MD Acumen · PLAB 2 OSCE / CPSA course · free practice resources
Practice case P2-22 · Colleague conversation · simulated senior partner

A quiet word with a colleague — informal support for a senior partner

You are a Foundation Year 1 doctor on a general practice placement. The reception team have told you that they are worried about the senior partner, and you have decided to have a quiet, informal word with him before anything formal happens. (This station is an alternative to P2-21, not its sequel: in this version you have not yet spoken to the practice manager. Each stands alone.)

Reviewed and kept current

Station family: Professionalism — a conversation with a colleague you are worried about · 8-minute station · 1 min 30 s reading · Last editorial review: 16 October 2026 · Next scheduled refresh: 11 April 2027.

Candidate instructions

Read this as you would outside the room

You have 1 minute 30 seconds to read, then 8 minutes. Candidates: everything below this section is folded away — leave it closed until you have finished the station.

Information
Your roleFoundation Year 1 doctor, three weeks into a four-month general practice placement. You are supervised in every session. Your clinical supervisor, Dr Diane Carver, is a partner at the practice; she is at a conference today and back tomorrow morning.
You are meetingDr Michael Thornley, 58, the senior partner — not your supervisor. It is 18:10; his last patient has gone. You have knocked on his door and asked for a few minutes. Nobody else is in the building apart from the cleaner.
BackgroundDonna, the reception lead, stopped you this morning: “We’re worried about Dr Thornley. Someone needs to say something.” You have seen some of it yourself. Tuesday: he arrived 45 minutes late for his 8:30 surgery. Yesterday 9:15: you heard him on the telephone to a patient — his speech was slurred and he repeated himself; later you saw him walk unsteadily along the corridor and knock a trolley. Donna says his surgeries have overrun by about an hour most days for a month, two prescription queries sat unanswered for a week, and the secretary found an unsent suspected-cancer referral in his tray six days after he dictated it.
TomorrowDr Thornley is the duty doctor from 08:00.

Your task

•
Tell Dr Thornley, kindly and specifically, what you and others have noticed, and find out how he is.
•
Offer support and tell him where he can get help.
•
Be clear with him about what you will do next, and agree what he will do.
Folded away

For the actor and the examiner

1 · Actor script — role player only

Candidates: do not open until you have consulted.

Persona and manner

  • Michael Thornley, 58, senior partner, 24 years in the practice. Tall, tired, courteous. Your wife Catherine died in March, seven months ago, after a short illness; you took two weeks off and came straight back “because the practice needed me”. Two grown-up children who live away.
  • Start defensive and minimising — a little brittle, slightly amused that an FY1 has come to see you. If the doctor gives at least one dated observation and then asks how you are, without using the words “alcoholic”, “drunk” or “drinking”, you crumble: tearful, ashamed, relieved to be asked. If the doctor uses any of those words as a label, you stay courteous and closed and bring the conversation to an end.

Opening line — say this verbatim

  • “Come in. You look very serious. If it’s about the referral, I’ve sorted it. What can I do for you?”

Volunteer freely if given the space

  • You are “tired, that’s all”. You know you have been running late — “my patients are complicated”.
  • You have not been sleeping — three or four hours a night since Catherine died.
  • If the doctor describes what they saw yesterday (the slurred call, the corridor): first “I had a migraine” — then, if they stay gentle, silence, and “I wondered if anyone had noticed.”

Only if asked

  • Alcohol — release in stages, only to direct, non-judgemental questions. “Are you drinking more than you used to?” → “A couple of whiskies at night. It helps me sleep.” “How much is a couple?” → “Half a bottle, some nights. More at the weekend.” “Ever during the day, or before work?” → “Never before surgery.” Do not admit to the lunchtime drink unless the doctor summarises and invites you to add anything (see below). If the doctor asks “you’re not drinking in the day, are you?” (a leading question) you say “No” and nothing more.
  • Mornings: “My hands shake in the mornings” and you feel sick until mid-morning; “it settles”. You have lost about six kilos; you do not cook for one.
  • Mood: flat, no pleasure in anything, dreading the mornings, snapping at reception. If asked directly about thoughts of harming yourself or ending your life: “No. I’ve thought I’d rather not wake up. I wouldn’t do anything — the children have lost enough.” No plans, no previous attempts.
  • Your own doctor: you are registered at a practice across town but have not been for eleven years — “I don’t need a GP, I am one.” Three weeks ago you wrote yourself a prescription for zopiclone, 7.5 mg, fourteen tablets — “once; I know I shouldn’t have”. No other medicines. No illicit drugs.
  • Physical health: no headaches apart from “the migraines”, no weakness, no falls apart from the trolley; blood pressure not checked for years.
  • Driving: you drive to work, 20 minutes; never after a drink in the evening — “I’m not stupid.”
  • Work: you know the referral was found in your tray. You have not told the partners about the complaint letter you received last week. You feel you have let patients down and that “the practice would fall apart without me — the other two can’t cover the duty days.”
  • What you have told anyone: nobody. Your daughter rings on Sundays and you tell her you are fine.

Impact on daily life — home and work (only if asked)

  • Home: the house is a mess; you eat toast; the garden Catherine loved has gone to seed. You sit up with the whisky and the television until two.
  • Work: you dread the mornings; you are getting through surgeries by “ploughing on”; you have stopped going to the practice meeting because you cannot face the other partners.
  • Money and family: no money worries. You have not visited Catherine’s grave since the funeral.

Ideas, concerns and expectations

  • Idea: that this is grief and exhaustion and will pass; that you are “coping, just”.
  • Concerns: that if the practice manager or the partners get involved it goes to the GMC, you lose your licence two years before you planned to retire, and your patients find out; that the practice cannot run without you; that the FY1 will “put this on paper”.
  • Expectation: that the young doctor, having said their piece, will keep it to themselves — “you’re a decent sort, I can tell.”

Cues to deliver, timed

  • Minute 2, when the doctor describes what they saw: “I had a migraine yesterday, if you must know.” (Then, if they stay gentle: “I wondered if anyone had noticed.”)
  • Minute 4, if the doctor has not asked how you are sleeping, eating or coping: pause, look at Catherine’s photograph on the desk — “Seven months on Thursday.”
  • Minute 5, if sleep medication has not been mentioned: “Could you write me something for sleep? Just a few zopiclone, off the record.” (If the doctor agrees, accept warmly — this is the unsafe outcome.)
  • Minute 6, if the doctor has not yet said what they will do with this conversation: “This is between us, of course. You wouldn’t go to Jackie with it.”

If the doctor summarises and asks whether you want to add anything

  • If the lunchtime drink has not come out: “There is something. Yesterday — I had a drink at lunchtime. Just one, in the car, before the afternoon surgery. I’ve never done that before. That’s what you heard on the phone, probably.”
  • If it has: “What happens to me now? Honestly. Will I be struck off?”

How to respond to the doctor

  • If the doctor gives specific observations (the late Tuesday, the telephone call, the corridor) and then asks how you are, in any words, without saying “alcoholic”, “drunk” or “drinking”: you become tearful and start to talk — “I’m not managing. I haven’t been managing since March.”
  • If the doctor says they are worried about you as a person before they mention patients: you soften much faster.
  • If the doctor labels you (“alcoholic”, “drunk at work”) or lectures you about the GMC: you go cold — “Thank you for your concern. I think we’re done here.” Only re-engage if they apologise and return to what they saw and to how you are.
  • If the doctor asks whether you have thought of harming yourself: answer honestly (see above) and be grateful they asked.
  • If the doctor suggests your own GP, NHS Practitioner Health, the BMA line or time off, and explains what each offers: you are sceptical at first (“and tell them what?”), then willing — especially if they offer to sit with you while you ring, or to help you tell Dr Carver yourself tomorrow.
  • If the doctor says plainly that they cannot keep this to themselves, that patients may be at risk, and that they will speak to Dr Carver or the practice manager tomorrow — but that they would far rather you told them yourself first: resist once — “You’d finish me” — then, if they repeat the plan and offer to sit with you while you ring, accept it: “I suppose I knew that when I let you in. I’ll ring Diane tonight.” (Raise the duty session yourself only if the doctor has raised it.)
  • If the doctor promises to keep it secret, or offers to prescribe for you, or agrees that you can carry on and “see how it goes”: you are relieved, thank them warmly and show them out. (This is the unsafe outcome.)
  • If the doctor asks about the duty session tomorrow and you have admitted the lunchtime drink: you agree you should not do it, and that Dr Petrie or a locum must be found tonight. If the doctor does not ask, you say nothing about it.
  • If the doctor suggests that you should not be driving after the whisky, or asks about it: you agree you will take a taxi tonight, and not drive in the morning either.
  • If the doctor says that, if you have not rung Dr Carver by an agreed time tonight, they will ring her themselves: a pause — “You would, wouldn’t you. All right. Nine o’clock.”

Do not

  • Volunteer the lunchtime drink, the self-prescribed zopiclone, the morning shakes or the thoughts of not waking up unless asked the right question — or invited to add anything (apart from the timed cues).
  • Diagnose yourself, or use the word “alcoholic”.
  • Agree to see anyone or stop doing anything until the doctor has made the case.
2 · Examiner mark sheet — generic scheme plus the key facts for this case

Domain marks — with the key facts that earn a 4 at this station

Domain (GMC wording) · key facts for this case1234Score
1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skills
  • Gives specific, dated, first-hand observations (late Tuesday; slurred call and unsteady corridor yesterday) kindly and without labels; separates what reception reported
  • Asks how he is: sleep, eating, weight, mood, the bereavement, alcohol in stages (how much, when, mornings, before work), self-prescribing, his own GP
  • Red flags: thoughts of self-harm or suicide asked directly; drinking before or during work; morning shakes; driving; patients already affected (the referral, the complaint)
  • His ideas, concerns and expectations (grief, fear of the GMC and of losing the practice, wants silence) and impact — home, the practice, his children
☐☐☐☐/4
2 · Clinical management skills
  • Summary-and-check, then the formulation: a bereaved colleague with features of depression and harmful drinking affecting his work — needs independent assessment; not the FY1’s diagnosis to make
  • Signposts with substance: his own GP; NHS Practitioner Health (self-referral, confidential); BMA counselling line; the LMC; time off — and offers practical help to make the first call
  • Honest about limits: no secrecy; would rather he rang Dr Carver tonight — if not by an agreed time, the candidate rings her; duty covered; no sudden stopping; dated note
  • Safety-net: thoughts of ending his life → GP that day, 111, Samaritans or 999; no sudden stopping; no driving after drinking, including next morning; no duty unless a partner agrees — no call by an agreed time, candidate rings Dr Carver tonight · Follow-up: Dr Carver told tomorrow; check-in in a week
☐☐☐☐/4
3 · Interpersonal skills
  • Leads with concern for him as a person, not with the rules
  • Opens up the bereavement — Catherine, seven months — or picks up the photograph cue if it comes; lets him talk
  • Asks the hard questions — alcohol, suicide — plainly and without flinching or judging
  • Steady under “you’d finish me”: kind, unhurried, does not retreat from the plan
☐☐☐☐/4
Station total/12

Domain score (educational construct):

ScoreDescriptor
1Unsatisfactory (did not achieve safe FY2 standard)
2Borderline (just achieving minimum safe FY2 standard)
3Satisfactory (competent and safe FY2 standard)
4Good (exceeds FY2 standard)

This 1–4 domain score and its descriptors are an Acumen educational construct: the GMC publishes the three marking domains and the four-mark maximum, but not the descriptors its examiners use, and it does not publish station mark sheets. See Legal & Regulatory.

Marks are 1 to 4 in each domain; the generic descriptor for each mark is on the mark scheme page, and the structure of the eight minutes is on the 8-minute station page. The full standard for this case is in section 3 and the GMC feedback statements, with examples from this case, are in section 4.

3 · Expanded station-specific marking standard — what earns 4, 3, 2 and 1 here

The top row is the full picture of what a competent FY2 could do at this station, including the working diagnosis with its justified differentials, the safety-net and the follow-up; lower rows describe how performance falls away. It is a debriefing aid, not a checklist to recite: nobody says every line in eight minutes, and a 4 is a judgement that the essentials — the italic key facts on the mark sheet — were done well, in plain language and at the patient’s pace. Acumen training standard — the GMC does not publish station mark sheets.

MarkDomain 1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skillsDomain 2 · Clinical management skillsDomain 3 · Interpersonal skills
4
  • Opens honestly: has come because they are worried about him, as a colleague — says what the conversation is and is not (not a formal process, not a secret); describes what they saw and heard, dated and specific (late Tuesday; slurred, repetitive phone call and unsteady corridor yesterday), with no label and no diagnosis
  • Asks how he is and waits: sleep, appetite and weight, mood and enjoyment, the bereavement and how he has grieved, who he has told
  • Alcohol asked about in neutral stages — how much, how often, mornings, before or during work, withdrawal symptoms (the shakes), driving — rather than one leading question
  • Red flags asked directly: thoughts of self-harm or suicide, plans; drinking before surgery; patients already affected (the referral, the complaint letter); self-prescribing (the zopiclone) and whether he has a GP. Credit if offered, not required for a 4: asks, as a colleague, whether he has seen anyone about the unsteadiness or headaches
  • Ideas, concerns and expectations (grief, “it will pass”; fear of the GMC and of the practice collapsing; wants the FY1 to keep quiet) and impact on daily living (the house, eating, the practice meeting he avoids, his children; tomorrow’s duty session)
  • Summarises and checks whether he wants to add anything — which is when the lunchtime drink comes out, if it has not already
  • Working diagnosis (or formulation) with justified differentials: a bereaved senior colleague with symptoms of depression (sleep, weight loss, anhedonia, hopelessness) and harmful, possibly dependent, drinking (half a bottle of whisky, morning shakes, a drink before surgery) whose health is now affecting his work and his patients; less likely but not excluded — a medical cause for the slurring and unsteadiness (medication, neurological illness), which is one more reason he needs an independent assessment rather than the FY1’s opinion; the formulation is shared with him as concern, not as a verdict
  • Patient safety: says plainly that he should not do tomorrow’s duty session unless a partner has assessed him, and that cover must be arranged tonight (Dr Petrie, the manager, a locum) — and that if he has not made the call by an agreed time tonight, the candidate will ring Dr Carver themselves; that he should not drive after drinking, including the next morning; that the delayed referral and the complaint need to go to the partners
  • Signposts with substance: his own GP — a doctor should be registered with a GP outside the family and workplace, must not rely on their own assessment of their fitness, and should not prescribe for themselves; NHS Practitioner Health (free, confidential, self-referral, for health and care staff in England including doctors; mental health and addiction); the BMA’s 24-hour counselling and peer-support line, open to any doctor; time off — and offers to sit with him while he makes the first call
  • Honest about confidentiality: cannot keep this between them because patients may be at risk; will tell Dr Carver (or the practice manager) tomorrow and would much rather he told them himself tonight; explains that raising it properly, early, with help in place, is also the best protection for his registration — the GMC expects doctors to seek help and follow advice, and his colleagues are expected to be compassionate as well as to put patients first
  • Agrees what he will do tonight (ring Dr Carver by an agreed time; no duty tomorrow; taxi home and no driving in the morning; book his GP) and what the candidate will do tomorrow; a dated factual note. Credit if offered, not required for a 4: the LMC’s pastoral support and occupational health; that the partners may need advice from the LMC and their defence organisations, and that the responsible officer may need to be told
  • Safety-net: if his thoughts of not waking up become thoughts of ending his life, or he has a plan, he does not wait for an appointment — he rings his own GP the same day, NHS 111 and chooses the mental-health option, the Samaritans on 116 123, or 999 if he is in immediate danger — and the candidate tells him so in plain words; the candidate checks he feels safe to be on his own tonight and who he could call (his daughter), and suggests the remaining zopiclone is not kept to hand; he should not stop drinking suddenly on his own — his GP or Practitioner Health can advise how to do it safely, and shakes, sweating, confusion or a fit are reasons to call 111 or 999; he must not take zopiclone with alcohol; if he drinks before or during a working day again, or feels unsafe to see patients, he stops and tells a partner at once; he does not drive after drinking, including the next morning after a heavy evening; he must not do tomorrow’s duty session unless a partner has spoken to him and agreed it — if he has not rung Dr Carver (or Dr Petrie) by an agreed time this evening, the candidate rings Dr Carver on her mobile tonight so that cover is in place before 08:00, and tells him plainly that this is what will happen; and the candidate will speak to Dr Carver tomorrow morning whatever he decides tonight.
  • Follow-up: he agrees to ring Dr Carver (or the practice manager) tonight himself, by an agreed time, and to ask Dr Petrie or the manager to arrange cover for tomorrow’s duty session — if he has not, the candidate rings Dr Carver tonight; he books an appointment with his own GP this week and the candidate offers to sit with him while he rings NHS Practitioner Health; the candidate tells Dr Carver tomorrow morning what was observed and agreed, makes a dated factual note kept outside any patient record, and debriefs with their educational supervisor; the candidate checks in with him in a week — as a colleague, not as his doctor; the partners take advice from the LMC and their defence organisations about the complaint, the delayed referral, the self-prescribing and whether the responsible officer needs to be told.
  • Starts with him — “I’m worried about you” — before the practice or the rules
  • Specific and kind about what was seen; does not hide behind “people are saying”
  • Makes room for the bereavement — asks about Catherine, or picks up the photograph cue if it comes; tolerates silence and tears
  • Asks about alcohol and suicide plainly, in a tone that makes honesty possible
  • Holds the line under “you’d finish me” and “this is between us” without hardening: acknowledges the fear, repeats the plan, keeps offering to do it with him
  • Closes with what he has agreed to do tonight and what the candidate will do tomorrow — and thanks him for letting them in
3Observations given kindly and the main history taken — alcohol, mood, sleep, suicide risk; one of the self-prescribing, his own GP or the impact at home missing.Formulation shared gently, help signposted, tomorrow’s duty covered, honest that Dr Carver will be told; one of the self-prescribing, the driving, the safety-net for suicidal thoughts or the written note missing.Warm and honest; one hard question asked awkwardly, or the line about confidentiality delivered a little abruptly.
2Gets the observations out but the history is thin or leading (“you’re not drinking in the day, are you?”); suicide not asked about; the bereavement acknowledged in passing only.Signposts “you should see someone” without naming where; tomorrow’s duty session not raised; the plan for who is told left vague — but secrecy is declined.Either so tentative that he keeps the upper hand throughout, or formal and procedural; the photograph cue missed; he is left feeling managed rather than cared about.
1A monologue about what people have noticed; no questions about how he is; or so oblique that he never understands what is being said. Or unsafe: labels him (“you’re drinking”, “you were drunk”) as the opening; or never asks about alcohol, mood or suicide at all; or never mentions patients.Tells him what he must do with no offer of help; or offers sympathy and nothing else; no mention of patients, tomorrow or who else will know. Or unsafe: promises to keep it secret, or agrees to “see how it goes”; or agrees he can do the duty session tomorrow after admitting a drink before surgery yesterday; or tells him he is an alcoholic who will be reported to the GMC; or prescribes or offers to prescribe for him.Judgemental or embarrassed; lectures; or retreats as soon as he pushes back. Or unsafe: humiliates him (“you were drunk on the phone to a patient”), threatens him with the GMC, or laughs off his distress.
4 · GMC feedback statements — where underperformance was identified — with case-specific examples

A feedback statement marks where underperformance was identified in the consultation. With PLAB 2 results the GMC may attach any combination of the ten statements to a station — none, one or several. The right-hand column shows what each one looks like at this station. Record the statements that applied in the practice log.

GMC feedback statementUnderperformance it signals (generic)Case-specific examples
1 · ConsultationDisorganised or unstructured consultationNo shape to the conversation — observations, questions and advice tangled together; never says at the start what the meeting is, so he spends six minutes guessing; no summary before the plan.
2 · IssuesKey issues or priorities not recognisedTreats this as a disciplinary matter or, at the other extreme, as a pastoral chat; does not see that the tasks are to find out how he is, to get him help, and to keep patients safe tomorrow.
3 · TimePoor time managementSix minutes of gentle sympathy about Catherine; the bell goes before alcohol, suicide or tomorrow’s duty session have been mentioned.
4 · FindingsAbnormal findings or results, or their implications, not identifiedHears “Half a bottle, some nights”, “My hands shake in the mornings” and “I had a drink at lunchtime” and does not recognise dependence, withdrawal and a patient-safety risk; hears “I’d rather not wake up” and moves on.
5 · ExaminationPhysical examination or use of instruments not competentNo clinical examination at this station: what stands in for it is the quality of the questions — the candidate who asks “you’re not drinking in the day, are you?” gets “No” and learns nothing.
6 · DiagnosisWorking diagnosis or differential diagnoses not correct“You’re an alcoholic” or “it’s just grief, it’ll pass” — the one a verdict, the other a dismissal; no recognition that he needs an independent assessment, or that a physical cause has not been excluded.
7 · ManagementManagement plan not reflecting current best practiceSignposts nothing more specific than “talk to someone”; lets him do the duty session tomorrow; promises secrecy; nothing said about what he should do if the thoughts of not waking up get worse; no plan for who the candidate will tell, or when.
8 · RapportRapport and sensitivity to the patient’s feelings and concerns not shownLectures him about Good medical practice; or apologises so much for coming that he ends up comforting the candidate; or flinches when he becomes tearful and changes the subject.
9 · ListeningVerbal and non-verbal cues not used; poor active listeningMisses “I wondered if anyone had noticed”, the photograph and “This is between us, of course”; never summarises and invites him to add anything, so the lunchtime drink is never heard.
10 · LanguageLanguage or explanations not understandable; understanding not checked“Your presentation is consistent with alcohol dependence with a comorbid depressive episode, and GMP paragraph 79 obliges me to escalate” — to a grieving colleague who has just started to cry.
5 · Examiner points of fact and guidelines

Points of fact the examiner should have to hand

  1. Good medical practice (GMC, 2024; in effect 30 January 2024): paragraph 51 — be compassionate towards colleagues who have problems with their performance or health, but put patient safety first at all times; paragraph 63 — be willing to offer professional support to colleagues; paragraph 75 (third bullet) — if you have concerns that a colleague may not be fit to practise and may be putting patients at risk, ask for advice from a colleague, your defence body or the GMC, and if still concerned report it in line with your workplace policy and the GMC’s guidance on raising concerns. Raising and acting on concerns (2012, updated 2024), paragraph 10: you do not need proof — honest, reasonable belief raised through the right channels is enough; paragraph 13: raise it with a practice partner or, if it is about a partner, outside the practice; a doctor in training may raise it with a named person in their training organisation.
  2. A doctor’s duties about their own health (Good medical practice 2024): paragraph 77 — avoid seeking medical care from a family member or anyone you work closely with; if registered with a GP, it should be someone outside your family and your workplace; paragraph 78 — take care of your own health and wellbeing, recognise when you may not be fit for work, and seek independent professional advice rather than relying on your own assessment; paragraph 79 — if your judgement or performance could be affected by a condition or its treatment, you must consult a suitably qualified professional and follow their advice, and must not rely on your own assessment of the risk to patients; paragraph 97 — wherever possible avoid providing medical care to yourself, and follow the GMC’s guidance on prescribing. The self-prescribed zopiclone is a breach of that guidance which his own GP and the partners need to know about; it is not for the FY1 to police.
  3. Why the FY1 does not diagnose him: slurred speech, unsteadiness, tremor and weight loss have a differential — alcohol, depression, sedative medication, sleep deprivation, and neurological or metabolic illness — and only an independent clinical assessment can sort it out. The conversation’s job is to describe what was seen, to find out how he is, to get him to that assessment, and to make tomorrow safe.
  4. NHS Practitioner Health: a free, confidential NHS mental-health and addiction treatment service for health and care staff in England, including doctors, whose needs cannot easily be met locally because of their professional role; self-referral only — the practice cannot refer him, though colleagues can signpost; check the eligibility page before relying on it; phone 0300 0303 300; practitionerhealth.nhs.uk; a 24/7 crisis text line (Shout: text NHSPH to 85258). It offers psychiatric and addiction assessment, talking therapies, group work and support back to practice; it is not a crisis service.
  5. Other confidential help: the BMA’s counselling and peer-support line, 0330 123 1245 — free, confidential, 24 hours a day, open to all doctors and medical students whether or not BMA members; the Sick Doctors Trust (doctors, dentists and students concerned about their own or a colleague’s use of alcohol or drugs; helpline 0370 444 5163, 24 hours); the Doctors’ Support Network (peer support for doctors with mental health concerns); the local medical committee (LMC), most of which run a confidential pastoral or GP-support service; occupational health where the practice has access; the Samaritans, 116 123, free, 24 hours; NHS 111, mental-health option, for urgent help; 999 in immediate danger.
  6. Alcohol — what the figures mean: half a bottle of 40% whisky is about 14 units in one evening; the UK Chief Medical Officers’ low-risk guideline is no more than 14 units a week spread over three or more days. Morning tremor, nausea and sweating that settle later in the day suggest physical dependence (withdrawal), which makes sudden unsupervised stopping unsafe and means he needs medical assessment rather than a resolution to “cut down”. A drink before afternoon surgery is a patient-safety fact, whatever the diagnosis. (NICE CG115 covers assessment and management of harmful drinking and alcohol dependence; the AUDIT questionnaire is the recommended screening tool.)
  7. Depression and bereavement: persistent low mood, loss of pleasure, poor sleep, weight loss, hopelessness and passive thoughts of death seven months after a bereavement go beyond uncomplicated grief and need assessment (NICE NG222, depression in adults). Passive thoughts (“I’d rather not wake up”) without plan or intent are a lower level of risk than active ideation — but they must be asked about, recorded and safety-netted, and alcohol raises the risk.
  8. Confidentiality and honesty: the FY1 is not his doctor and owes him no duty of medical confidentiality — but owes him honesty: no promise of secrecy; a clear statement that the concern will go to a partner or the practice manager, and the offer to let him do it first. If he refuses and a patient-safety risk remains, the duty to patients overrides personal and professional loyalty (GMC, Raising concerns, paragraph 10). A GP partner is not an employee of the practice, but the practice is a CQC-registered provider with its own speaking-up policy, and every GP on the England performers list has a responsible officer in NHS England who deals with concerns about a doctor’s health as well as conduct — normally contacted by the partners after advice from the LMC and their defence organisations, not by the FY1.
  9. Driving: alcohol dependence and persistent misuse are DVLA-notifiable conditions (gov.uk, Assessing fitness to drive: drug or alcohol misuse and dependence); the immediate issue tonight is that he does not drive after drinking. The FY1 raises it as a question, not an instruction, and leaves the DVLA conversation to his own doctor.
  10. Documentation and the FY1’s own wellbeing: a dated, factual note of what was observed, discussed and agreed, kept confidentially outside any patient record (Good medical practice paragraphs 69–71); a debrief with the educational supervisor — a conversation like this is difficult for a first-year doctor and the foundation curriculum expects reflection on it; the FY1 may also use the BMA line or Practitioner Health themselves.

Where candidates lose marks at this station

  • “You’re not drinking in the day, are you?”
  • Never asking about suicide.
  • Promising it stays between you.
  • Letting him do the duty session tomorrow.
  • “Talk to someone” — with no name, number or offer to help.
  • Lecturing a grieving man about Good medical practice.

Guidelines for this station

6 · MLA content map tags for this case
MLA content mapThis station
Domain 1 · Areas of clinical practiceGeneral practice and primary healthcare · Mental health
Domain 3 · Clinical and professional capabilitiesLegal and ethical responsibilities · Capacity, consent and confidentiality · Team working · Managing risk · Reflective practice
Domain 5 · Patient presentationsSelf-neglect · Sleep problems · Substance misuse · Wellbeing checks
Domain 6 · ConditionsSubstance use disorder · Depression
Station familyAcute care, ethics and safeguarding — Professionalism — a conversation with a colleague you are worried about
7 · My marks and reflection — practice log form

Record your three domain marks, your station total, the GMC feedback statements that applied (where underperformance was identified), and what you will keep and change. The form is already labelled with this case and its web address; a copy of your entry is emailed to you, so your practice log builds up in your inbox and can be downloaded.

Record my marks and reflection for P2-22

Revision link for this case: mdacumen.com/plab-2-osce/case-22-a-quiet-word-with-a-colleague

Independence & scope. Independent, formative training material from MD Acumen Ltd. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or delivered on behalf of the General Medical Council. The GMC does not publish its station mark sheets: every mark scheme and descriptor on these pages is an Acumen training tool calibrated to the GMC's published marking domains, feedback statements and the MLA content map. Practice scores are not a prediction of examination performance. Clinical content reflects UK guidance at the date of editorial review — always check the current guideline. All patients are fictional. This course never provides, and will never ask you to share, real GMC exam content — full regulatory statement: Legal & Regulatory.