“Please don’t tell my mum” — a 15-year-old asks for emergency contraception
A 15-year-old has come to the practice on her own after school and asked reception for “the morning-after pill”. She has asked that her mother is not told.
Reviewed and kept current
Station family: Explanation and counselling — a young person’s request · 8-minute station · 1 min 30 s reading · Last editorial review: 16 October 2026 · Next scheduled refresh: 11 April 2027.
Read this as you would outside the room
You have 1 minute 30 seconds to read, then 8 minutes. Candidates: everything below this section is folded away — leave it closed until you have finished the station.
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Your role | Foundation Year 2 doctor in a general practice. Your supervising GP, who is the practice safeguarding lead, is available by telephone. The local sexual health clinic offers same-day and next-day appointments and fits coils. |
| Patient | Mia Kerrigan, aged 15 years 4 months, Year 11 at the local secondary school. She is alone. |
| Reception note | “Asked for the morning-after pill. Doesn’t want her mum to know. Came straight from school.” |
| Records | Mild asthma — salbutamol inhaler as needed, no steroid tablets in the last year. No other medication. No allergies. Last seen 18 months ago with a sore throat, with her mother. Weight at that visit 56 kg, height 1.63 m. Nothing recorded about contraception. No safeguarding alerts. |
Your task
For the actor and the examiner
1 · Actor script — role player only
Candidates: do not open until you have consulted.
Persona and manner
- Mia Kerrigan, 15, in Year 11; you want to do A-levels and become a vet nurse. You live with your mum Lisa, a nurse who works shifts, and your younger brother. Your parents are separated; you see your dad at weekends.
- Nervous, arms folded, speaking quietly and quickly; you glance at the door. You are articulate and you have looked things up online. You are not tearful unless the doctor is unkind.
Opening line — say this verbatim
- “I need the morning-after pill. And please don’t tell my mum — she’ll go mad. Can you just give it to me?”
Volunteer freely if given the space
- Last night, about ten o’clock — so about nineteen hours ago — you had sex with your boyfriend Ethan and the condom split. You realised straight away.
- You looked it up and know there is a pill you can take, and that it is better sooner. You could not get out of school until half past three.
- You are not on any contraception. You have never been pregnant.
Only if asked
- Ethan: he is 17, in the sixth form at your school, and you have been together since March — about seven months. He is your first boyfriend. Your friends know him. He did not pressure you; it was your decision as much as his. He knows you are here and offered to come; you said no.
- You have had sex with him a few times since the summer, always with a condom. Keep back the earlier episode this cycle unless asked directly whether there has been any other sex since your last period, or whether a condom has ever slipped or come off — otherwise it comes out only when you are invited to add anything.
- Periods: regular, every 28 days, last one started ten days ago — “so I think I’m about in the middle, which is the worst time, isn’t it?”
- Health: asthma, blue inhaler only — maybe twice a month; no steroid tablets for years. No other medicines, no herbal remedies; no epilepsy tablets. No allergies. You are not sick easily. Weight “about nine stone”.
- Nobody has ever made you do anything you did not want to do. Nobody older has been involved. Nobody gives you money, gifts, alcohol or vapes for anything. You are not in care and never have been; you have never gone missing. You feel safe at home and at school. Your mum would be upset and disappointed — “she thinks I’m still twelve” — not violent.
- You have not told anyone except your best friend. You have not been tested for infections; neither has Ethan, as far as you know — “he said he’s only been with one other girl”.
- You would like to go on “proper” contraception — you have heard of the pill and the implant — but you do not want anything that means your mum finds out.
- If asked why you did not go to a pharmacy: you were worried about being seen in the chemist near school and about the cost.
Impact on daily life — home and school (only if asked)
- You did not sleep last night and could not concentrate in school; you have mocks in three weeks.
- You are terrified of being pregnant at fifteen — “that would be the end of everything”.
- You are frightened that if your mum finds out she will stop you seeing Ethan.
Ideas, concerns and expectations
- Idea: that the pill “always works” if you take it today, and that the doctor will have to tell your mum because you are under sixteen.
- Concerns: being pregnant; your mum finding out; whether this will be on your record for her to see; whether the doctor will judge you.
- Expectation: to walk out with the pill in the next ten minutes and no fuss.
Cues to deliver, timed
- Minute 2: “Will this go on my record? Mum works at the hospital — can she see it?”
- Minute 4, if the doctor has not asked about Ethan at all: “It’s not like he’s some older bloke — he’s in Year 13. We’re fine.”
- Minute 5, if a coil has not been mentioned by then: “My friend said there’s something that works better than the pill. Is that true?”
If the doctor summarises and asks whether you want to add anything
- If the earlier episode has not come out: a pause — “There was one other time. Last Saturday — six days ago. The condom didn’t split but it… came off a bit when he pulled out. I didn’t think it counted. Does it?”
- If it has: “If I go on the pill, will it be on my record where Mum can see it?”
How to respond to the doctor
- If the doctor says in a sentence or two that what you say stays in the practice unless someone is at risk of serious harm, and asks Ethan’s age and about home: you relax and answer. “OK. That’s fair.”
- If the doctor says “I can’t tell anyone, I promise, whatever you say”: “Really? Even if…?” — then move on. (Do not test the promise further.)
- If the doctor says they must tell your mum, or must have her permission: “Then I’m going to the chemist” — stand up to leave. Sit down again only if the doctor corrects themselves and explains the actual position.
- If the doctor explains that the coil is the most effective option and works for the longest, and that you can be seen at the clinic today or tomorrow, but that the tablet is a good option if you do not want that: you think about it — “I don’t think I want something put inside me today… but could I come back and have it as my proper contraception?”
- If offered the tablet with a clear explanation of when to take it, what to do if you are sick, that it does not protect you for the rest of the month, and when to do a pregnancy test: you nod and repeat it back if asked.
- If the doctor suggests starting ongoing contraception and explains that it can be arranged confidentially and that nothing is sent home: relieved — “Can I do that? Properly?”
- If the doctor asks whether you would be willing to tell your mum, or someone else at home, and explains why it might help: “Maybe my auntie. Not Mum. Not yet.”
- If the doctor offers testing for infections and explains it is a swab you take yourself: “Oh. OK. Do I have to?” — agree if the doctor says it is your choice and explains why it is offered.
- If the doctor says “you’re too young”, “you shouldn’t be doing this” or “what were you thinking”: go quiet, give one-word answers, and say you want to go.
- If the doctor uses jargon (“UPA”, “Fraser competent”, “LARC”, “NAATs”): “Sorry — what?”
Do not
- Volunteer the earlier episode six days ago unless asked directly about other sex since your period or a condom slipping — or until invited to add anything (apart from the timed cues).
- Invent any pressure, violence, an older partner, gifts, alcohol, drugs, going missing, care involvement or online exploitation. If asked, the answers are no — this is a consensual relationship with a boy two years older at the same school.
- Agree to your mum being told today.
2 · Examiner mark sheet — generic scheme plus the key facts for this case
Domain marks — with the key facts that earn a 4 at this station
| Domain (GMC wording) · key facts for this case | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skills
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | /4 |
2 · Clinical management skills
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | /4 |
3 · Interpersonal skills
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | /4 |
| Station total | /12 |
Domain score (educational construct):
| Score | Descriptor |
|---|---|
| 1 | Unsatisfactory (did not achieve safe FY2 standard) |
| 2 | Borderline (just achieving minimum safe FY2 standard) |
| 3 | Satisfactory (competent and safe FY2 standard) |
| 4 | Good (exceeds FY2 standard) |
This 1–4 domain score and its descriptors are an Acumen educational construct: the GMC publishes the three marking domains and the four-mark maximum, but not the descriptors its examiners use, and it does not publish station mark sheets. See Legal & Regulatory.
Marks are 1 to 4 in each domain; the generic descriptor for each mark is on the mark scheme page, and the structure of the eight minutes is on the 8-minute station page. The full standard for this case is in section 3 and the GMC feedback statements, with examples from this case, are in section 4.
3 · Expanded station-specific marking standard — what earns 4, 3, 2 and 1 here
The top row is the full picture of what a competent FY2 could do at this station, including the working diagnosis with its justified differentials, the safety-net and the follow-up; lower rows describe how performance falls away. It is a debriefing aid, not a checklist to recite: nobody says every line in eight minutes, and a 4 is a judgement that the essentials — the italic key facts on the mark sheet — were done well, in plain language and at the patient’s pace. Acumen training standard — the GMC does not publish station mark sheets.
| Mark | Domain 1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skills | Domain 2 · Clinical management skills | Domain 3 · Interpersonal skills |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 |
|
|
|
| 3 | Timing, cycle, competence and the safeguarding questions covered; one of the medical screen, the earlier episode, the STI history or the impact missing. | Right option offered with correct timing and instructions, competence and confidentiality handled correctly; one of the IUD, the ongoing contraception, the pregnancy test or the documentation missing. | Kind and clear; confidentiality explained a little mechanically, or the invitation to involve an adult made only once. |
| 2 | Takes the request at face value — asks when and little else; safeguarding reduced to “is he your boyfriend?”; competence assumed; cycle not worked out. | Prescribes levonorgestrel without mentioning ulipristal or the IUD; or gives the tablet but no instructions on vomiting, the rest of the cycle or a pregnancy test; or handles confidentiality vaguely; follow-up open-ended. | Polite but procedural; safeguarding questions fired as a checklist with no explanation; the “record” fear not answered. |
| 1 | Minimal history; no safeguarding questions; or interrogates her about Ethan from the first minute. Or unsafe: no assessment of competence or safety at all before prescribing; or refuses to take a history because she is under 16 and alone. | Declines to treat today and offers a later appointment or a pharmacy visit instead; or hands over a prescription in two minutes with no assessment, no plan for ongoing contraception and no safety-net. Or unsafe: insists on telephoning her mother or demands parental consent as a condition; or prescribes without any safeguarding or competence assessment; or tells her the tablet makes her safe for the rest of the month. | Judgemental, cold or lecturing; she gives one-word answers and asks to leave. Or unsafe: threatens to tell her mother, shames her, or promises absolute secrecy — “I can’t tell anyone, whatever you say”. |
4 · GMC feedback statements — where underperformance was identified — with case-specific examples
A feedback statement marks where underperformance was identified in the consultation. With PLAB 2 results the GMC may attach any combination of the ten statements to a station — none, one or several. The right-hand column shows what each one looks like at this station. Record the statements that applied in the practice log.
| GMC feedback statement | Underperformance it signals (generic) | Case-specific examples |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Consultation | Disorganised or unstructured consultation | Jumps between the pill, the boyfriend and the mother with no structure; prescribes before the timing or the cycle is known; no summary. |
| 2 · Issues | Key issues or priorities not recognised | Treats it as a prescription-only transaction — or as a safeguarding interrogation — and does not recognise that the station is competence, confidentiality and the best emergency-contraception choice for this girl. |
| 3 · Time | Poor time management | Spends five minutes on confidentiality law; the actual options, the instructions and ongoing contraception are squeezed into the last minute. |
| 4 · Findings | Abnormal findings or results, or their implications, not identified | Does not use the record — no oral steroids for the asthma, weight 56 kg — or does not ask the date of the last period, so cannot say where in the cycle she is or why ulipristal is first-line. |
| 5 · Examination | Physical examination or use of instruments not competent | Not an examination station — the equivalent failure is not asking the questions that change the choice: other sex this cycle, a condom that slipped, enzyme-inducing medicines, vomiting, weight; or not assessing competence before prescribing. |
| 6 · Diagnosis | Working diagnosis or differential diagnoses not correct | No formulation: cannot say whether she is competent or why, or why disclosure is not required here; “she’s under 16, so I have to tell someone”; or prescribes levonorgestrel without knowing that ulipristal or the coil would be more effective at this point in the cycle. |
| 7 · Management | Management plan not reflecting current best practice | “Take this” with nothing about vomiting, condoms for the rest of the cycle, when to do a pregnancy test, ongoing contraception or infection testing; follow-up not booked; the supervising GP not told; nothing recorded about competence or safeguarding. |
| 8 · Rapport | Rapport and sensitivity to the patient’s feelings and concerns not shown | Judgemental tone — “you’re too young for this”; or over-familiar; does not acknowledge how frightened she is of pregnancy and of her mother. |
| 9 · Listening | Verbal and non-verbal cues not used; poor active listening | Misses “Will this go on my record?”, “It’s not like he’s some older bloke” and “My friend said there’s something that works better than the pill”; never invites her to add anything, so the second episode six days ago is never heard. |
| 10 · Language | Language or explanations not understandable; understanding not checked | “You’re Fraser-competent, so I can give you UPA; we’ll do NAATs for chlamydia and gonorrhoea and quick-start LARC after five days.” |
5 · Examiner points of fact and guidelines
Points of fact the examiner should have to hand
- FSRH/CoSRH Clinical Guideline: Emergency Contraception (March 2017, amended April 2026; the Faculty is now the College of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare): the copper IUD is the most effective method; it can be inserted up to 5 days after the first unprotected sex in a cycle, or up to 5 days after the earliest likely date of ovulation, whichever is later. Ulipristal acetate 30 mg is effective up to 120 hours after unprotected sex and is more effective than levonorgestrel; levonorgestrel 1.5 mg is licensed to 72 hours and the evidence suggests it is ineffective beyond 96 hours. Oral emergency contraception taken after ovulation is ineffective. Consider ulipristal first-line when the sex is likely to have been in the 5 days before ovulation, or was 96–120 hours ago.
- Weight, drugs and other cautions (same guideline): levonorgestrel may be less effective if BMI is over 26 kg/m² or weight over 70 kg — give ulipristal or a double dose (3 mg) of levonorgestrel. With an enzyme-inducing drug offer the copper IUD, or levonorgestrel 3 mg (effectiveness unknown); a double dose of ulipristal is not recommended. A progestogen taken in the 5 days after ulipristal reduces its effect, so hormonal contraception is not started until 5 days after ulipristal (it can be started immediately after levonorgestrel); progestogen in the 7 days before ulipristal may theoretically reduce its effect. Ulipristal is not suitable for women with severe asthma controlled by oral glucocorticoids. Repeat the dose if vomiting occurs within 3 hours. Both oral methods can be used more than once in a cycle. The April 2026 amendment: no interruption of breastfeeding is needed after a single dose of ulipristal, and higher BMI is associated with a higher risk of IUD expulsion.
- What every emergency-contraception consultation includes (FSRH/CoSRH; NICE CKS Contraception — emergency, last revised October 2025): advice that oral emergency contraception gives no cover for later sex in the cycle; information on all methods of ongoing contraception and how to start them (quick start immediately after levonorgestrel, from day 5 after ulipristal); an STI risk assessment with testing offered; and a follow-up pregnancy test if there is no normal period within 3 weeks. Antibiotic cover may be considered at IUD insertion if the STI risk is high.
- Age of consent and the law: the age of consent to sexual activity is 16 throughout the UK (Sexual Offences Act 2003 in England and Wales, with equivalent legislation elsewhere); sexual activity under 16 is an offence even if both agree; children under 13 are in law unable to consent, so sexual intercourse with a child under 13 is rape (CKS; Sexual Offences Act 2003 s5 — rape of a child under 13, with ss5–8 covering under-13s — and s9 where the other person is 18 or over, and s13 where, as with Ethan at 17, the other person is under 18 — sexual activity with a child under 16). Unlawfulness alone does not oblige disclosure — the question is harm, risk and capacity.
- GMC, 0–18 years: guidance for all doctors (in force since 2007; updated 2018 and December 2024): paragraph 63 — you can provide contraceptive, abortion and STI advice and treatment to a young person under 16 without parental knowledge or consent if they understand all aspects of the advice and its implications; you cannot persuade them to tell their parents or let you do so; they are very likely to have sex with or without treatment; their physical or mental health is likely to suffer otherwise; and it is in their best interests. Paragraph 64 — keep the consultation confidential even if you decide not to treat, other than in the exceptional circumstances in paragraphs 46–52 and 57–62. These are the Fraser criteria from Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA (1985); “Gillick competence” is the general test of a child’s capacity to consent, and the Fraser guidelines are its application to contraceptive advice. In Scotland the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991 applies a similar test.
- Capacity in the under-16s (GMC 0–18, paragraphs 24–26): a young person can consent only if they can understand the nature, purpose and possible consequences of the treatment and of not having it, retain and weigh the information, and communicate a decision; capacity depends more on maturity and understanding than on age, is decision-specific, and must be assessed and recorded for this decision. At 16 capacity is presumed.
- When information should be shared (GMC 0–18, paragraphs 57–62): a confidential sexual health service is essential for young people’s welfare and fear about confidentiality is the biggest deterrent to seeking help (57); disclose when it is in the public interest or to protect a child from abusive or seriously harmful sexual activity (58); consider each case on its merits (59); you should usually share information about sexual activity involving children under 13, who are considered in law unable to consent — and discuss any decision not to with the named or designated safeguarding professional and record it (60); and usually share information about abusive or seriously harmful sexual activity, including a young person too immature to understand or consent, big differences in age, maturity or power, a partner in a position of trust, force, pressure, bribery or payment, drugs or alcohol used to secure sex, or a partner known to the police or child protection agencies as having abused children (61). You may not be able to judge this without knowing who the partner is — balance the benefit of asking against the loss of trust (62). None of these applies to Mia.
- Child sexual exploitation screen (Department for Education, Child sexual exploitation: definition and guide for practitioners, 2017; Working Together to Safeguard Children, 2026): exploitation is sexual activity in exchange for something the child needs or wants — money, gifts, drugs, alcohol, affection, status, protection — or for the benefit of a third party, with or without the child’s apparent consent. Ask routinely about an older partner, gifts and money, drugs and alcohol, online contacts, going missing, care status and whether she feels safe. Any concern goes to the practice safeguarding lead the same day; an FY2 never carries it alone.
- Records and access: a parent with proxy access to a child’s online record may be able to see what is recorded unless the entry is marked confidential or the access has been reviewed — the practice should check Mia’s proxy-access status today (NHS England guidance on proxy access for children and young people sets the review ages; confirm the current wording before quoting it). Record the competence assessment, the safeguarding questions and answers, and the plan — the record is both her protection and yours. Emergency contraception is free from NHS sexual health clinics and GP practices and, under local and national pharmacy schemes, from community pharmacies; confirm the current conditions of the pharmacy service locally before quoting them.
- Testing (CKS; BASHH): offer chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing by NAAT on a self-taken vulvovaginal swab, with repeat testing after the window period, and HIV and syphilis serology via the sexual health clinic with repeat testing after their longer windows (the current BASHH window periods should be confirmed before quoting figures); partner testing encouraged. A young person under 16 can consent to STI testing and treatment on the same basis as to contraception (GMC 0–18, paragraph 63).
Where candidates lose marks at this station
- “I’ll have to tell your mum.”
- “I promise I won’t tell anyone, whatever you say.”
- Levonorgestrel by reflex — ulipristal and the coil never mentioned.
- No question about other sex this cycle or a condom that slipped.
- The tablet handed over with nothing about vomiting, the rest of the month, a pregnancy test or what comes next.
- Safeguarding questions fired as an accusation — or not asked at all.
Guidelines for this station
- FSRH/CoSRH Clinical Guideline — Emergency Contraception (March 2017, amended April 2026)
- NICE CKS — Contraception: emergency (revised October 2025)
- GMC — 0–18 years: contraception, abortion and STIs (paragraphs 63–65)
- GMC — 0–18 years: sexual activity (paragraphs 57–62)
- GMC — 0–18 years: assessing the capacity to consent (paragraphs 24–28)
- Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 9 — sexual activity with a child (offender 18 or over)
- Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 13 — child sex offences committed by children or young persons
- GOV.UK — Child sexual exploitation: definition and guide for practitioners (DfE, 2017)
- GOV.UK — Working Together to Safeguard Children
6 · MLA content map tags for this case
| MLA content map | This station |
|---|---|
| Domain 1 · Areas of clinical practice | Sexual health · Obstetrics and gynaecology |
| Domain 3 · Clinical and professional capabilities | Capacity, consent and confidentiality · Safeguarding vulnerable patients · Legal and ethical responsibilities · Communication with patients, relatives and carers · Health promotion and disease prevention |
| Domain 5 · Patient presentations | Contraception request/ advice · Unintended pregnancy and termination |
| Domain 6 · Conditions | Chlamydia |
| Station family | Explanation, counselling and breaking bad news — Explanation and counselling — a young person’s request |
7 · My marks and reflection — practice log form
Record your three domain marks, your station total, the GMC feedback statements that applied (where underperformance was identified), and what you will keep and change. The form is already labelled with this case and its web address; a copy of your entry is emailed to you, so your practice log builds up in your inbox and can be downloaded.
Record my marks and reflection for P2-32
Revision link for this case: mdacumen.com/plab-2-osce/case-32-emergency-contraception-at-fifteen
Independence & scope. Independent, formative training material from MD Acumen Ltd. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or delivered on behalf of the General Medical Council. The GMC does not publish its station mark sheets: every mark scheme and descriptor on these pages is an Acumen training tool calibrated to the GMC's published marking domains, feedback statements and the MLA content map. Practice scores are not a prediction of examination performance. Clinical content reflects UK guidance at the date of editorial review — always check the current guideline. All patients are fictional. This course never provides, and will never ask you to share, real GMC exam content — full regulatory statement: Legal & Regulatory.

© 2026 MD Acumen Ltd · Registered in England and Wales · Company no. 16538952 · ICO registration ZC105897