MD Acumen · PLAB 2 OSCE / CPSA course · free practice resources
Practice case P2-31 · Face-to-face · relative or carer

“She’s burning up and she’s got spots” — a mother with her two-year-old

A mother has brought her two-year-old daughter to the duty doctor as an emergency appointment: the child has had a fever since last night and now has a rash. The child is on her mother’s lap.

Reviewed and kept current

Station family: Acute care — a parent with a sick child · 8-minute station · 1 min 30 s reading · Last editorial review: 16 October 2026 · Next scheduled refresh: 11 April 2027.

Candidate instructions

Read this as you would outside the room

You have 1 minute 30 seconds to read, then 8 minutes. Candidates: everything below this section is folded away — leave it closed until you have finished the station.

Information
Your roleFoundation Year 2 doctor in a general practice, on the duty list. Your supervising GP is in the next room. The practice emergency drugs and oxygen are in the treatment room.
You are seeingMs Rachel Dunne, 31 — mother of Isla Dunne, aged 2 years 3 months, who is with her
Reception note“Isla hot since last night, now has spots, mum very worried. Fitted in as emergency.”
Isla’s recordsBorn at term; immunisations up to date for her age, including MenB. One previous attendance with a viral illness. No regular medication. No allergies. Weight at 2-year check 12.4 kg.
NoteThe role player describes Isla; examination findings and observations will be read out to you when you ask for them.

Your task

•
Take a focused history from Isla’s mother.
•
Ask for the examination findings and observations you need.
•
Decide what must happen now, and explain it to her.
Folded away

For the actor and the examiner

1 · Actor script — role player only

Candidates: do not open until you have consulted.

How to run this station

  • The role player is Isla’s mother and holds a doll or a rolled blanket on her lap as Isla. Isla herself does not speak. Everything the doctor would see or measure is read out from the findings at the end of this script, only when the doctor asks for it.
  • If the doctor asks you to do something practical — hold Isla, undress her, fetch your partner — do it and say so. If the doctor asks the receptionist or supervising GP for help, say “She’s on her way” or “They’re calling now” and continue.
  • Drugs and oxygen are ‘given’ when the doctor states the drug, dose and route aloud (or the oxygen flow); hold the doll still for an injection if asked. Time: if the doctor has not called 999 two minutes (station time) after the first observations were given, the examiner announces “ten minutes have passed” and gives the deterioration findings when asked. If 999 was called, the examiner announces “the ambulance crew has arrived” four minutes after the call, or at 7:00 if sooner. With no examiner, you say these announcements aloud, out of character, and then return to the role.

Persona and manner

  • Rachel Dunne, 31, a hairdresser. You live with your partner Tom and Isla. Your mum lives two streets away.
  • Frightened and trying to hold it together. You speak quickly, keep looking down at Isla, and stroke her hair. You are not angry — you just want someone to tell you what to do.

Opening line — say this verbatim

  • “She’s burning up, doctor, and now she’s got spots — look. She’s just not herself. I didn’t know whether to come here or go to A&E.”

Volunteer freely if given the space

  • She was fine at nursery yesterday. Last night she was hot and clingy and would not eat her tea; you gave paracetamol at about seven and again at two in the morning. She slept badly and was “moaning” in her sleep.
  • This morning she was sick once and has been floppy and quiet — “she normally never stops”. You noticed the spots on her tummy when you changed her about an hour ago; there seem to be more on her legs now.
  • You rang the surgery and reception fitted you in. You walked here — ten minutes.

Only if asked

  • The rash: tiny red-purple dots, some bigger ones on her shins that look like little bruises. If asked whether you have pressed a glass on them, or whether they fade when pressed: “I tried it with a tumbler — they didn’t go away. That’s why I panicked.” If not asked, do not mention the glass.
  • She has had one wet nappy since last night, less than usual. She has taken a few sips of juice. She was sick once this morning, no diarrhoea.
  • No cough, no runny nose, no pulling at her ears. No fits. She has not hit her head.
  • Her hands and feet felt cold to you this morning even though she was hot. She cried when you lifted her and “didn’t want her head moved” when you tried to put her coat on.
  • She was born at term; no problems. All her jabs are up to date — the nurse said so at her two-year check. No allergies. No regular medicines. Nobody else at home or at nursery has been unwell, as far as you know. No travel.
  • What you gave: paracetamol 120 mg (5 mL of the 120 mg in 5 mL suspension) at 7 pm and 2 am — nothing else. No ibuprofen. No antibiotics.
  • How she is right now, if asked to describe her rather than examine her: “She’s just lying on me. She looked at you when you came in but she hasn’t smiled. She’s hot but her feet are freezing.”

Impact on daily life — home and work (only if asked)

  • You were due at the salon at ten and have already rung in; your boss is “not happy”. Tom is a delivery driver and is out on his round — you have not been able to reach him.
  • You have no car here. Your mum could get to you in ten minutes if someone rang her.
  • You have not eaten or slept; you have been up with her since two.

Ideas, concerns and expectations

  • Idea: “I thought it was chickenpox — the girl next door had it last month. But chickenpox spots are blisters, aren’t they?”
  • Concern: the word you cannot say out loud is meningitis — a girl at your school died of it when you were eleven. If the doctor asks what you are most afraid of: “Is it… the meningitis one?”
  • Expectation: antibiotics — “just give her something” — and to be told whether to go to the hospital.

Cues to deliver, timed

  • Minute 1: look down — “She’s gone very quiet. Is that normal with a temperature?”
  • Minute 2, if the doctor has not yet asked to see or examine Isla or asked for observations: lift the blanket — “There are more spots than there were. Do you want to look?”
  • Minute 4, if 999 has not been mentioned: “Shall I just take her to A&E myself? I can get a taxi.”
  • If the doctor leaves the room to fetch help or the emergency drugs: say nothing; wait.

If the doctor summarises and asks whether you want to add anything

  • If the glass test has not come up: “I should have said — I pressed a glass on the spots like they say on the telly, and they didn’t go away. Does that matter?”
  • If it has: “Her feet were ice cold this morning, even though she was boiling. I thought that was odd.”
  • If both have come out: “Can I go with her in the ambulance?”

How to respond to the doctor

  • If the doctor tells you plainly that Isla is seriously unwell, that they are worried this could be a serious infection in the blood, that an ambulance is being called now, and that they are going to give her an antibiotic injection while you wait: you cry, then nod — “Do it. Whatever she needs.” Hold her still for the injection if asked.
  • If the doctor says “it’s probably viral” or “let’s see how she goes” or offers an appointment later: “But she’s not right. Look at her.” — and, if that is still the plan: “I’m taking her to A&E myself.”
  • If the doctor suggests you take her to hospital by car or taxi rather than calling 999: ask “Is that quick enough? What if she gets worse on the way?”
  • If the doctor asks whether they can give an injection into her thigh and explains why: “Will it hurt her? … Do it.”
  • If jargon is used (“meningococcal septicaemia”, “non-blanching purpura”, “sepsis six”): “What does that mean? Is she going to be all right?”
  • If asked whether you would like your mum or Tom called: “Mum. Please. She’s ten minutes away.” Give the number.
  • If the doctor says nothing about what happens next or what the hospital will do: “What will they do to her?”

Do not

  • Volunteer the glass test or the cold hands and feet unless asked — or until invited to add anything (apart from the timed cues).
  • Use the words “meningitis” or “septicaemia” yourself, except the single question about “the meningitis one” if the doctor asks what you most fear.
  • Describe Isla as better than the findings say. She does not perk up, feed or smile during the station.

Findings to give the candidate — only if asked for

Give each finding only when the candidate asks to examine Isla or asks for that observation. Do not offer findings otherwise. (Where a separate examiner is present, the examiner reads them.)

General: Isla is lying limply against her mother, eyes open but not interested in the room; she does not smile at the doctor and cries weakly when moved, then settles. Hands and feet cold; skin pale and mottled over the legs. Observations: temperature 39.6 °C; heart rate 168; respiratory rate 34, no recession or grunting; capillary refill 4 seconds centrally; SpO₂ 96% on air. Weight today 12.4 kg. Rash: scattered pinpoint red-purple spots over the trunk and both legs, several now 3–4 mm and bruise-like on the shins; they do not fade when pressed with a glass; two petechiae inside the left lower eyelid. Neck: she resists having her head moved and cries; no bulging fontanelle (closed). No focal neurology; moves all limbs. Chest clear; abdomen soft; ears and throat red but unremarkable. Blood glucose 5.1 mmol/L if checked. If 999 has not been called two minutes (station time) after the first observations — announce “ten minutes have passed” — then give, when asked: heart rate 176, capillary refill 5 seconds, more spots on the arms, and she is harder to rouse. Ambulance: if 999 was called, the examiner announces “the ambulance crew has arrived” four minutes (station time) after the call, or at 7:00 if sooner; with no examiner, the role player says the announcements aloud, out of character.

2 · Examiner mark sheet — generic scheme plus the key facts for this case

Domain marks — with the key facts that earn a 4 at this station

Domain (GMC wording) · key facts for this case1234Score
1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skills
  • Recognises a seriously ill child in the first minute from what is in front of them — floppy, not smiling, cold mottled extremities — and looks at the rash early
  • Rash history: spread, size, whether it fades under pressure (glass test); fever course, antipyretics given; feeding, wet nappies, vomiting, drowsiness, neck pain; immunisations
  • Asks for the observations and findings: temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, capillary refill, saturations, conscious level; presses the rash; checks conjunctivae and neck
  • Red flags named: non-blanching rash, heart rate 168, capillary refill 4 s, lethargy, cold peripheries; ICE (chickenpox; fears meningitis; wants antibiotics); impact — alone, no transport
☐☐☐☐/4
2 · Clinical management skills
  • Summary and check, then the working diagnosis said aloud: suspected meningococcal disease (septicaemia ± meningitis), a high-risk child — why not chickenpox, a viral exanthem, ITP or simple fever
  • 999 ambulance now with a pre-alert to the paediatric unit; supervising GP called into the room; oxygen and monitoring; does not delay transfer
  • Benzylpenicillin 600 mg IM/IV (1–9 years) or ceftriaxone 1 g IM (1–4 years) before transfer unless it delays it; allergy checked; dose and time recorded; UKHSA notified
  • Safety-net: while waiting — a fit, not rousable, breathing changes or rash spreading → tell the doctor at once; after discharge new fever, rash, drowsiness or not drinking → 999 · Follow-up: paediatric team today; UKHSA notified within 24 h; GP review in the first week
☐☐☐☐/4
3 · Interpersonal skills
  • Calm, direct and honest with a frightened mother — says the serious possibility plainly, without the jargon
  • Keeps explaining what is happening while acting — who is coming, why the injection, what the hospital will do
  • Answers “is it the meningitis one?” truthfully: it might be, that is why we are moving fast; no false promises about the outcome
  • Practical kindness: rings her mother, asks about Tom, makes sure she can travel in the ambulance
☐☐☐☐/4
Station total/12

Domain score (educational construct):

ScoreDescriptor
1Unsatisfactory (did not achieve safe FY2 standard)
2Borderline (just achieving minimum safe FY2 standard)
3Satisfactory (competent and safe FY2 standard)
4Good (exceeds FY2 standard)

This 1–4 domain score and its descriptors are an Acumen educational construct: the GMC publishes the three marking domains and the four-mark maximum, but not the descriptors its examiners use, and it does not publish station mark sheets. See Legal & Regulatory.

Marks are 1 to 4 in each domain; the generic descriptor for each mark is on the mark scheme page, and the structure of the eight minutes is on the 8-minute station page. The full standard for this case is in section 3 and the GMC feedback statements, with examples from this case, are in section 4. The examination findings that the role player gives — only if the candidate asks for them — are at the end of section 1.

3 · Expanded station-specific marking standard — what earns 4, 3, 2 and 1 here

The top row is the full picture of what a competent FY2 could do at this station, including the working diagnosis with its justified differentials, the safety-net and the follow-up; lower rows describe how performance falls away. It is a debriefing aid, not a checklist to recite: nobody says every line in eight minutes, and a 4 is a judgement that the essentials — the italic key facts on the mark sheet — were done well, in plain language and at the patient’s pace. Acumen training standard — the GMC does not publish station mark sheets.

MarkDomain 1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skillsDomain 2 · Clinical management skillsDomain 3 · Interpersonal skills
4
  • Looks before asking — notices within the first minute that this is a limp, pale, cold-handed child who is not smiling, and says so; asks to see the rash early rather than at the end of a history
  • Fever and rash history: when it started, antipyretics and doses, how the rash looked at first and how it has changed, whether it fades under pressure — asks about the glass test or does it
  • Feeding and drinking, wet nappies, vomiting, drowsiness, irritability, dislike of being handled or of the neck being moved, any fits; cough, ears, diarrhoea to weigh alternative sources; contacts; immunisations (MenB), allergies
  • Asks for the full set of observations and findings — temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, work of breathing, capillary refill, saturations, conscious level — and asks for the rash to be pressed and for petechiae in the conjunctivae and the neck to be checked
  • Red flags named aloud against the age-based criteria: non-blanching petechial–purpuric rash, heart rate 168 (high risk over 150 at 1–2 years), capillary refill 4 seconds, lethargy with weak cry, cold mottled peripheries, reduced urine output
  • ICE: she thinks chickenpox, fears meningitis, expects antibiotics; impact on daily living: alone with no transport, partner unreachable, work and her own exhaustion
  • Keeps the history to what changes management — does not take a full birth and developmental history while the child is this unwell
  • Summarises to the mother in two sentences and checks whether she wants to add anything — which is when the glass test or the cold feet come out if they have not already (this may follow the 999 call and the antibiotic; urgent action is never held back for the summary)
  • Working diagnosis with justified differentials: suspected meningococcal disease — a febrile toddler with a spreading non-blanching petechial–purpuric rash, lethargy, cold mottled peripheries, tachycardia and prolonged capillary refill; possible meningitis too (resists neck movement). Chickenpox gives blanching papules and vesicles in a child who is usually well; a viral exanthem blanches; ITP gives petechiae in a well child without fever or shock; a simple febrile illness does not produce cold peripheries, capillary refill of 4 seconds and a heart rate of 168. Says the diagnosis cannot be made or excluded by the rash alone — the illness is what matters
  • Acts in the right order and without delay: asks the supervising GP to come now; a 999 ambulance is called from the room (not a taxi, not the mother’s car); the receiving paediatric unit is pre-alerted by telephone that a child with suspected meningococcal disease is coming and needs a senior clinician; oxygen via the practice supply and observations repeated while waiting
  • Antibiotic before transfer, because this is strongly suspected meningococcal disease and it will not delay the ambulance: benzylpenicillin 600 mg IM or IV for a child aged 1–9 years (300 mg under 1 year; 1.2 g from 10 years), or ceftriaxone 1 g by deep IM injection for a child aged 1–4 years — after checking for severe allergy to either; the drug, dose, route and time are written down and handed over. (An FY2 who asks the supervising GP to confirm the dose from the BNF for Children loses nothing)
  • Does not give an antipyretic, a further paracetamol or an oral antibiotic as the “treatment”; does not do a lumbar puncture, bloods or anything else that delays the transfer; glucose checked if a meter is to hand
  • Explains to the mother, while doing all this, what is suspected and why, what the injection is for, and what the hospital will do — fluids, intravenous antibiotics, blood tests — and that a parent travels with her
  • Records everything contemporaneously and arranges the follow-up above. Credit if offered, not required for a 4: the health protection team is notified (telephone within 24 hours, online within 3 days, without waiting for a laboratory result); close contacts will be offered prophylaxis by the hospital or UKHSA; that the vaccines she has had cover some but not all meningococcal groups, so being immunised does not rule this out
  • Safety-net: for the minutes before the ambulance arrives the mother is told what to shout for — Isla has a fit, becomes impossible to rouse, her breathing changes or the rash spreads in front of her eyes — and the doctor stays with them, with oxygen on and observations repeated; after discharge from hospital the mother is told that a return of fever, a new rash, drowsiness, refusal to drink or fewer wet nappies means 999 or the emergency department, not a wait for a GP appointment; the hospital will arrange antibiotic prophylaxis for close household contacts and the practice checks it has happened.
  • Follow-up: the paediatric team assesses her today on arrival — the practice pre-alerts them by telephone with the time and dose of any antibiotic given; the GP notifies the UKHSA health protection team of suspected meningococcal disease by telephone within 24 hours (confirmed online within 3 days) without waiting for laboratory confirmation; the practice telephones the family within 48 hours of discharge and books a GP review in the first week, including hearing and development follow-up arranged by the hospital if meningitis is confirmed; the consultation, observations, drug, dose, route and time are recorded contemporaneously.
  • Takes the mother seriously from the first sentence — does not minimise the rash or the “not herself”
  • Says the serious possibility plainly and early: “I am worried this could be a serious infection in Isla’s blood, so we are going to move fast”
  • Answers “is it the meningitis one?” honestly — it may be, this is how we treat it until we know — and does not promise that she will be fine
  • Keeps talking while acting: names who is coming and why, explains the injection before giving it, tells her she travels in the ambulance
  • Plain words throughout — no “sepsis”, “purpura”, “meningococcal” without an immediate explanation; checks what she has understood
  • Practical kindness: offers to ring her mother and leave a message for Tom; asks the receptionist to look after her bag and coat
3Rash, observations and the red flags obtained and named; one of the glass test, the immunisation status, the mother’s fear or the practical situation missing.Meningococcal disease suspected and named, 999 called and the antibiotic given before transfer; one of the pre-alert, the supervising GP, the allergy check, the dose written down or the notification missing.Honest, kind and clear; one of the explanation of the injection, the question about meningitis or the practical help a little rushed.
2Takes a routine febrile-child history in order; examines or asks for observations only after the minute-2 cue; does not press the rash or ask whether it fades.Recognises that she needs hospital but sends her by taxi or car; or calls 999 and gives no antibiotic although it would not delay transfer; or gives the antibiotic with the wrong dose, hesitantly corrected; explanation to the mother thin.Competent but silent — does the right things without telling her what is happening; or over-reassures (“she’ll be fine”) to calm her.
1Accepts “a temperature and a rash” without looking at the child; few observations requested; no assessment of how ill she is. Or unsafe: does not ask to see the rash or for any observations; or records heart rate 168, capillary refill 4 seconds and a non-blanching rash and does not call them abnormal.“Probably viral — paracetamol and come back if worse”; or an oral antibiotic and a review tomorrow; no safety-net. Or unsafe: reassures the mother and sends the child home; delays the ambulance to take blood or perform an examination of every system; or gives the antibiotic by mouth, or in a dose ten times too high or low, without correction.Brusque, dismissive of her fear, or so frightening that she cannot take anything in; no acknowledgement that she did the right thing by coming. Or unsafe: tells her she is overreacting; or blames her for the delay or the paracetamol; or leaves her alone with a deteriorating child and no explanation.
4 · GMC feedback statements — where underperformance was identified — with case-specific examples

A feedback statement marks where underperformance was identified in the consultation. With PLAB 2 results the GMC may attach any combination of the ten statements to a station — none, one or several. The right-hand column shows what each one looks like at this station. Record the statements that applied in the practice log.

GMC feedback statementUnderperformance it signals (generic)Case-specific examples
1 · ConsultationDisorganised or unstructured consultationTakes a full systematic history for five minutes with the child unseen on her mother’s lap; no summary; the ambulance is called in the last minute.
2 · IssuesKey issues or priorities not recognisedTreats it as a routine “fever and rash” — reassures that it is probably viral or chickenpox — and does not recognise a child at high risk of sepsis who needs emergency treatment now.
3 · TimePoor time managementSpends the time on the birth history, nursery and the family’s travel; the examination, the antibiotic and the explanation are never reached.
4 · FindingsAbnormal findings or results, or their implications, not identifiedIs told heart rate 168, capillary refill 4 seconds, cold mottled legs and spots that do not fade with a glass — and does not say that any of these is abnormal, or does not connect them.
5 · ExaminationPhysical examination or use of instruments not competentNever asks to look at Isla or presses the rash; does not ask for observations; or asks for them and carries on with the history as if nothing had been said.
6 · DiagnosisWorking diagnosis or differential diagnoses not correct“It could be a virus” — the word meningococcal is never said; cannot say why this is not chickenpox, a viral rash or ITP; or names the diagnosis but stops there.
7 · ManagementManagement plan not reflecting current best practiceSends the child by taxi — “Shall I just take her to A&E myself?” accepted; or 999 called but no antibiotic although it would not delay transfer; dose not stated or recorded; no pre-alert; no notification; nothing said to the mother about what to shout for while they wait, or what to do after discharge; no follow-up.
8 · RapportRapport and sensitivity to the patient’s feelings and concerns not shownTalks to the examiner rather than to the mother; delivers “she has septicaemia” with no warmth; or over-reassures — “she’ll be fine, don’t worry”.
9 · ListeningVerbal and non-verbal cues not used; poor active listeningMisses “she’s gone very quiet” and “there are more spots than there were”; never invites her to add anything, so the glass test and the ice-cold feet are never heard.
10 · LanguageLanguage or explanations not understandable; understanding not checked“Non-blanching purpura with prolonged CRT — I’m going to give IM benpen and pre-alert paeds for a sepsis screen” — said to the mother with no translation.
5 · Examiner points of fact and guidelines

Points of fact the examiner should have to hand

  1. NICE NG240 (Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management; published 19 March 2024): strongly suspect meningococcal disease in anyone with a haemorrhagic non-blanching rash with lesions larger than 2 mm (purpura), a rapidly progressive or spreading non-blanching petechial or purpuric rash, or any symptoms or signs of bacterial meningitis combined with a non-blanching petechial or purpuric rash (rec 1.1.9). Do not rule out meningococcal disease because there is no rash (1.1.10). Check the whole body including nappy areas and look for petechiae in the conjunctivae; rashes can be hard to see on brown, black or tanned skin (1.1.12).
  2. Transfer and pre-hospital antibiotics (NG240 1.2.1–1.2.6): transfer to hospital as an emergency and tell the hospital that the child needs assessment by a senior clinical decision maker; do not delay transfer to give antibiotics; for strongly suspected meningococcal disease give intravenous or intramuscular ceftriaxone or benzylpenicillin as soon as possible outside hospital unless this will delay transfer (1.2.5); for strongly suspected bacterial meningitis give them only if there is likely to be a clinically significant delay in transfer (1.2.4); do not give either outside hospital if there is a severe allergy to it (1.2.6).
  3. Doses (BNF for Children, suspected meningococcal disease, pre-hospital treatment): benzylpenicillin sodium by IV or IM injection — under 1 year 300 mg; 1–9 years 600 mg; 10–17 years 1.2 g — single dose, given before urgent transfer unless this delays it. Ceftriaxone by deep IM injection — 1 month 250 mg; 2–11 months 500 mg; 1–4 years 1 g; 5–8 years 1.5 g; 9–11 years 2 g; 12–17 years 2 g (IV or IM) — and the actual dose given is communicated to the receiving hospital, which obtains the weight and gives any remainder. Isla, aged 2 and 12 kg, receives benzylpenicillin 600 mg or ceftriaxone 1 g. (Adult pre-hospital doses are in the adult BNF — confirm there before quoting them.)
  4. Risk of severe illness or death from sepsis (NICE NG254, Suspected sepsis in under 16s, published 19 November 2025 — which with NG253 and NG255 replaced NG51): high-risk criteria in a child under 5 include no response to social cues, appearing ill to a healthcare professional, not waking or not staying awake, a weak high-pitched or continuous cry, grunting or apnoea, saturations below 90%, heart rate 150 or more at 1–2 years (160 or more under 1 year; 140 or more at 3–4 years), bradycardia, a mottled or ashen appearance, cyanosis, and a non-blanching petechial or purpuric rash; capillary refill of 3 seconds or more and reduced urine output are moderate-to-high-risk criteria. A child meeting any high-risk criterion is referred for emergency care, usually by 999 ambulance, with secondary care pre-alerted (recs 1.5.2, 1.6.1–1.6.2). Where transfer routinely takes over an hour, GPs should have the means to give antibiotics (1.6.3).
  5. NICE NG143 (Fever in under 5s; last updated 26 November 2021) remains current for the traffic-light assessment: a non-blanching rash, bulging fontanelle, neck stiffness, status epilepticus, focal neurology, a temperature of 38 °C or more under 3 months, weak or high-pitched cry, not waking, mottled or ashen skin and tachycardia above the age thresholds are red features. NG143 (APLS criteria) defines tachycardia at 2–5 years as above 140 (amber); in NG254 the 1-to-2-years band makes 150 or more a high-risk criterion — Isla’s 168 exceeds both, and the sepsis guideline is the one to act on.
  6. The glass (tumbler) test: a rash that does not fade when a clear glass is pressed firmly on it is a non-blanching rash and an emergency; a rash that fades does not exclude meningococcal disease, which often starts with no rash or a blanching one. On darker skin check the palms, soles, inside the lower eyelids and the roof of the mouth (Meningitis Research Foundation; NG240 1.1.12). The cardinal early signs of septicaemia are cold hands and feet, leg pain, pale or mottled skin and a child who is “not themselves” — not the rash.
  7. Immunisation does not exclude meningococcal disease. The UK routine schedule gives MenB in infancy and MenACWY at 14 years, so a two-year-old has had MenB only (GOV.UK complete routine immunisation schedule, 2026); no vaccine covers every strain, effectiveness is incomplete, and other organisms (pneumococcus, Haemophilus influenzae type b, group A streptococcus) also cause purpuric sepsis. Say “her jabs make this less likely, not impossible”.
  8. Notification: acute meningitis and meningococcal septicaemia are notifiable diseases in England (Health Protection (Notification) Regulations 2010, as amended in 2025). The registered medical practitioner who suspects the disease notifies the local UKHSA health protection team by telephone within 24 hours and completes the online notification within 3 days — without waiting for laboratory confirmation. The health protection team arranges prophylaxis for close contacts; the hospital usually initiates this, and the practice checks it has happened.
  9. What the hospital does (NG240 sections 1.5–1.8, in outline): blood cultures and meningococcal PCR, blood gas, lactate, glucose and clotting; intravenous ceftriaxone; fluid resuscitation and escalation to paediatric critical care as needed; lumbar puncture only when safe and without delaying antibiotics; corticosteroids are considered for bacterial meningitis, not for meningococcal septicaemia alone. Before and after discharge (sections 1.12–1.13) the family is told what to expect and survivors are followed up for hearing loss, developmental, orthopaedic and psychological sequelae — audiological assessment within 4 weeks of being well enough (NG240 1.12.7) and a paediatrician review 4–6 weeks after discharge (1.13.1).
  10. Parental concern is a sign. NG254 lists “parent or carer concern that the child is behaving differently from usual” as a moderate-to-high-risk criterion in under 5s, and NG240 asks clinicians to take family reports of symptoms into account (1.1.2). The mother who says “she’s just not herself” is giving you a finding.

Where candidates lose marks at this station

  • Five minutes of history with the child unseen.
  • “It’s probably viral — paracetamol and see how she goes.”
  • Sending a child with a non-blanching rash to hospital by taxi.
  • Calling 999 and then standing there — no antibiotic although it would not delay the ambulance.
  • “Benpen” with no dose, route or time written down or handed over.
  • Over-reassuring — “she’ll be absolutely fine”.

Guidelines for this station

6 · MLA content map tags for this case
MLA content mapThis station
Domain 1 · Areas of clinical practiceChild health · Infection · Acute and emergency
Domain 3 · Clinical and professional capabilitiesEmergency and acute management plans · History, examination and differential diagnosis · Managing risk · Communication with patients, relatives and carers · Using guidelines and evidence
Domain 5 · Patient presentationsThe sick child · Fever · Purpuric/ petechial rash · Vomiting
Domain 6 · ConditionsMeningitis · Sepsis (including neutropenic sepsis)
Station familyAcute care, ethics and safeguarding — Acute care — a parent with a sick child
7 · My marks and reflection — practice log form

Record your three domain marks, your station total, the GMC feedback statements that applied (where underperformance was identified), and what you will keep and change. The form is already labelled with this case and its web address; a copy of your entry is emailed to you, so your practice log builds up in your inbox and can be downloaded.

Record my marks and reflection for P2-31

Revision link for this case: mdacumen.com/plab-2-osce/case-31-hot-child-with-a-rash

Independence & scope. Independent, formative training material from MD Acumen Ltd. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or delivered on behalf of the General Medical Council. The GMC does not publish its station mark sheets: every mark scheme and descriptor on these pages is an Acumen training tool calibrated to the GMC's published marking domains, feedback statements and the MLA content map. Practice scores are not a prediction of examination performance. Clinical content reflects UK guidance at the date of editorial review — always check the current guideline. All patients are fictional. This course never provides, and will never ask you to share, real GMC exam content — full regulatory statement: Legal & Regulatory.