MD Acumen · PLAB 2 OSCE / CPSA course · free practice resources
Practice case P2-21 · Colleague conversation · simulated practice manager

A worry about a senior partner — speaking to the practice manager

You are a Foundation Year 1 doctor on a general practice placement. The reception team have told you that they are worried about one of the senior partners, and you have asked to see the practice manager. (This station is one of a pair with P2-22: here you meet the practice manager, there you meet Dr Thornley. Each stands alone.)

Reviewed and kept current

Station family: Professionalism — raising a concern about a colleague · 8-minute station · 1 min 30 s reading · Last editorial review: 16 October 2026 · Next scheduled refresh: 11 April 2027.

Candidate instructions

Read this as you would outside the room

You have 1 minute 30 seconds to read, then 8 minutes. Candidates: everything below this section is folded away — leave it closed until you have finished the station.

Information
Your roleFoundation Year 1 doctor, three weeks into a four-month general practice placement. You are supervised in every session. Your clinical supervisor, Dr Diane Carver, is a partner at the practice; she is at a conference today and back tomorrow morning.
You are meetingMrs Jackie Rowntree, practice manager, in her office at 12:45. You asked for ten minutes.
BackgroundDonna, the reception lead, stopped you this morning: “We’re worried about Dr Thornley. Someone needs to say something.” Dr Michael Thornley, 58, is the senior partner. He is not your supervisor.
What you have seen and been toldTuesday: Dr Thornley arrived 45 minutes late for his 8:30 surgery; no explanation given. Yesterday 9:15: you heard him on the telephone to a patient — his speech was slurred and he repeated himself; later you saw him walk unsteadily along the corridor and knock a trolley. Donna says his surgeries have overrun by about an hour most days for a month, that two prescription queries sat unanswered for a week, and that a patient asked at the desk last week whether “Dr Thornley is all right”. The secretary found an unsent suspected-cancer referral in his tray six days after he dictated it.
TodayDr Thornley has a full afternoon surgery at 14:00 (16 patients booked) and is the duty doctor tomorrow.

Your task

•
Tell Mrs Rowntree what you have seen and been told, and find out what she knows.
•
Agree what needs to happen about this afternoon, and who else needs to know.
•
Agree what you will each do next.
Folded away

For the actor and the examiner

1 · Actor script — role player only

Candidates: do not open until you have consulted.

Persona and manner

  • Jackie Rowntree, 51, practice manager for nine years. Capable, loyal to the partners, and fond of Dr Thornley — he recruited you. You are sympathetic to the young doctor, but your instinct is to keep this in-house and quiet: “a quiet word, no fuss”.
  • You are not hostile. You become defensive only if the doctor uses labels (“alcoholic”, “drunk”) or threatens to go straight to the GMC.

Opening line — say this verbatim

  • “Come in, sit down. Donna said you wanted a word about Dr Thornley. Look — he’s had a dreadful year. I’d rather we didn’t make a fuss. What is it you’ve seen?”

Volunteer freely if given the space

  • You know he has been late a few times and that his surgeries overrun — “he’s always been thorough”.
  • You have not heard about the slurred phone call or the corridor. If told, you go quiet: “I didn’t know that.”
  • Your plan, unless challenged: “Leave it with me. I’ll have a quiet word with him when the time’s right — maybe next week.”

Only if asked

  • If asked directly what you know, or whether anyone has raised this before: the partners talked about his lateness at a partners’ meeting two months ago and agreed to “keep an eye on things”. Nothing was written down.
  • If asked why he has had a dreadful year: his wife, Catherine, died in March. He took two weeks off and came straight back.
  • If asked about complaints: there was a written complaint last week from a patient whose referral was delayed. You have not yet told the partners; you were going to take it to the next meeting.
  • If asked who else is in the building this afternoon: Dr Joanna Petrie, another partner, is in; she finishes her own surgery at 13:30. Dr Carver can be reached on her mobile. A locum agency can usually find someone for tomorrow’s duty session at a day’s notice.
  • If asked about the practice’s policy: there is a raising-concerns (speaking-up) policy on the shared drive; you wrote it for the CQC inspection and “nobody has ever used it”. The practice does not have its own Freedom to Speak Up guardian; you believe the integrated care board or the primary care network has one — you would have to look up the number.
  • If asked whether you have noticed anything about his health, or anything else that worries you about him: “It’s not my place to say.” If pressed, kindly and without judgement: “He’s lost weight. His hands shake in the mornings. That’s all I’m going to say.” If asked directly about drinking: “It’s not my place to say.” You never use the words “drink” or “alcohol” yourself.

Impact on daily life — the practice and its patients (only if asked)

  • Reception are stressed: patients complain about the overrunning, and two receptionists have asked not to work the desk on his surgery days.
  • The other partners are quietly picking up his unanswered tasks. Dr Petrie has been staying until seven.
  • You lie awake about it. You feel disloyal even having this conversation.

Ideas, concerns and expectations

  • Idea: that he is grieving and exhausted and will “come right” given time and kindness.
  • Concerns: that a formal process will finish him — “he’s two years off retiring”; that the practice cannot run without him; that the FY1 doctor will “go over everyone’s heads”.
  • Expectation: that the doctor tells you what they have seen and then leaves it to you.

Cues to deliver, timed

  • Minute 2: “You know his wife died in March? He’s not been himself since.”
  • Minute 4, if the doctor has not yet asked about this afternoon’s surgery: look at the clock — “He’s got sixteen booked at two.”
  • Minute 6, if the doctor has not said who else should know: “So this stays between us, yes?”

If the doctor summarises and asks whether you want to add anything

  • If the partners’ meeting two months ago has not come out: “There is something. The partners did talk about his lateness, back in the summer. They decided to keep an eye on it. Nothing was written down. I suppose that doesn’t look very good now.”
  • If it has: “The complaint last week — about the referral. I haven’t told the partners yet. I should, shouldn’t I?”

How to respond to the doctor

  • If the doctor gives specific, dated, factual observations without labels: you listen, you stop defending, and you say “I didn’t realise it had got to that.”
  • If the doctor asks whether any patient is at risk today and suggests that Dr Thornley should not run this afternoon’s surgery unassessed: resist once — “We can’t just cancel sixteen patients” — then, if the doctor explains why and offers practical options (Dr Petrie, Dr Carver by phone, a locum, rebooking), agree: “All right. I’ll speak to Dr Petrie as soon as she’s out of surgery, and we’ll ask Dr Thornley to sit down with her before two.”
  • If the doctor says it must go to a partner today and that they will tell Dr Carver tomorrow: accept it — “Fine. Dr Petrie, then Dr Carver. And I’ll write up what you’ve told me.”
  • If the doctor agrees to keep it between the two of you, or accepts “leave it with me, I’ll have a word next week”: you are relieved — “Thank you. I knew you’d be sensible.” Say nothing more. (This is the unsafe outcome.)
  • If the doctor calls him an alcoholic, says he is drunk, or says they will report him to the GMC today: bristle — “You can’t say that. You’ve been here three weeks.” Stay defensive until the doctor returns to what they actually saw.
  • If the doctor asks what support is available for Dr Thornley: you do not know; you would welcome suggestions.
  • If the doctor mentions the speaking-up policy, the Freedom to Speak Up guardian, NHS England or the GMC as the route if the practice does not act: do not take offence provided it is said as information, not a threat — “I understand. We’ll deal with it properly.”

Do not

  • Volunteer the partners’ meeting, the complaint, or the morning shakes unless asked — or invited to add anything (apart from the timed cues).
  • Offer a diagnosis, or use the words “drink”, “drunk” or “alcohol” yourself.
  • Agree to anything formal before the doctor has made the case for today’s patients.
2 · Examiner mark sheet — generic scheme plus the key facts for this case

Domain marks — with the key facts that earn a 4 at this station

Domain (GMC wording) · key facts for this case1234Score
1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skills
  • Gives specific, dated, first-hand observations (late Tuesday; slurred call and unsteady corridor yesterday) separately from what reception reported — no labels, no diagnosis
  • Establishes immediate risk: surgery of 16 at 14:00, duty doctor tomorrow, the unsent cancer referral, unanswered prescription queries
  • Finds out what the manager already knows — partners’ meeting two months ago, the bereavement, last week’s complaint — and whether anything was written down
  • Her ideas, concerns and expectations (grief, “no fuss”, fear for his job) and the impact on reception, the other partners and patients; red flags for patient harm asked about directly
☐☐☐☐/4
2 · Clinical management skills
  • Summary-and-check, then the formulation: a colleague whose health or performance may be putting patients at risk — not the FY1’s to diagnose; needs a partner today and independent assessment
  • Today: a partner (Dr Petrie, or Dr Carver by phone) told before 14:00; Dr Thornley sees no patients unassessed; cover for surgery and tomorrow’s duty; referral and queries actioned
  • No secrecy agreed; names the route if the practice does not act (speaking-up policy, Freedom to Speak Up guardian, NHS England, GMC) as information; dated note; tells Dr Carver tomorrow
  • Safety-net: Dr Thornley about to see patients unassessed, or a patient harmed → a partner told at once; nothing done within 48 hours → candidate escalates (supervisor, foundation school, NHS England, GMC) · Follow-up: dated note today; Dr Carver tomorrow; manager reports back by Friday
☐☐☐☐/4
3 · Interpersonal skills
  • Kind about Dr Thornley and about the manager’s loyalty; no blame for the practice having “kept an eye”
  • Firm without threatening — “I can’t promise to keep this between us; patients come first”
  • Says what they will do themselves, rather than instructing the manager
  • Checks what the manager will do, by when, and that the plan is shared
☐☐☐☐/4
Station total/12

Domain score (educational construct):

ScoreDescriptor
1Unsatisfactory (did not achieve safe FY2 standard)
2Borderline (just achieving minimum safe FY2 standard)
3Satisfactory (competent and safe FY2 standard)
4Good (exceeds FY2 standard)

This 1–4 domain score and its descriptors are an Acumen educational construct: the GMC publishes the three marking domains and the four-mark maximum, but not the descriptors its examiners use, and it does not publish station mark sheets. See Legal & Regulatory.

Marks are 1 to 4 in each domain; the generic descriptor for each mark is on the mark scheme page, and the structure of the eight minutes is on the 8-minute station page. The full standard for this case is in section 3 and the GMC feedback statements, with examples from this case, are in section 4.

3 · Expanded station-specific marking standard — what earns 4, 3, 2 and 1 here

The top row is the full picture of what a competent FY2 could do at this station, including the working diagnosis with its justified differentials, the safety-net and the follow-up; lower rows describe how performance falls away. It is a debriefing aid, not a checklist to recite: nobody says every line in eight minutes, and a 4 is a judgement that the essentials — the italic key facts on the mark sheet — were done well, in plain language and at the patient’s pace. Acumen training standard — the GMC does not publish station mark sheets.

MarkDomain 1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skillsDomain 2 · Clinical management skillsDomain 3 · Interpersonal skills
4
  • Opens by saying why they have come and what they want from the meeting — ten minutes, a concern about patient safety, not a complaint about a person
  • Reports first-hand observations with dates and times (late Tuesday; slurred, repetitive telephone call and unsteady walk yesterday) and separates them from what reception reported (overrunning, unanswered queries, the patient’s question, the unsent referral) — facts, not conclusions
  • Asks what the manager and the partners already know, whether it has been raised before and whether anything was recorded
  • Asks about immediate risk: who he is due to see this afternoon, the duty session tomorrow, whether any patient has already come to harm (the referral, the queries, the complaint) — the station’s red flags
  • Credit if offered, not required for a 4 (the route itself is credited in Domain 2): asks about the practice’s own policy for raising concerns and whether it has a Freedom to Speak Up guardian or access to one
  • Explores her ideas, concerns and expectations: grief as the explanation, fear of a formal process, the wish for a quiet word, what she expects of the FY1
  • Asks about impact on the practice and its patients — reception, the other partners, complaints
  • Summarises what has been said and asks whether the manager wants to add anything — which is when the partners’ meeting or the complaint comes out
  • Working diagnosis (or formulation) with justified differentials: a senior colleague whose health or performance may be putting patients at risk now; the pattern has several possible health-related explanations and it is neither the FY1’s nor the manager’s place to name or guess at one; what matters is that the risk is real today, that he needs an independent assessment by his own doctor, and that the practice can no longer “keep an eye” on it. (Examiner note: the differential — alcohol, bereavement and depression, medication, sleep deprivation, physical illness — is for the examiner’s understanding; a candidate who names alcohol to the manager should not score 4 in Domain 3.)
  • Patient safety today: a partner is told before 14:00 (Dr Petrie in the building; Dr Carver by phone); Dr Thornley is asked to sit down with a partner before he sees anyone; options for the surgery (Dr Petrie, rebooking, a locum) and for tomorrow’s duty session; the unsent referral and the queries actioned today
  • Does not agree to keep it between the two of them and explains why in one sentence: a patient-safety concern has to go to someone who can act on it — a partner — and the candidate will tell their own supervisor; the candidate’s duty is discharged by raising it properly, not by proving it
  • Names, as information rather than threat, the route if the practice does not act: the practice’s speaking-up policy and the Freedom to Speak Up guardian; NHS England (which oversees GP practices and is a prescribed body under the whistleblowing law); the GMC if patients remain at risk — after advice from a defence organisation, the BMA or the GMC confidential helpline
  • Suggests what the practice can offer him — his own GP, NHS Practitioner Health, the LMC’s pastoral support, occupational health, time off — so that the conversation is about help as well as risk. Credit if offered, not required for a 4: that the partners may need to inform the responsible officer at NHS England, and that the delayed referral and the complaint should be reviewed as patient-safety incidents
  • Agrees what each person will do and by when; the candidate will make a dated factual note and tell Dr Carver tomorrow
  • Safety-net: if Dr Thornley arrives to run this afternoon’s surgery or tomorrow’s duty session without having been seen by a partner, or if either of you learns that a patient has come to harm, the candidate or the manager speaks to Dr Petrie or Dr Carver immediately rather than waiting; if the practice has not acted within 48 hours the candidate escalates — clinical supervisor, foundation school, the speaking-up policy and Freedom to Speak Up guardian, then NHS England or the GMC — after taking advice from a defence organisation, the BMA or the GMC confidential helpline; if Dr Thornley says anything that suggests he is a danger to himself, that is an emergency for his own doctor or 999, not a matter for discretion.
  • Follow-up: the candidate writes a dated, factual, confidential note of what they observed, what they were told and what was agreed, kept outside the patient record; the manager speaks to Dr Petrie before 14:00 today and records the conversation; the candidate tells Dr Carver (clinical supervisor) tomorrow morning and asks for a debrief, and reflects on it with their educational supervisor; the manager tells the candidate by Friday what has been done — not the details of Dr Thornley’s health; the partners consider whether the responsible officer at NHS England needs to be informed and whether the delayed referral and the complaint are patient-safety incidents to be reviewed.
  • Respectful of the manager’s loyalty and of Dr Thornley — talks about a colleague who may be unwell, not a problem to be reported; does not diagnose or speculate about alcohol, and receives any mention of weight loss or tremor without comment
  • Acknowledges the bereavement with warmth and does not use it to explain away the risk
  • Keeps to first-person facts: “I heard”, “I saw”, “Donna told me” — and says plainly what they do not know
  • Declines secrecy without threatening: “I can’t promise that. Patients come first, and I’d be failing him too if I said nothing.”
  • Shares the burden: offers to be present when a partner is told, and to write down what they saw
  • Closes by checking the plan back and thanking her
3Observations given clearly and today’s surgery raised; one of the earlier partners’ discussion, the unsent referral or the manager’s own concerns not explored.A partner is told today, the surgery is covered, secrecy declined, Dr Carver to be told tomorrow; one of the external route, the written note, the support available to Dr Thornley or the review of the referral missing.Clear, kind and firm; a little lecturing when the external route is mentioned, or the manager’s own distress not acknowledged.
2A mixture of hearsay and opinion (“everyone says he’s drinking”); today’s patients not asked about until the manager prompts; little curiosity about what the practice already knows.A partner is to be told, but not until tomorrow; today’s surgery unresolved after a brief protest; the external route unmentioned; no note.Either apologetic to the point of retreat (“I’m probably overreacting”) or managerial and cold; the bereavement cue missed; the manager left feeling accused.
1Vague (“people are a bit worried about him”), or so apologetic that the concern never lands; no facts, no dates, no question about today. Or unsafe: never asks whether any patient is at risk today, or what the practice already knows.Insists a partner is told today but the surgery and tomorrow’s duty cover are not arranged; no record; or the only plan is “I’ll ring the GMC”. Or unsafe: accepts “leave it with me” or “a quiet word next week” with no partner told today; or agrees to say nothing, or to keep it between the candidate and the manager; or lets a partner who may be unfit see patients this afternoon without anyone assessing him.Accusatory towards Dr Thornley or the practice; or so vague that the manager cannot tell what is being asked of her. Or unsafe: threatens the manager (“if you don’t act I’m going straight to the GMC”) as the opening move; or belittles the receptionists’ concerns; or mocks Dr Thornley; or states as fact that he is drunk or an alcoholic, or proposes to confront him publicly.
4 · GMC feedback statements — where underperformance was identified — with case-specific examples

A feedback statement marks where underperformance was identified in the consultation. With PLAB 2 results the GMC may attach any combination of the ten statements to a station — none, one or several. The right-hand column shows what each one looks like at this station. Record the statements that applied in the practice log.

GMC feedback statementUnderperformance it signals (generic)Case-specific examples
1 · ConsultationDisorganised or unstructured consultationNo structure — the observations, the gossip and the plan come out in one breath; never says what the meeting is for; no summary before the plan.
2 · IssuesKey issues or priorities not recognisedTreats this as a complaint about lateness and overrunning; does not see that the issues are patient safety this afternoon and a colleague who may be unwell.
3 · TimePoor time managementSix minutes on the back-story and the bereavement; the bell goes before anyone has asked who is seeing the sixteen patients at two o’clock.
4 · FindingsAbnormal findings or results, or their implications, not identifiedIs told about the unsent suspected-cancer referral and the morning tremor and does not recognise them as evidence that patients are already at risk; does not ask whether anything was written down two months ago.
5 · ExaminationPhysical examination or use of instruments not competentNo clinical examination at this station: what stands in for it is the quality of the evidence — first-hand, dated, factual — and the candidate who says “everyone says he’s drinking” has examined nothing.
6 · DiagnosisWorking diagnosis or differential diagnoses not correctDecides and announces the diagnosis — “he’s clearly an alcoholic” — or, at the other extreme, “it’s just grief, he’ll be fine”; no acknowledgement that the cause is unknown and needs an independent assessment.
7 · ManagementManagement plan not reflecting current best practice“Leave it with me. I’ll have a quiet word with him when the time’s right” accepted; no partner told today; nothing said about what happens if the practice does not act; no note made; no follow-up with Dr Carver; the delayed referral left in the tray.
8 · RapportRapport and sensitivity to the patient’s feelings and concerns not shownLectures the manager about her duties; or apologises so much (“I know it’s not my place”) that she takes the concern as trivial; the bereavement cue (“he’s had a dreadful year”) brushed aside.
9 · ListeningVerbal and non-verbal cues not used; poor active listeningDoes not hear “So this stays between us, yes?” as the moment to decline secrecy; never asks what she already knows, so the partners’ meeting and the complaint are never mentioned.
10 · LanguageLanguage or explanations not understandable; understanding not checked“Under GMP paragraph 75 I have a duty to escalate to the RO or the GMC under PIDA if your FTSU route fails” — to a practice manager, in the first two minutes.
5 · Examiner points of fact and guidelines

Points of fact the examiner should have to hand

  1. Good medical practice (GMC, 2024; in effect 30 January 2024, updated 13 December 2024 to cover physician and anaesthesia associates): paragraph 75 — you must act promptly if you think patient safety or dignity is, or may be, seriously compromised; third bullet of paragraph 75 — if you have concerns that a colleague may not be fit to practise and may be putting patients at risk, you must ask for advice from a colleague, your defence body or the GMC, and if still concerned you must report it in line with your workplace policy and the GMC’s guidance on raising concerns. Paragraph 51 — you must be compassionate towards colleagues who have problems with their performance or health, but you must put patient safety first at all times. Paragraph 76 — those in a leadership or management role must make sure concerns raised with them are dealt with promptly and adequately.
  2. Raising and acting on concerns about patient safety (GMC, 2012; updated 13 December 2024): paragraph 10 — you do not need to wait for proof; you can justify raising a concern if you do so honestly, on the basis of reasonable belief and through appropriate channels, even if you turn out to be mistaken; the duty to protect patients overrides personal and professional loyalties. Paragraph 12 — if patients may be at risk of death or serious harm, report the concern immediately. Paragraph 13 — raise it first with your manager or an appropriate officer, such as a practice partner; if the concern is about a partner, it may be appropriate to raise it outside the practice (the medical director or clinical governance lead for the organisation); a doctor in training may raise it with a named person in their training organisation. Paragraph 14 — be clear, honest and objective. Paragraph 15 — keep a record of the concern and the steps taken. Paragraph 16 — go to the GMC or another body with authority to investigate if you cannot raise it locally, if local channels have not acted adequately, or if there is an immediate serious risk. Paragraph 18 — advice from a senior colleague, the GMC confidential helpline, a defence body, the BMA or the charity Protect.
  3. The GMC’s own list of useful contacts gives the GMC confidential helpline as 0161 923 6399, Protect (protect-advice.org.uk) and the NHS whistleblowing helpline (speakup.direct). Protect’s advice line is 0203 117 2520 (limited weekday hours; check protect-advice.org.uk); Speak Up Direct is 08000 724 725 (check speakup.direct for hours).
  4. Freedom to Speak Up: NHS England’s national speak up policy (June 2022) is the minimum standard for all organisations providing NHS care in primary and secondary care in England, and applies to all workers — including trainees, locums, students, agency and bank staff. Routes: line manager, a senior manager or partner, the practice’s Freedom to Speak Up guardian (which may sit outside the practice, for example at the integrated care board, primary care network or federation), then externally to the Care Quality Commission, NHS England (which oversees GP surgeries) or the relevant professional regulator. The National Guardian’s Office closed on 30 June 2026 and NHS England has delivered some of its activities since 1 July 2026. All organisations, including primary care providers and integrated care boards, must publish how to contact their guardian; primary care’s national data collection is paused for 2026/27, and NHS England is reviewing its expectations of primary care providers during 2026/27 — check the current position before teaching the detail.
  5. Legal protection: the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (which inserted Part IVA into the Employment Rights Act 1996) protects workers who make a ‘protected disclosure’ — including that the health or safety of any individual is, or is likely to be, endangered — from detriment and dismissal. Disclosures to the employer are protected; so are disclosures to a ‘prescribed person’, and the Care Quality Commission, the General Medical Council and NHS England are all prescribed persons for health matters (check the current gov.uk list). The Employment Rights Act 2025 adds sexual harassment as a category of protected disclosure from 6 April 2026. The criteria are technical: Protect or a defence organisation can advise. GMC Raising concerns paragraph 8: a doctor must not sign agreements that restrict raising patient-safety concerns; clauses intended to stop a protected disclosure are void in law.
  6. A GP partner is a self-employed contractor, not an employee — but the GMC’s duties apply regardless, and the practice is a CQC-registered provider with its own duty to have arrangements for staff to raise concerns. Every GP on the England performers list has a responsible officer in NHS England (the regional medical director’s team), who has statutory duties under the Medical Profession (Responsible Officers) Regulations 2010 to respond to concerns about a doctor’s conduct, health or performance; (GP contracts are now commissioned by most integrated care boards under delegation; the responsible-officer function stays with NHS England) — the partners, not the FY1, would normally be the ones to contact the responsible officer, after taking advice from the local medical committee (LMC) and their defence organisations. (Current NHS England process documents for performer concerns date from 2013–2019 — to confirm locally.)
  7. The practice’s own duties: the unsent suspected-cancer referral, the unanswered prescription queries and the delayed-referral complaint are patient-safety incidents in their own right: GP practices in England record patient-safety events directly on the national Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service (the NRLS was decommissioned on 30 June 2024), and must notify the CQC of certain incidents (see the CQC notification requirements). A delayed cancer referral may also engage the statutory duty of candour (regulation 20).
  8. Support the practice can offer a colleague: his own GP — Good medical practice paragraph 77 says a doctor registered with a GP should choose one outside their family and workplace, and paragraph 79 that a doctor whose judgement or performance could be affected by a condition must consult a suitably qualified professional and follow their advice, not rely on their own assessment; NHS Practitioner Health (a free, confidential NHS mental-health and addiction treatment service for health and care staff in England, including doctors, whose needs cannot easily be met locally because of their professional role; self-referral only; not an occupational health or crisis service — 0300 0303 300; practitionerhealth.nhs.uk; check the eligibility page before relying on it); the BMA’s confidential counselling and peer-support line, 0330 123 1245, free 24 hours a day to any doctor or medical student whether or not a BMA member; the LMC’s pastoral or GP-support service (arrangements vary by LMC); occupational health where the practice has access to it; the Sick Doctors Trust helpline for doctors worried about alcohol or drugs (0370 444 5163, 24 hours).
  9. What the FY1 should not do: confront Dr Thornley in front of staff or patients; tell the manager he is drunk or an alcoholic; agree to a private arrangement that leaves him seeing patients; take the story to the reception team; or go straight to the GMC before the practice has had the chance to act — unless patients are at immediate serious risk and nobody will act (GMC paragraph 16). A provisionally registered FY1 is supervised throughout; raising the concern with the supervisor and the foundation school is both allowed and expected (GMC paragraph 13).
  10. Documentation: a dated, factual, first-hand note of what was observed, what was reported and by whom, what was discussed and what was agreed — kept confidentially and not in any patient’s record (Good medical practice paragraphs 69–71; Raising concerns paragraph 15). The note protects the candidate, the manager and Dr Thornley alike.

Where candidates lose marks at this station

  • “Everyone says he’s drinking.”
  • Agreeing that it stays between the two of you.
  • Never asking who is seeing the sixteen patients at two o’clock.
  • Opening with the GMC.
  • Making no note.
  • Forgetting the unsent cancer referral is a patient-safety incident in its own right.

Guidelines for this station

6 · MLA content map tags for this case
MLA content mapThis station
Domain 1 · Areas of clinical practiceGeneral practice and primary healthcare
Domain 3 · Clinical and professional capabilitiesLegal and ethical responsibilities · Team working · Managing risk · Using and recording information safely · Reflective practice
Domain 5 · Patient presentationsSelf-neglect · Wellbeing checks
Domain 6 · ConditionsNo single condition — professional capability station
Station familyAcute care, ethics and safeguarding — Professionalism — raising a concern about a colleague
7 · My marks and reflection — practice log form

Record your three domain marks, your station total, the GMC feedback statements that applied (where underperformance was identified), and what you will keep and change. The form is already labelled with this case and its web address; a copy of your entry is emailed to you, so your practice log builds up in your inbox and can be downloaded.

Record my marks and reflection for P2-21

Revision link for this case: mdacumen.com/plab-2-osce/case-21-a-worry-about-a-senior-partner

Independence & scope. Independent, formative training material from MD Acumen Ltd. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or delivered on behalf of the General Medical Council. The GMC does not publish its station mark sheets: every mark scheme and descriptor on these pages is an Acumen training tool calibrated to the GMC's published marking domains, feedback statements and the MLA content map. Practice scores are not a prediction of examination performance. Clinical content reflects UK guidance at the date of editorial review — always check the current guideline. All patients are fictional. This course never provides, and will never ask you to share, real GMC exam content — full regulatory statement: Legal & Regulatory.