MD Acumen · MRCGP SCA course · free practice resources
MRCGP SCA course · Station 14

Station 14 · Tired and cold

A sixteen-year-old attends alone about tiredness; her mother has left a message at reception asking you to check her weight, and not to say she called.

Reviewed and kept current

Video consultation · Under 19 · Mental health · Health disadvantage and vulnerabilities · 12-minute case · 3 min reading · Last editorial review: 11 October 2026 · Next scheduled refresh: 11 April 2027 · Clinical content signed by Course Director, 11 October 2026.

Candidate instructions

Read this as you would outside the room

Read the brief as you would in the examination (RCGP: twelve consultations with simulated patients, each lasting twelve minutes, with 3 minutes' reading at the start of each). There is no reference material. Everything below the brief is folded until the consultation is over.

Information
FrameYou have 3 minutes to read, then 12 minutes. Video consultation. Everything below this brief is folded away until the consultation is over.
Your roleGP registrar at a town practice, holding the afternoon's list. The health-care assistant saw her in person this morning.
PatientLily Turner, 16. Attends alone.
Reason for consultation“Tired.” Booked by the patient. Reception note this morning, from her mother by telephone: “Please check her weight. She's stopped eating, says she's fine. Don't tell her I called.”
FormatVideo, from the practice's consulting room; she is in the room with the camera; the health-care assistant's readings from this morning are in the record. You may ask what she is willing to show or check.

Information available

The records extract, printed as it appears.

Problem listNo entries. Menarche at 12.
MedicationNone. Allergies: none recorded.
GrowthWeight 62 kg at 14; height 165 cm.
Health-care assistant, todayWeight 47 kg. Pulse 52. BP 98/60 sitting; 86/56 standing (dizzy). Temperature 35.9. Height 165 cm.
FamilyParents separated. Lives with mother and brother, 12. Year 12 at school.

Your task

•
Assess her.
•
Reach a working diagnosis with the alternatives you have considered, and decide what needs to happen today.
•
Agree a plan with her, including who else needs to know.
•
Address her concerns.
Folded away

For the role player and the observer

Open these after the consultation, or during it if you are observing. The role-player script and every marking section are public (D-76): this is practice material, not an examination.

1 · Role-player script — opening line, story, ICE, hidden facts and triggers (examination findings last)

Candidates: do not open until you have consulted.

Persona and manner

  • Lily Turner, 16, Year 12; polite, guarded, a large hoodie, brief answers; you glance at the scales; you want a blood test and to be left alone.
  • Trust builds slowly if the doctor explains confidentiality and asks without accusation. You cry only at the end.

Opening line (verbatim)

  • “I've just been really tired and cold all the time. I think it's my iron or something. Can I just have a blood test?”

The story

  • “Tired. Cold. Stressed with A-levels. My periods are irregular.”
  • If asked: no period for four months.
  • If asked about eating: “Healthy. I cut out junk.” On gentle questioning: you skip breakfast, salad at lunch, “a small tea”; you count calories, about 700 a day; you exercise every day; you weigh yourself twice a day; “I still feel big.” No vomiting; no laxatives.
  • Dizzy on standing; your hair is falling out; you feel faint after PE; you cannot concentrate; your mood is low, “numb”.
  • If asked directly and kindly about hurting yourself: you scratch your arm “sometimes”; no thoughts of ending your life.
  • Friends “worry”; a friend “was in hospital for it”.
  • You know your mum phoned: “She does that.” You do not want your mum “told everything” but “I suppose she can know I've seen you”. Your form tutor is “safe”.
  • If asked whether you can decide about your own care: “I'm sixteen. Yes.”
  • If asked what you want: “to get better but not to get bigger”. You have looked at recovery accounts online.

Ideas, concerns and expectations

  • Idea: Iron, or stress.
  • Concern: Being made to eat; being sectioned; your mum “going mad”.
  • Expectation: A blood test, and to be left alone.

Impact

  • School: predicted A grades; a teacher has had a word about you looking unwell; you left PE early twice.
  • Sleep: you wake at four, cold, and lie awake planning food. Mood worst in the evening.
  • Home: your brother teases you about not eating; your mother “cooks and cries”.

Red flags

  • Present: A pulse of 52, a blood pressure of 98/60 with a postural drop of 12 and dizziness, a temperature of 35.9, 15 kg lost since 14, amenorrhoea for four months, daily exercise on 700 calories, scratching her arm.
  • Absent: No vomiting, no laxatives, no fainting with loss of consciousness, no chest pain, no confusion.
  • Absent: No thoughts of ending her life.

Hidden facts and their triggers

  • The calorie counting, the twice-daily weighing and “I still feel big” — released only only on gentle, non-accusing questions about eating and how she sees herself
  • The four months without a period — released only if asked what “irregular” means
  • The scratching — released only only if asked directly and kindly about hurting herself
  • That she knows her mum phoned and what she is willing for her mum to know — released only if the doctor raises her mum, or asks who she trusts
  • “To get better but not to get bigger” — released only if the doctor asks what she wants

Behaviour

  • Minute 1: the hoodie; a glance at the scales.
  • Minute 3: “I still feel big.”
  • Minute 5: “My friend was in hospital for it.”
  • If the doctor builds trust, explains confidentiality and its limits, gently explores eating and how you see yourself, recognises from this morning's readings that this is a physical emergency as well as an illness of the mind, explains that a same-day referral to the eating-disorder service and same-day bloods and a heart tracing are needed and why, discusses involving your mum with your agreement, asks about hurting yourself and your mood, and safety-nets specifically: cry quietly. “Will they make me eat?” and “Do you have to tell my mum?”
  • If the doctor orders a blood test and reassures: “Thanks.” Leave.
  • If the doctor leads with “your mum rang”: shut down. “So she's told you what to think.”
  • If the doctor lectures about eating: look at the door; answer in single words.

Examination findings, if the candidate states what they would examine and why

  • In the room: if the candidate states what they would examine and why, use this morning's readings and add: BMI 17.3, below the 0.4th centile for age; fine downy hair on the forearms; cool hands; capillary refill three seconds; she needs to use her arms to stand from a squat. If asked to show her arm: fine scratches on the left forearm, not deep.
2 · Examiner mark sheet — generic SCA scheme plus the key facts for this case

Domain grades — with the key facts that earn a clear pass at this station

Domain (RCGP wording) · key facts for this caseCF (0)F (1)P (2)CP (3)Score
1 · Data gathering and diagnosis
  • Today's readings and the weight trend read as physical risk: pulse 52, a postural drop with dizziness, 35.9, 15 kg lost since 14
  • Eating, exercise, purging and body image explored without accusation: 700 calories, daily exercise, weighing twice a day, “I still feel big”
  • The missed periods, dizziness, cold, hair loss, faintness after PE; mood, self-harm and thoughts of ending her life asked directly and kindly
  • Her capacity to decide established in passing; who she trusts; what her mum may know; the reception note used as context, never led with
☐☐☐☐/3
2 · Clinical management and medical complexity (×1.5)
  • Summarises the picture and what the readings mean and checks whether anything has been missed
  • Working diagnosis: an eating disorder with physical compromise; thyroid disease, coeliac disease and other causes of weight loss considered and tested, not assumed
  • The plan: a same-day referral to the eating-disorder service by telephone; same-day bloods and an ECG; the mother involved by agreement; a named contact
  • Safety-net for fainting, chest pain, confusion or collapse; follow-up within days; the limits of confidentiality explained before they are needed
☐ (0)☐ (1.5)☐ (3)☐ (4.5)/4.5
3 · Relating to others
  • Addresses her as the patient; explains confidentiality and its limits in her language before anything personal is asked
  • Non-judgemental about eating; responds to “I still feel big” and “My friend was in hospital for it”
  • Names the fear of being made to eat and answers it; separates help from force
  • Negotiates her mother's involvement; checks understanding in her own words
☐☐☐☐/3
Case total/10.5

Global rating (recorded, not added to the total): ☐ Fail ☐ Bare Fail ☐ Bare Pass ☐ Pass

The domain grades (RCGP descriptors): CP clear pass — above the standard of a newly qualified, independent GP · P pass — sufficiently demonstrated at the standard · F fail — insufficiently demonstrated at the standard · CF clear fail — clearly demonstrated below the standard.

The RCGP grades each domain CF, F, P or CP and weights clinical management and medical complexity against the other two domains; the examination's maximum is 126 over twelve cases, which is 10.5 per case. The RCGP does not publish the mark each grade carries. MD Acumen's training sheet uses CF 0 · F 1 · P 2 · CP 3, with clinical management weighted ×1.5 (0 · 1.5 · 3 · 4.5), so that a case is marked out of 10.5 and a twelve-case circuit out of 126. A P in all three domains is 7.0; MD Acumen treats that line as the training standard for a case. The examination's pass mark is set by borderline regression for each diet and is published in the RCGP's diet summary reports; it is not a fixed fraction of 126.

Weighting rationale, in the RCGP's words: “To reflect the capability coverage within the clinical management and medical complexity domain this is weighted in comparison to the other two domains.”

3 · Expanded station standard — what earns a clear pass, pass, fail and clear fail here

Written to the standard of a newly qualified independent GP; the clear-pass row describes practice above that standard. It is a debriefing aid, not a checklist: the grade is a judgement that the essentials, the italic key facts on the mark sheet, were done well, at the patient's pace and in plain language. MD Acumen training standard; the RCGP does not publish case mark sheets.

GradeData gathering and diagnosisClinical management and medical complexityRelating to others
CPReads this morning's readings against the growth record before she speaks and knows that the physical risk is the priority. Builds enough trust in the first three minutes that the eating history can be asked gently and answered honestly, using her own words rather than labels. Asks about self-harm and suicidal thoughts directly and kindly. Establishes capacity and who she trusts, uses the reception note as context without leading with it, and asks what she wants.Telephones the eating-disorder service the same day and says so, arranges same-day bloods and an ECG, explains in her words why the heart tracing and the blood tests matter today, and what would need the hospital. Involves her mother by agreement, with a route for the two of them to be told together, and explains that safety may require sharing. Documents capacity and the confidentiality decision. Gives a named contact and a follow-up within days.Speaks to her as the patient and explains confidentiality and its limits before she has to ask. Hears “I still feel big” and “My friend was in hospital for it” and responds to each. Names the fear of being made to eat and answers it: help, not force; a plan she is part of. Validates the courage it took to come. Negotiates her mother's involvement on her terms. Checks understanding in her own words.
PInterprets today's readings and the weight trend as physical risk. Takes the eating, exercise, purging and body-image history without accusation. Takes the menstrual history. Asks about the physical symptoms: dizziness, cold, hair loss, faintness. Asks about mood, self-harm and suicidality. Establishes her capacity to consent and the confidentiality context. Working diagnosis: an eating disorder with physical red flags.Refers immediately to the community eating-disorder service, with a same-day telephone discussion given the red flags and no BMI threshold applied. Same-day bloods (urea and electrolytes, glucose, magnesium, phosphate, full blood count, liver and thyroid function) and an ECG; urgent paediatric assessment if the red parameters are met. Involves a parent with consent where possible; the school nurse if agreed; a safeguarding discussion if risk escalates. Safety-net for fainting, chest pain, confusion. Follow-up within days with a named contact.Addresses her as the patient; explains confidentiality and its limits in her language before anything personal is asked. Non-judgemental about eating; responds to “I still feel big” and “My friend was in hospital for it”. Negotiates parental involvement on her terms rather than deciding for her. Checks understanding in her own words; separates help from force; validates the courage it took to come.
FAccepts iron and orders a blood test. Takes no eating history, or asks about diet in a way that invites “healthy”. Does not interpret the pulse of 52, the postural drop or the temperature. Does not ask about periods, self-harm or mood. Leads with the mother's call, so that she shuts down. Does not establish capacity or what she is willing for her mother to know.A blood test only, or a routine referral. No same-day discussion with the eating-disorder service. No ECG. The referral made to depend on a BMI threshold. Confidentiality breached to the mother without explanation, or the mother excluded from a plan that needs her. No safety-net. No named contact.Speaks as if to the mother. Lectures about eating. Ignores the note, or leads with it. Uses MEED, anorexia and refeeding as labels without explanation. Does not respond to “I still feel big”. Threatens with hospital. Does not ask what she wants.
CFNo eating history at all; today's readings not read or not interpreted; the mother's call used as the whole assessment; no question about self-harm or mood. Or a consultation conducted as an interrogation so that she leaves after three minutes with a blood form.Unsafe: a 16-year-old with a pulse of 52, a postural drop, a temperature of 35.9 and 15 kg lost sent away with a blood test and no referral; or a referral made for next month; or a plan that excludes her from every decision and breaches her confidence without explanation. She leaves at risk of a cardiac event with no one told.Dismissive, accusing or frightening; tells her she will be sectioned if she does not eat; talks to her about her mother's wishes rather than her own; ends with no idea what she has understood or agreed to. No trust, and a patient who will not come back.

Where candidates lose this station

  • Accepting “I think it's my iron” and ordering a blood test without an eating history, so that the readings are never interpreted (statement D6)
  • Leading with “your mum rang”, so that she shuts down and the consultation is over at minute two (statement R6)
  • Making the referral depend on a BMI threshold, or sending it as routine, for a girl with a pulse of 52 and a postural drop (statement C1)

What the examiner is listening for in the last four minutes

By 8:00 the working diagnosis should have been stated: an eating disorder with physical compromise. The examiner is listening for: the same-day call to the eating-disorder service and the same-day bloods and ECG, explained in her words; what would need the hospital; the limits of confidentiality said before they are needed and her mother involved by agreement; a safety-net that names fainting, chest pain, confusion and collapse; the named contact and the follow-up within days; and her own words on what happens next and what she wants from it.

4 · RCGP feedback statements — where underperformance was identified — with case-specific examples

The ten statements below are postulated: the feedback an examiner would most likely attach at this station, chosen from the RCGP's standardised list of 26 feedback statements that applies to every SCA case and spans the three marking domains (Data Gathering and Diagnosis; Clinical Management and Medical Complexity; Relating to Others). They are a prediction from the case content, its complexity and the marks that matter, not an examiner's record: any statement on the full list can be attached to any case, and feedback plays no part in the mark. Record the statements that applied in the practice log.

RCGP feedback statement (postulated top ten)Underperformance it signals (generic)Station-specific example
D1 · Data gathering was insufficient to enable safe assessment of the condition/situation
Data gathering and diagnosis · Data gathering and interpretation
History too thin to decide safely: the presenting problem not characterised, the essential negatives not asked.
  • Accepting “I think it's my iron” and ordering a blood test without an eating history, so that the readings are never interpreted.
  • Does not ask about periods, exercise or purging.
D2 · Existing information about the case was insufficiently utilised
Data gathering and diagnosis · Data gathering and interpretation; Organisation, management and leadership
The records, results or the referral note not read or not used; questions asked that the notes already answer.
  • Does not read the weight of 62 kg at 14 against 47 kg today.
  • Does not use this morning's pulse, blood pressure and temperature.
D6 · The implications of relevant findings identified during the data gathering were insufficiently recognised or understood
Data gathering and diagnosis · Data gathering and interpretation
A finding or result is elicited but its meaning is not recognised or not followed up.
  • Hears a pulse of 52, a postural drop and a temperature of 35.9 and calls them fine for her age.
  • Hears “I still feel big” from a girl of 47 kg and does not weigh it.
D7 · Differential diagnoses or hypotheses were inadequately generated or tested
Data gathering and diagnosis · Making diagnosis/decisions
One diagnosis assumed; alternatives not generated, or generated but not tested with a question.
  • Assumes thyroid or iron and never considers an eating disorder.
  • Considers an eating disorder and never considers the physical risk.
C1 · The management plan relating to referral was inappropriate or not reflective of current practice
Clinical management and medical complexity · Clinical management
Referral made when not indicated, omitted when indicated, or to the wrong service or urgency.
  • Making the referral depend on a BMI threshold, or sending it as routine, for a girl with a pulse of 52 and a postural drop.
  • Refers to the school nurse instead of the eating-disorder service.
C3 · The management plan relating to investigations was inappropriate or not reflective of current practice
Clinical management and medical complexity · Clinical management
Investigations ordered without purpose, omitted when needed, or not explained.
  • Orders a blood test for next week and no ECG.
  • Orders no electrolytes, glucose or phosphate.
C5 · The plan relating to the medical management of risk was inadequate or inappropriate
Clinical management and medical complexity · Clinical management; Organisation, management and leadership
Clinical risk left unmanaged: no plan for the thing that could go wrong, or the risk not weighed.
  • No safety-net for fainting, chest pain or collapse.
  • No plan for what happens if she does not attend the bloods.
R1 · Communication skills, including the non-verbal, responding to cues and/or active listening were insufficiently demonstrated
Relating to others · Communication and consultation skills
Cues missed; the patient interrupted; non-verbal signals ignored; questions read like a form.
  • Misses the hoodie, the glance at the scales and “I still feel big”.
  • Talks over “My friend was in hospital for it.”
R6 · Respect and/or sensitivity shown to the person was inadequate or inappropriate
Relating to others · Fitness to practise; Maintaining an ethical approach
Discourtesy, insensitivity to distress or to privacy; the person's dignity not protected.
  • Leading with “your mum rang”, so that she shuts down and the consultation is over at minute two.
  • Threatens her with being sectioned.
R9 · Safeguarding concerns were inadequately recognised or responded to
Relating to others · Practising holistically, promoting health and safeguarding
A safeguarding signal not recognised, not explored or not acted on.
  • Does not consider the brother who teases her, the separated parents and the scratching as a safeguarding picture to record and discuss. There is no abuse in this case, but the picture should be recorded.

The full list of 26 statements, with the generic meaning of each, is on the exam and the mark scheme.

5 · Examiner points of fact and guidelines

Points of fact the examiner should have to hand

Each statement is drawn from the named guideline, in its current version, with the date it was checked. The examiner marks against these facts; the candidate is not expected to quote them.

  1. Refer people with a suspected eating disorder immediately to a community eating-disorder service for assessment; do not use single measures such as BMI or duration of illness to determine whether to offer treatment; the service for children and young people offers a first appointment within one week for urgent cases. NICE — NG69 Eating disorders: recognition and treatment, section 1.2, identification and assessment; section 1.3, principles of care, 2017, last updated December 2020, checked 10 Oct 2026
  2. Medical risk markers in eating disorders include a heart rate below 50 (red below 40), a blood pressure below 90/60, a postural drop in systolic pressure of more than 20 mmHg, a temperature below 35.5 degrees, rapid weight loss (more than 1 kg a week), muscle weakness (unable to rise from a squat without arms) and electrolyte disturbance; several amber or red markers call for same-day assessment and an ECG. Royal College of Psychiatrists — CR233 Medical emergencies in eating disorders (MEED): guidance on recognition and management, risk assessment framework (table), May 2022, checked 10 Oct 2026
  3. Assess physical health in people with an eating disorder, including an ECG for those with a low heart rate or electrolyte disturbance, and blood tests including electrolytes, glucose, magnesium and phosphate; monitor for refeeding syndrome when nutrition is restarted. NICE — NG69 Eating disorders: recognition and treatment, section 1.9, physical health assessment and monitoring, 2017, last updated December 2020, checked 10 Oct 2026
  4. A young person aged 16 or 17 is presumed to have capacity to consent to their own treatment; confidentiality is owed to them as to an adult, and information is shared without consent only where it is necessary to protect them or others from serious harm, and then they are told what will be shared and why. GMC — 0 to 18 years: guidance for all doctors, paragraphs 24 to 29, assessing capacity; paragraphs 42 to 53, confidentiality, 2007, updated 2018, checked 10 Oct 2026
  5. Ask young people who present with low mood or an eating disorder about self-harm and suicidal thoughts directly; self-harm in a young person is assessed for risk and the person is offered follow-up and a safety plan. NICE — NG225 Self-harm: assessment, management and preventing recurrence, section 1.5, assessment and care by healthcare professionals, September 2022, checked 10 Oct 2026
  6. Secondary amenorrhoea (no period for three months or more in a woman with previously regular cycles) warrants assessment; low body weight and excessive exercise are among the causes, and a pregnancy test is part of the assessment. NICE CKS — Amenorrhoea, diagnosis: causes of secondary amenorrhoea, current online version, checked 10 Oct 2026
  7. Family members and carers of children and young people with an eating disorder should be involved in treatment where the young person agrees, and offered information and support; where the young person declines involvement, the clinician explores the reasons and keeps the question open. NICE — NG69 Eating disorders: recognition and treatment, section 1.1, general principles of care: working with family members and carers, 2017, last updated December 2020, checked 10 Oct 2026
  8. Be alert to an eating disorder in a young person with an unusually low or high body weight or BMI for age, rapid weight loss, dieting or restrictive eating, excessive exercise, amenorrhoea or other menstrual disturbance, social withdrawal, unexplained physical symptoms, or a family member reporting a change in eating; do not use a screening questionnaire such as SCOFF as the sole basis for deciding whether an eating disorder is present, and refer on clinical suspicion rather than waiting for a diagnosis. NICE — NG69 Eating disorders: recognition and treatment, section 1.2, identification and assessment, 2017, last updated December 2020, checked 10 Oct 2026
  9. First-line treatment of anorexia nervosa in a child or young person is outpatient: anorexia-nervosa-focused family therapy, delivered as single-family or multi-family sessions, typically 18 to 20 sessions over a year, with individual eating-disorder-focused CBT or adolescent-focused psychotherapy if family therapy is unacceptable or ineffective. Medication is not offered as the sole treatment. Admission is for a person whose physical health is severely compromised or who needs intensive support, and the aim is the least restrictive setting that is safe. NICE — NG69 Eating disorders: recognition and treatment, section 1.3, treating anorexia nervosa in children and young people; inpatient and day patient treatment, 2017, last updated December 2020, checked 10 Oct 2026
  10. High risk of refeeding syndrome is any one of: BMI below 16, unintentional weight loss of more than 15% in three to six months, little or no intake for more than 10 days, or low potassium, phosphate or magnesium before feeding; or any two of: BMI below 18.5, weight loss of more than 10% in three to six months, little intake for more than five days, or a history of alcohol misuse or certain drugs. A 15 kg loss from 62 kg is 24%: refeeding is supervised with electrolyte monitoring. NICE — CG32 Nutrition support for adults: oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition, section 1.4, what to give: people at high risk of refeeding problems, 2006, last updated August 2017, checked 10 Oct 2026
  11. A person with an eating disorder at high medical risk who refuses treatment has their capacity assessed for that decision, recognising that the illness itself can impair the ability to weigh the risk of not eating. Where capacity is lacking, or the criteria for detention are met, the Mental Health Act allows treatment of the disorder, and nutrition is treatment for anorexia nervosa under section 63. Compulsion is a last resort: engagement with the person and the family is sought first, and most treatment is voluntary. Royal College of Psychiatrists — CR233 Medical emergencies in eating disorders (MEED): guidance on recognition and management, legal and ethical considerations: capacity, consent and compulsory treatment, May 2022, checked 10 Oct 2026
  12. The Children and young people Topic Guide treats adolescents and young people aged 10 to 25 as a distinct group: the GP is expected to assess consent and competence in older children and adolescents, to apply the law and guidance on confidentiality when a parent asks for information, to be opportunistic in assessing mental wellbeing, to recognise eating disorders and self-harm early, to safeguard, and to work with CAMHS and the eating-disorder service while keeping the young person at the centre of decisions. RCGP — GP curriculum: Children and young people, Topic Guide: knowledge and skills, Being a GP, 2025 curriculum, checked 10 Oct 2026

Working references for this station

IssuerDocumentVersionChecked
NICENG69 Eating disorders: recognition and treatment2017, last updated December 202010 Oct 2026
Royal College of PsychiatristsCR233 Medical emergencies in eating disorders (MEED): guidance on recognition and managementMay 202210 Oct 2026
GMC0 to 18 years: guidance for all doctors2007, updated 201810 Oct 2026
NICENG225 Self-harm: assessment, management and preventing recurrenceSeptember 202210 Oct 2026
NICE CKSAmenorrhoeacurrent online version10 Oct 2026
NICECG32 Nutrition support for adults: oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition2006, last updated August 201710 Oct 2026
RCGPGP curriculum, Topic Guides: Children and young people · Mental health · Equality, diversity and inclusionBeing a GP, 2025 curriculum10 Oct 2026

12 statements, 754 words. Every statement is signed by the Course Director before it is published; a station whose facts have changed since signature carries no signature line until it is signed again.

6 · RCGP curriculum tags for this case
RCGP curriculum (2025)This case
Topic Guide(s)Children and young people · Mental health · Equality, diversity and inclusion
Core capabilitiesCommunicating and consulting · Data gathering and interpretation · An ethical approach · Holistic practice, health promotion and safeguarding
SCA Clinical Experience Group(s)Patient less than 19 years old · Mental health, including addiction, smoking, alcohol, substance misuse · Health disadvantage and vulnerabilities, including veterans, mental capacity, safeguarding, and communication difficulties
AKT blueprint clinical areaPsychiatry (broader representation)
Case typesafeguarding
Modalityvideo
7 · My marks and reflection — practice log form

Record your three domain grades, your case total out of 10.5, your global rating, the RCGP feedback statements that applied, and what you will keep and change. The form is already labelled with this case and its web address; a copy of your entry is emailed to you, so your practice log builds up in your inbox and can be downloaded.

Record my marks and reflection for SCA-14

Revision link for this case: mdacumen.com/sca-station14-weight-loss

Independence & scope. Formative training material from MD Acumen Ltd; not a prediction of exam performance. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or delivered on behalf of the Royal College of General Practitioners; the marking domains and feedback statements are the RCGP's published ones, and every descriptor on this page is an Acumen training tool calibrated to them. Clinical content reflects UK guidance at the date of editorial review — always check the current guideline. All patients are fictional.