, can it?”
  • Family: if asked whether anyone in the family has had bowel cancer or bowel problems, your aunt died of bowel cancer at 70; nobody else. Keep this back unless asked, or invited to add anything.
  • Periods: stopped at 51; no bleeding since. No urinary symptoms. No joint pains, mouth ulcers or skin rashes. No previous bowel investigations.

Impact on daily life — home and work (only if asked)

  • You have stopped doing the Saturday markets because you need to know where a toilet is.
  • You are too tired to have the grandchildren all day on a Tuesday and you have not told your daughter why.
  • You have been lying awake, and you have not told Clive about the blood — “he’d only worry”.

Ideas, concerns and expectations

  • Idea: piles — the same as after your second daughter; and that the tiredness is “just your age”.
  • Concern: that it is bowel cancer, like your aunt — you will say so only if asked what worries you, or once your aunt has come up.
  • Expectation: some cream for the piles and iron tablets for the blood count.

Cues to deliver, timed

  • Minute 2: “Can you just give me some cream for the piles?” (Said brightly; if ignored, do not repeat.)
  • Minute 4, if the family history has not come up and you have not been asked what worries you: look down and say, “My aunt had trouble with her bowels.” If the doctor does not follow it up, say no more.

If the doctor summarises and asks whether you want to add anything

  • If your aunt’s bowel cancer has not come out: “I should say — my aunt died of bowel cancer. She was seventy. That’s what I keep thinking about.”
  • If it has: “If the test comes back clear, does that mean it’s definitely not cancer?”

How to respond to the doctor

  • If the doctor explains plainly that your blood count is low because you are short of iron, that in a woman your age who has stopped having periods this usually means blood is being lost from the bowel, and that with the change in your bowels and the bleeding it needs to be checked properly — including a camera test of the bowel — to find the cause, which could be piles but could be something more serious including cancer: you are frightened but grateful for the honesty — “What happens now?”
  • If the doctor explains the stool test (a small sample you post back), that a result above the threshold means an urgent hospital referral on the cancer pathway, and that because of the anaemia and the symptoms you will still be referred to the bowel specialists even if the stool test is low: you accept, and ask whether you should tell Clive.
  • If the doctor starts iron tablets and explains the side-effects and the recheck: you accept.
  • If the doctor asks to do a rectal examination: say “Do I have to? Can it wait?” If the doctor explains why, offers a chaperone and says it is your choice: “All right.” If the doctor gives no choice or does not explain: “No, I’d rather not.” (No findings are then given.)
  • If the doctor says it is piles, gives cream and iron and tells you to come back if it carries on; or says the stool test will decide everything and “if it’s negative there’s nothing to worry about”: you agree, relieved — and the examiner notes it.
  • If told you “definitely have cancer” or that the hospital will “sort it out next week”: you cry and stop listening.
  • If asked what you are most worried about: you say you are scared it is what your aunt had, and that you have not told Clive.

Do not

  • Volunteer the weight loss, your aunt’s bowel cancer or your fear of cancer unless asked — or invited to add anything (apart from the timed cues).
  • Say “bowel cancer” before the doctor has asked what worries you or your aunt has come up.
  • Argue once the plan has been explained kindly.

Findings to give the candidate — only if asked for

Give each finding only when the candidate asks for it or says they would examine that part. The rectal examination findings are given only if the candidate explains the examination, asks her consent and offers a chaperone.

General: mildly pale conjunctivae; looks tired but well. Weight 66 kg (69 kg eighteen months ago in the record). BP 136/82, pulse 84 regular, temperature 36.7 °C. Abdomen: soft, non-tender; no mass; no hepatomegaly; no lymph nodes. Digital rectal examination, if asked having explained, gained consent and offered a chaperone: a small, soft external haemorrhoid at 7 o’clock, not thrombosed; no anal fissure, mass or ulceration; the rectum is empty of mass; no blood on the glove. Chest and heart: normal.

2 · Examiner mark sheet — generic scheme plus the key facts for this case

Domain marks — with the key facts that earn a 4 at this station

Domain (GMC wording) · key facts for this case1234Score
1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skills
  • Bowel history: two months looser, 3–4 a day, incomplete emptying, mucus; bright red blood on paper and mixed in, six weeks; no pain, no black stool
  • Anaemia symptoms and causes: breathless on stairs, tiredness; diet, NSAIDs and aspirin, menstrual bleeding (none post-menopause), coeliac symptoms; previous bowel investigations; screening kit two years ago
  • Red flags and risk: unintentional weight loss (3 kg), abdominal mass, aunt died of bowel cancer at 70; asks for examination findings including an explained, chaperoned rectal examination
  • ICE (piles; fears bowel cancer like her aunt; expects cream and iron) and impact — Saturday markets, the grandchildren, Clive not told
☐☐☐☐/4
2 · Clinical management skills
  • Summary and check, then the working diagnosis: iron-deficiency anaemia (Hb 104, MCV 73, ferritin 9), post-menopausal, with changed bowel habit and rectal bleeding — colorectal cancer to exclude
  • Why not: haemorrhoids (small; do not explain anaemia or altered habit), diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, coeliac disease, diet; a normal screening FIT two years ago does not exclude cancer
  • FIT sent today (suspected-cancer pathway if ≥10 µg Hb/g); gastroenterology referral whatever the FIT result (post-menopausal IDA); coeliac serology; ferrous sulfate 200 mg daily, FBC in 4 weeks
  • Safety-net: heavy bleeding, tarry stools with faintness, breathlessness at rest or chest pain → 999 / emergency department; severe abdominal pain, vomiting or not opening bowels → same day; no hospital contact within a week → ring the practice · Follow-up: FIT and coeliac results in one week; gastroenterology referral tracked; FBC in 4 weeks
☐☐☐☐/4
3 · Interpersonal skills
  • Does not collude with “it’s just piles” — explains why kindly and clearly
  • Names cancer as a possibility when she opens the door, with honest proportion; does not promise the result either way
  • Elicits the family history — or picks up “My aunt had trouble with her bowels” if it comes — and asks what she fears
  • Explains the rectal examination before asking; checks what she will tell Clive; teach-back of the three things
☐☐☐☐/4
Station total/12

Domain score (educational construct):

ScoreDescriptor
1Unsatisfactory (did not achieve safe FY2 standard)
2Borderline (just achieving minimum safe FY2 standard)
3Satisfactory (competent and safe FY2 standard)
4Good (exceeds FY2 standard)

This 1–4 domain score and its descriptors are an Acumen educational construct: the GMC publishes the three marking domains and the four-mark maximum, but not the descriptors its examiners use, and it does not publish station mark sheets. See Legal & Regulatory.

Marks are 1 to 4 in each domain; the generic descriptor for each mark is on the mark scheme page, and the structure of the eight minutes is on the 8-minute station page. The full standard for this case is in section 3 and the GMC feedback statements, with examples from this case, are in section 4. The examination findings that the role player gives — only if the candidate asks for them — are at the end of section 1.

3 · Expanded station-specific marking standard — what earns 4, 3, 2 and 1 here

The top row is the full picture of what a competent FY2 could do at this station, including the working diagnosis with its justified differentials, the safety-net and the follow-up; lower rows describe how performance falls away. It is a debriefing aid, not a checklist to recite: nobody says every line in eight minutes, and a 4 is a judgement that the essentials — the italic key facts on the mark sheet — were done well, in plain language and at the patient’s pace. Acumen training standard — the GMC does not publish station mark sheets.

MarkDomain 1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skillsDomain 2 · Clinical management skillsDomain 3 · Interpersonal skills
4
  • Open start; lets her tell the story, then characterises the change in bowel habit — frequency, consistency, duration, mucus, tenesmus, nocturnal stools, pain — and the bleeding — colour, on the paper or mixed in, amount, duration, pain or lump at the anus, black stools
  • Symptoms of anaemia and their effect: tiredness, breathlessness on exertion, palpitations, dizziness, chest pain
  • Other causes of iron loss or deficiency screened: aspirin and NSAIDs, dyspepsia or upper-GI symptoms, diet, post-menopausal bleeding, coeliac features (bloating, mouth ulcers), previous gastrectomy or bowel surgery
  • Red flags and risk: unintentional weight loss, appetite, abdominal pain or mass, family history of colorectal cancer; previous bowel investigations and the screening result, and what a normal screening test two years ago does and does not mean
  • Interprets the results aloud — low haemoglobin with a low MCV and a ferritin of 9: iron-deficiency anaemia; normal CRP, renal, liver and thyroid function; platelets at the upper end
  • Asks for examination findings — pallor, weight, abdomen for mass and liver, lymph nodes — and a digital rectal examination after explaining what it involves, obtaining consent and offering a chaperone
  • ICE: thinks it is piles and her age; fears bowel cancer like her aunt; expects cream and iron tablets
  • Impact on daily living: has given up the Saturday markets, cannot manage the grandchildren, not sleeping, has not told Clive
  • Summarises and checks whether Mrs Harcourt wants to add anything — which is when her aunt’s bowel cancer comes out, if it has not already
  • Working diagnosis with justified differentials: iron-deficiency anaemia (haemoglobin 104 g/L, MCV 73 fL, ferritin 9 micrograms/L) in a post-menopausal woman with a two-month change in bowel habit, rectal bleeding mixed with stool, 3 kg of unintentional weight loss and an aunt who died of bowel cancer — colorectal cancer must be excluded. Haemorrhoids are present but small and do not explain anaemia, altered habit or blood mixed in the stool; diverticular disease and inflammatory bowel disease can cause both and are found at colonoscopy; coeliac disease is tested with serology; diet alone is unlikely with red meat twice a week and no other loss. A normal screening FIT two years ago does not rule cancer out
  • Offers a quantitative FIT today (NG12 1.3.1: adults with iron-deficiency anaemia, change in bowel habit, or aged 50 and over with rectal bleeding) and explains that a result of 10 micrograms of haemoglobin per gram of faeces or more leads to a suspected-cancer pathway referral for colorectal cancer; explains the kit and that it should go back within days; says that if the FIT is below 10 she will still be referred to the bowel specialists — CKS asks for gastroenterology referral of all post-menopausal women with iron-deficiency anaemia, and strong clinical concern should not be delayed by a low FIT (NG12 1.3.3)
  • Starts treatment without waiting for investigations: ferrous sulfate 200 mg once daily (65 mg elemental iron), explaining black stools, constipation or nausea, alternate-day dosing if not tolerated, and a full blood count in four weeks expecting a rise of about 20 g/L; coeliac serology (total IgA and IgA tissue transglutaminase) sent now, while she is eating gluten
  • Explains what the hospital is likely to do, as the usual pathway and not a promise: a colonoscopy, or CT colonography if colonoscopy is unsuitable, within the 28-day diagnosis-or-rule-out aim; most people referred on the pathway do not have cancer; if the camera test is normal, the upper bowel is also considered in a post-menopausal woman with iron deficiency
  • Answers her own agenda: the piles can be treated once the cause of the anaemia is known; cream alone would be the wrong answer; the screening kit was reassuring two years ago but is not a test for symptoms now; credit if offered, not required for a 4: dietary iron advice; asks her consent to put the family history in the referral
  • Tells the supervising GP; records the family history; safety-net and follow-up as below
  • Safety-net: heavy rectal bleeding, passing clots, feeling faint, breathlessness at rest or chest pain → 999 or the emergency department; severe or constant abdominal pain, vomiting, a swollen tummy or not opening her bowels or passing wind → same-day appointment or NHS 111 out of hours; black stools are expected on iron, but black, sticky, tar-like stools with feeling faint, dizzy or breathless, or any vomiting of blood → 999 or the emergency department; if the stool-test kit has not been returned within a week, or no hospital contact has arrived within a week of the referral → ring the practice; new bleeding or pain is not an expected effect of the iron.
  • Follow-up: telephone or face-to-face appointment with the FY2 or her usual GP in about one week for the FIT and coeliac results and to confirm that the gastroenterology referral has gone — on the suspected-cancer pathway if the FIT is 10 or more; full blood count at four weeks to check that the haemoglobin has risen by about 20 g/L and that the iron is tolerated, then at two to four months; iron continued for three months after the count is normal; the practice tracks the referral and reviews the hospital letter; the family history is recorded; the supervising GP is told today.
  • Hears “It’s just piles, isn’t it?” and explains kindly why the blood count means more than piles, without frightening her at once
  • Raises the possibility of cancer plainly once she has opened the door, with honest proportion — it must be checked; most people checked do not have it; no one can promise
  • Explains the rectal examination before asking, and accepts a refusal without pressure
  • Plain language — “a camera test of the bowel”, “a stool sample you post back”, not “FIT”, “colonoscopy” or “IDA”
  • Checks what she will tell Clive and her daughter; teach-back of the three things: post the kit back, start the iron, what to do if she bleeds heavily
3Bowel and bleeding history taken, results interpreted and the rectal examination requested with consent; one of the NSAID and diet history, the family history, the screening discussion or the impact missing.Correct working diagnosis, FIT sent and iron started; one of the coeliac serology, the explanation of what happens if FIT is low, the FBC recheck or the explanation of colonoscopy missing.Warm and clear; the aunt cue picked up late, or the cancer conversation a little abrupt.
2Takes the bleeding history as “piles” and does not characterise the bowel habit or ask about weight loss; results read out but not interpreted; no rectal examination requested.Sends a FIT but says it will decide everything and that a low result means no referral; or refers without explaining why; or starts iron without a plan to recheck.Pleasant but formulaic; “can you just give me some cream?” answered with a flat no; the aunt cue missed.
1Accepts “piles” and “low blood” and asks a few closed questions. Or unsafe: does not look at the results, or asks for a rectal examination without explanation, consent or a chaperone offered.Haemorrhoid cream and iron tablets, “come back if it carries on”; no FIT, no referral plan. Or unsafe: tells her it is piles and that the normal screening test means it cannot be cancer; or promises that the hospital will see her next week or that the result will be fine.Dismissive (“it’s your age”) or alarming (“this sounds like cancer”); she leaves unsure what the kit is for. Or unsafe: says it is cancer before any investigation; or presses on with a rectal examination after she declines; or mocks the ‘fuss’.
4 · GMC feedback statements — where underperformance was identified — with case-specific examples

A feedback statement marks where underperformance was identified in the consultation. With PLAB 2 results the GMC may attach any combination of the ten statements to a station — none, one or several. The right-hand column shows what each one looks like at this station. Record the statements that applied in the practice log.

GMC feedback statementUnderperformance it signals (generic)Case-specific examples
1 · ConsultationDisorganised or unstructured consultationReads out the results, then takes a bowel history, then goes back to the results; no summary before the plan.
2 · IssuesKey issues or priorities not recognisedTreats the station as “piles and a low blood count” and does not recognise that the task is to act on iron-deficiency anaemia with altered bowel habit as possible colorectal cancer.
3 · TimePoor time managementSpends minutes on iron-rich foods and haemorrhoid cream; the bell goes before the stool test or the referral has been explained.
4 · FindingsAbnormal findings or results, or their implications, not identifiedTold haemoglobin 104, MCV 73 and ferritin 9 and does not say “iron deficiency”; told “mixed in” and “three kilos lighter” and does not react; does not ask about her aunt when she says “My aunt had trouble with her bowels.”
5 · ExaminationPhysical examination or use of instruments not competentDoes not ask for examination findings, or asks for a rectal examination without explaining it, gaining consent or offering a chaperone.
6 · DiagnosisWorking diagnosis or differential diagnoses not correct“It’s probably your piles” or “a bit of anaemia”; colorectal cancer never named; no reasoning against haemorrhoids, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticular disease or coeliac disease.
7 · ManagementManagement plan not reflecting current best practiceCream and iron and “come back if it carries on”; or a FIT with “if it’s negative there’s nothing to worry about”; no coeliac test; nothing said about heavy bleeding, faintness or the kit not being returned; no blood-count recheck booked.
8 · RapportRapport and sensitivity to the patient’s feelings and concerns not shownAgrees “It’s just piles, isn’t it?” to spare her; or answers “so it can’t be anything bad, can it?” with “that’s right”.
9 · ListeningVerbal and non-verbal cues not used; poor active listeningMisses “Can you just give me some cream for the piles?” and “My aunt had trouble with her bowels”; never invites her to add anything, so the family history is never mentioned.
10 · LanguageLanguage or explanations not understandable; understanding not checked“You’ve got microcytic IDA with a ferritin of 9 so we’ll send a FIT and if it’s over 10 you’ll go on the USC pathway for a colonoscopy — meanwhile start ferrous sulfate TDS.”
5 · Examiner points of fact and guidelines

Points of fact the examiner should have to hand

  1. NICE NG12 (Suspected cancer: recognition and referral, last updated 15 April 2026), rec 1.3.1 [2023]: offer quantitative faecal immunochemical testing (FIT), using one of the two analysers NICE recommends, to guide referral for suspected colorectal cancer in adults with an abdominal mass, a change in bowel habit, iron-deficiency anaemia, aged 40 and over with unexplained weight loss and abdominal pain, aged under 50 with rectal bleeding and unexplained abdominal pain or weight loss, aged 50 and over with unexplained rectal bleeding, abdominal pain or weight loss, or aged 60 and over with anaemia even without iron deficiency. FIT should be offered even if the person has previously had a negative FIT through the NHS bowel cancer screening programme. People with a rectal mass, an unexplained anal mass or anal ulceration do not need FIT before referral is considered (recs 1.3.5–1.3.6).
  2. NG12 rec 1.3.2: refer adults using a suspected cancer pathway referral for colorectal cancer if they have a FIT result of at least 10 micrograms of haemoglobin per gram of faeces. Rec 1.3.3: for people who have not returned a sample or whose FIT is below 10, safety-netting processes should be in place, and referral to an appropriate secondary care pathway should not be delayed if there is strong clinical concern of cancer because of ongoing unexplained symptoms. Rec 1.3.4: consider whether the person needs help to return the sample. These recommendations are adapted from NICE HealthTech guidance HTG690 (formerly DG56, published 24 August 2023; the recommendations are unchanged).
  3. “Suspected cancer pathway referral” (NG12, Terms used) means the person receives a diagnosis or ruling out of cancer within 28 days of urgent GP referral — NHS England’s 28-day Faster Diagnosis Standard, operational standard 80% from March 2026 (previously 75%). The FIT result usually takes a few days. Do not promise an appointment date, a colonoscopy date or a result.
  4. NICE CKS, Anaemia — iron deficiency (last revised July 2026): anaemia is a haemoglobin below 120 g/L in non-pregnant women over 15 and below 130 g/L in men; check ferritin in all anaemic people with an MCV below 95 fL; a serum ferritin below 30 micrograms/L confirms iron deficiency (ferritin can be falsely normal with inflammation — her CRP is 3). A diagnostic trial of iron should not be used in men or post-menopausal women, who are at higher risk of occult gastrointestinal bleeding and malignancy and need investigation. Refer all men and post-menopausal women with iron-deficiency anaemia to gastroenterology unless there is overt non-gastrointestinal bleeding; post-menopausal women with a haemoglobin below 100 g/L, and men below 120 g/L, are investigated more urgently. Urgent suspected-cancer referral if the FIT is 10 or more.
  5. Treatment (CKS, July 2026): do not wait for investigations before prescribing iron, unless colonoscopy is imminent; ferrous sulfate 200 mg (65 mg elemental iron) once daily, or ferrous fumarate or gluconate, continued for three months after the deficiency is corrected; alternate-day dosing or an alternative oral preparation if not tolerated; modified-release and multi-nutrient combinations are not recommended. Recheck the full blood count within four weeks — the haemoglobin should rise by about 20 g/L over three to four weeks — then at two to four months; refer if the rise is under 20 g/L at two to four weeks. Warn about black stools, constipation and nausea, and about safe storage around grandchildren (accidental overdose can be fatal).
  6. Coeliac disease: NICE NG20 rec 1.1.1 — offer serological testing to people with unexplained iron, vitamin B12 or folate deficiency; the laboratory tests total IgA and IgA tissue transglutaminase first (rec 1.2.2); the person must be eating gluten daily for at least six weeks for the test to be valid (rec 1.1.4) and should not start a gluten-free diet before specialist confirmation (recs 1.1.3–1.1.4). A positive result is a gastroenterology referral in its own right (CKS).
  7. NHS bowel cancer screening (nhs.uk): a home FIT kit every two years for people aged 50 to 74 in England. A normal screening result is reassuring about that sample at that time; it is not a test for symptoms, and NG12 explicitly says to offer a symptomatic FIT regardless of a previous negative screening FIT. A family history of colorectal cancer (here an aunt) belongs in the referral letter; CKS asks for people aged 50 and over with marked anaemia or a significant family history of colorectal carcinoma to be referred to gastroenterology even if coeliac disease is found.
  8. Differentials to reason about: haemorrhoids (bright red blood on the paper, often with anal discomfort or a lump; rarely cause anaemia and do not cause a change in bowel habit — a small haemorrhoid in a 63-year-old with anaemia is a coincidence until proved otherwise); diverticular disease (can bleed, usually painlessly and in larger amounts); inflammatory bowel disease (diarrhoea with blood and mucus, weight loss — possible at any age); coeliac disease (iron deficiency with or without bowel symptoms); upper gastrointestinal loss (NSAIDs, peptic ulcer — she takes none and has no dyspepsia); dietary deficiency (unlikely on a mixed diet). Red flags: weight loss, abdominal or rectal mass, tenesmus, anaemia, family history.
  9. What the hospital is likely to do (NHS England timed colorectal pathway; local practice): a colonoscopy, or CT colonography where colonoscopy is unsuitable, usually within the 28-day aim; if the lower bowel is normal in a post-menopausal woman with iron deficiency, upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy is considered. Describe this as the usual sequence, not a promise. Tell her most people referred on the pathway do not have cancer (NG12 patient-support recommendations), without saying that she will not.

Where candidates lose marks at this station

  • “It’s just your piles” — cream and iron.
  • “Your screening test was normal, so it can’t be cancer.”
  • A FIT sent with “if it’s negative, nothing to worry about”.
  • Never asking about her aunt, her weight or NSAIDs.
  • A rectal examination requested without explanation, consent or a chaperone.
  • Starting iron with no plan to recheck the blood count — or waiting for the colonoscopy before starting it.

Guidelines for this station

6 · MLA content map tags for this case
MLA content mapThis station
Domain 1 · Areas of clinical practiceGastrointestinal (GI) · Cancer
Domain 3 · Clinical and professional capabilitiesHistory, examination and differential diagnosis · Investigations: request, interpret, act · Using guidelines and evidence · Safe prescribing · Communication with patients, relatives and carers
Domain 5 · Patient presentationsBowel habit change · Bleeding per rectum · Anaemia
Domain 6 · ConditionsColorectal cancer · Anaemia · Haemorrhoids
Station familyHistory, diagnosis and management — History, diagnosis and management
7 · My marks and reflection — practice log form

Record your three domain marks, your station total, the GMC feedback statements that applied (where underperformance was identified), and what you will keep and change. The form is already labelled with this case and its web address; a copy of your entry is emailed to you, so your practice log builds up in your inbox and can be downloaded.

Record my marks and reflection for P2-39

Revision link for this case: mdacumen.com/plab-2-osce/case-39-bowel-habit-and-bleeding

Independence & scope. Independent, formative training material from MD Acumen Ltd. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or delivered on behalf of the General Medical Council. The GMC does not publish its station mark sheets: every mark scheme and descriptor on these pages is an Acumen training tool calibrated to the GMC's published marking domains, feedback statements and the MLA content map. Practice scores are not a prediction of examination performance. Clinical content reflects UK guidance at the date of editorial review — always check the current guideline. All patients are fictional. This course never provides, and will never ask you to share, real GMC exam content — full regulatory statement: Legal & Regulatory.