MD Acumen · PLAB 2 OSCE / CPSA course · free practice resources
Practice case P2-34 · Face-to-face · simulated patient

“I just wanted it all to stop” — a young woman in the emergency department

A 22-year-old woman has been brought to the emergency department by her flatmate at nine in the morning. The triage note says she took “a lot of tablets” during the night. Her observations are normal and she is asking to go home.

Reviewed and kept current

Station family: Acute care — assessment in the emergency department · 8-minute station · 1 min 30 s reading · Last editorial review: 16 October 2026 · Next scheduled refresh: 11 April 2027.

Candidate instructions

Read this as you would outside the room

You have 1 minute 30 seconds to read, then 8 minutes. Candidates: everything below this section is folded away — leave it closed until you have finished the station.

Information
Your roleFoundation Year 2 doctor in the emergency department. The ED registrar is available; the mental health liaison team is on site and can be called. TOXBASE is open on the computer.
PatientMs Jade Fenwick, 22, trainee veterinary nurse
Triage note (09:05)“Brought in by flatmate. Says she took ‘a lot of tablets’ at home during the night after an argument with her partner. Tearful. Wants to go home. Flatmate has gone to move the car.”
ObservationsPulse 92, BP 118/72, respiratory rate 16, SpO₂ 99% on air, temperature 36.8 °C, GCS 15, capillary glucose 5.4 mmol/L. Weight 60 kg. Bloods have been taken and sent; results are not back.
RecordsNo previous attendances. Registered with a GP; no regular medication; no known allergies. No mental health history on the shared record.

Your task

•
Find out what she has taken, how much and when.
•
Assess her mental state and her safety.
•
Explain what treatment you advise and why, and agree the next steps with her. You are not required to examine her; results will be given if you ask.
Folded away

For the actor and the examiner

1 · Actor script — role player only

Candidates: do not open until you have consulted.

Persona and manner

  • Jade Fenwick, 22, a trainee veterinary nurse in her second year at the vet practice. You share a flat with Sophie, your best friend from school. You have been with your partner Kieran for three years; he moved in six months ago.
  • You sit on the edge of the trolley with your coat on and your bag on your lap. Tearful, flat, ashamed; you answer in short sentences and look at the floor. You warm up only if the doctor is calm, unhurried and does not judge.

Opening line — say this verbatim

  • “I’m fine now. I just want to go home — Sophie shouldn’t have brought me. Can I go?”

Volunteer freely if given the space

  • You and Kieran had a huge row last night — he said he was leaving. He walked out at about ten.
  • You took “a load of paracetamol” from the bathroom cabinet. You did not count them.
  • You feel sick and your stomach hurts a bit. You have not vomited.

Only if asked

  • What and how much: two boxes of 16 paracetamol 500 mg tablets, bought from the supermarket at different times — “most of them, I think; maybe 28 or 30”. The boxes are at home.
  • When — the important detail: not all at once. “Some about half ten, more at about one, and the last ones about three when I still couldn’t sleep.” So over about four and a half hours. If the doctor asks only “what time did you take them?” say “last night” and wait for a more specific question.
  • Anything else — only if asked about other tablets, alcohol or drugs: half a bottle of wine during the row, before the tablets — nothing since. No other medicines. No illegal drugs. Sophie’s sleeping tablets: keep this for the ‘anything to add’ moment unless the doctor asks specifically whether you took anything belonging to anyone else, or anything from Sophie’s room.
  • Intent: “I wasn’t thinking about dying. I wanted it all to stop — the row, the noise in my head.” You did not write a note, did not tell anyone, and did not plan it beforehand — you took what was there. You thought you would just sleep. This morning you feel stupid and frightened about what the tablets might have done.
  • Now: if asked directly whether you still want to die or hurt yourself: “No. I don’t think so. I don’t know.” You cannot promise it will not happen again if Kieran leaves. You have no plan.
  • Before: you have never done anything like this. You cut your arms a few times at fifteen, when your parents split up. Never seen anyone about it. No diagnosis, no medication, no counselling.
  • Mood over the last few weeks: low since the summer, sleeping badly, not enjoying work, crying easily. Eating less. Still going to work.
  • Kieran — only if asked about the relationship, feeling safe at home, or whether anyone frightens or hurts you: he shouts and has thrown things, never at you; he checks your phone and does not like you going out with Sophie. He has never hit you. “It’s not like that.” You do not want him contacted.
  • Family: your mum, Tracey, lives an hour away. You do not want her told — “she’ll panic, and she’ll tell everyone”. Your dad is not in touch.
  • Physical: no vomiting, no jaundice, no previous liver problems, not pregnant (period ten days ago; you use the pill). No allergies.
  • Capacity — how to play it: you understand when things are explained plainly, you can repeat them back, and you can give reasons for your choices. You are not confused. Your refusal at the start is about wanting the night to be over and fear of being “sectioned”, not about failing to understand.

Impact on daily life — home and work (only if asked)

  • You have a clinic list at eleven and your practice manager, who has given you a chance, will be furious; you are frightened of losing the place at the practice.
  • Money is tight — Kieran pays most of the rent, which is part of why you cannot imagine him leaving.
  • You have stopped seeing friends apart from Sophie because Kieran does not like it.

Ideas, concerns and expectations

  • Idea: you thought paracetamol was “harmless, it’s just paracetamol” — you feel all right now, so it must be fine.
  • Concerns: that you will be sectioned or locked up; that your mum will find out; that your practice manager will find out and you will lose your job; and, once the doctor explains, what the tablets have done to your liver.
  • Expectation: to be allowed to go home; a doctor who will not lecture you.

Cues to deliver, timed

  • Minute 2: “Am I going to be sectioned? Sophie said they section you for this.”
  • Minute 4, if the doctor has not yet asked exactly when you took the tablets: “Does it matter that I didn’t take them all together?”
  • Minute 6, if nothing has been said about the drip or the antidote: “So can I go, then? I feel fine.”

If the doctor summarises and asks whether you want to add anything

  • If it has not come out: “There is something. I took a few of Sophie’s sleeping tablets as well — about four, from her drawer. I don’t know what they’re called. Is that bad?”
  • If it has: “You won’t tell my mum, will you?”

How to respond to the doctor

  • If the doctor is calm, sits down, and asks what happened before asking what you took: you tell the story. If the doctor fires closed questions from a checklist (“any suicidal ideation?”): short answers and “I don’t know”.
  • If the doctor explains honestly that paracetamol can damage the liver even when you feel well, that the damage shows up later, that there is an antidote drip which works best early, and that because the tablets were spread out they will not wait for a blood level: frightened — “I didn’t know that” — then: “OK. I’ll have the drip.” You agree to stay.
  • If the doctor says a blood test will tell them whether you need treatment and you can go if it is normal: you accept it gladly. (The examiner marks this.)
  • If the doctor says “you could die”, “you will be sectioned” or “we can detain you”: you shut down — “Then I’m going.” You stand up. If the doctor then recovers — sits down, apologises, explains properly — you sit back down.
  • If the doctor says you need treatment before you can go, or asks you to stay: “No — I’ve decided. I’m going home.” Keep to that until the doctor has explained the liver risk and the antidote in plain words, then: “OK. I’ll have the drip.” If the doctor explains that you can only be treated with your agreement, that you have the right to refuse if you understand what that means, and asks what you understand: you engage and ask sensible questions — “What would happen to my liver?” — and then agree.
  • If the doctor asks directly whether anyone at home frightens, controls or hurts you: you cry and tell the doctor about the phone and the shouting. If the doctor then says the word “abuse” before you do: “It’s not like that — he’s never hit me.” If the doctor offers information and a choice, without pushing: you take the leaflet.
  • If the doctor says someone from the mental health team will come to talk to you here, today, before any decision about going home, and explains what that is for: “Will they section me?” If answered honestly — it is an assessment and a conversation, not a sectioning: “OK.”
  • If the doctor says your mum must be told: “No. I’m 22. You can’t.” If the doctor accepts that and gently asks who you would like to know: “Sophie. Just Sophie.”
  • If jargon is used (“NAC”, “SNAP”, “staggered”, “psychosocial assessment”): “What does that mean?”

Do not

  • Volunteer the sleeping tablets, the times of ingestion, the wine, Kieran’s behaviour or your mood unless asked as scripted, or invited to add anything (apart from the timed cues).
  • Say “overdose”, “staggered” or “liver” before the doctor does.
  • Agree to the drip until the doctor has explained what it is for.

Findings to give the candidate — only if asked for

Give these only if the candidate asks for examination findings, results or an ECG. Do not interpret them — if asked “is that high?” say “that’s the number, doctor”. (Where a separate examiner is present, the examiner reads them.)

Examination (if asked): alert, tearful, no smell of alcohol now; abdomen soft, mild epigastric tenderness, no jaundice; no injuries; pupils normal; speech normal. Bloods (if asked, “just back”): paracetamol 42 mg/L at 09:10; ALT 38 U/L (less than 40); INR 1.0; creatinine 64 micromol/L; bicarbonate 24 mmol/L; venous pH 7.38; ethanol not detected. Salicylate: not detected. ECG (if asked): sinus rhythm 90, QRS 88 ms, QTc 410 ms.

2 · Examiner mark sheet — generic scheme plus the key facts for this case

Domain marks — with the key facts that earn a 4 at this station

Domain (GMC wording) · key facts for this case1234Score
1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skills
  • What, how much, when — establishes a staggered ingestion (about 30 × 500 mg = 250 mg/kg over 4½ hours, 22:30–03:00); alcohol; other tablets — the flatmate’s sleeping tablets
  • Intent and circumstances: trigger, no note or planning, told no one, what she expected; now — thoughts of dying, plan, regret; self-harm at 15; months of low mood
  • Red flags: vomiting, abdominal pain, jaundice; asks about safety at home — the controlling, intimidating partner; who she lives with; who she would like contacted
  • ICE (“just paracetamol”; fears being sectioned, her mum and her manager finding out) and impact — her job, money, isolation from friends
☐☐☐☐/4
2 · Clinical management skills
  • Summary and check, then the working diagnosis: staggered paracetamol self-poisoning with a sedative co-ingestant after a relationship crisis; months of low mood; coercive control — not planned, not intoxication
  • Acetylcysteine started without waiting for a level (staggered ingestion); TOXBASE checked for the regimen (12-hour SNAP locally) and the sleeping tablet; level, LFT, INR, U&E, gas, glucose
  • Capacity assessed for this decision and documented; treatment by consent; mental health liaison referral now, not after the drip; safeguarding and domestic abuse pathway offered; registrar informed
  • Safety-net: vomiting, abdominal pain, confusion or a rash on the drip → nurse at once; thoughts of self-harm or wanting to leave → tell staff; after discharge → crisis line or 999 · Follow-up: liaison assessment today; bloods at end of infusion; GP letter; safety plan
☐☐☐☐/4
3 · Interpersonal skills
  • Sits down, no judgement — “what happened last night?” before “what did you take?”
  • Honest about the liver without threats; answers the sectioning question plainly
  • Respects her confidentiality as an adult with capacity; negotiates who is told
  • Asks about Kieran kindly and directly; takes “it’s not like that” without arguing; offers, does not push
☐☐☐☐/4
Station total/12

Domain score (educational construct):

ScoreDescriptor
1Unsatisfactory (did not achieve safe FY2 standard)
2Borderline (just achieving minimum safe FY2 standard)
3Satisfactory (competent and safe FY2 standard)
4Good (exceeds FY2 standard)

This 1–4 domain score and its descriptors are an Acumen educational construct: the GMC publishes the three marking domains and the four-mark maximum, but not the descriptors its examiners use, and it does not publish station mark sheets. See Legal & Regulatory.

Marks are 1 to 4 in each domain; the generic descriptor for each mark is on the mark scheme page, and the structure of the eight minutes is on the 8-minute station page. The full standard for this case is in section 3 and the GMC feedback statements, with examples from this case, are in section 4. The examination findings that the role player gives — only if the candidate asks for them — are at the end of section 1.

3 · Expanded station-specific marking standard — what earns 4, 3, 2 and 1 here

The top row is the full picture of what a competent FY2 could do at this station, including the working diagnosis with its justified differentials, the safety-net and the follow-up; lower rows describe how performance falls away. It is a debriefing aid, not a checklist to recite: nobody says every line in eight minutes, and a 4 is a judgement that the essentials — the italic key facts on the mark sheet — were done well, in plain language and at the patient’s pace. Acumen training standard — the GMC does not publish station mark sheets.

MarkDomain 1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skillsDomain 2 · Clinical management skillsDomain 3 · Interpersonal skills
4
  • Introduces self, sits down at her level, and acknowledges that she wants to go home before asking anything else; opens with what happened, not with a tally of tablets
  • The poisoning history: which drug (paracetamol 500 mg, two supermarket boxes of 16), how many (28–30, about 250 mg/kg), and exactly when — asks whether they were taken all at once and establishes a staggered ingestion from 22:30 to 03:00; what else — alcohol (half a bottle of wine) and other tablets, including anyone else’s (the flatmate’s sleeping tablets); whether she vomited; the empty boxes
  • Physical risk: nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, jaundice, confusion; previous liver disease, regular medicines, pregnancy; asks for the observations, examination findings, bloods and ECG
  • The self-harm history in the person’s own words: the trigger, what she wanted to happen, planning, a note, precautions against being found, telling anyone, alcohol, how she feels about it now, current thoughts of dying or harming herself, any plan; credit if offered: previous self-harm (cutting at 15), mental health contact; mood, sleep, appetite, enjoyment, work over the last months; drugs
  • Safety and safeguarding: who she lives with; asks directly and kindly whether anyone at home frightens, controls or hurts her — hears about the shouting, the thrown objects and the phone checking; dependants (none); who she wants contacted
  • Red flags: physical (vomiting, pain, jaundice, co-ingestants, unknown drug), and psychological (persisting intent, a plan, hopelessness, isolation, an abusive relationship)
  • ICE: ‘it’s just paracetamol’; fears being sectioned and her mother or manager finding out; expects to go home. Impact on daily living: the eleven o’clock clinic list and her place at the practice, money, friends cut off
  • Summarises what she has told you and checks whether she wants to add anything — which is when the sleeping tablets come out if they have not already
  • Working diagnosis with justified differentials: staggered paracetamol self-poisoning (about 250 mg/kg over four and a half hours) with alcohol and an unidentified sedative co-ingestant, in the context of a relationship crisis, several months of low mood and a controlling partner. Impulsive, with no planning and regret this morning — but ambivalent and with risk factors that do not resolve by discharge; not a feigned or trivial ingestion (the boxes are nearly empty); not simple intoxication (ethanol not detected, GCS 15); depression possible and for the mental health team to assess
  • Treatment: because the ingestion was staggered over more than an hour, the paracetamol level cannot be interpreted on the nomogram and acetylcysteine is started without waiting for it (MHRA 2012; TOXBASE); the level, LFT, INR, U&E, bicarbonate, glucose and a gas are still sent as a baseline; checks TOXBASE for the regimen the department uses — the 12-hour SNAP regimen (100 mg/kg over 2 hours, then 200 mg/kg over 10 hours) recommended by the National Poisons Information Service and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, or the licensed 21-hour regimen — and for the sleeping tablet once it is identified; warns her about anaphylactoid reactions and what to do
  • Capacity: presumes capacity (Mental Capacity Act 2005, s1), and when she refuses treatment assesses it for this decision — can she understand the information (silent liver damage, an antidote that works best early), retain it, weigh it, and communicate a decision — and records the assessment. Explains honestly that an adult with capacity can refuse, and that staff would seek senior and liaison advice rather than treat her against her will; does not threaten detention. Treatment proceeds by consent once she agrees
  • Mental health: refers to the liaison psychiatry team now for a psychosocial assessment in the department — not delayed until the infusion ends (NICE NG225 1.5.2, 1.7.13); does not use a risk score to decide anything (1.6.1–1.6.4); tells the ED registrar. Credit if offered, not required for a 4: agrees an observation level with the nurse in charge; removes the means — with her consent, asks Sophie to bring in the sleeping-tablet packet and to remove the remaining tablets from the flat
  • Confidentiality and safeguarding: respects her decision that her mother is not told; involves Sophie with her consent; recognises the partner’s behaviour as possible coercive control, offers information and a route to support (independent domestic violence adviser, national helpline) and documents it; credit if offered: asks about any children in the household (none)
  • Explains the plan in plain words — the drip and how long, the blood tests at the end, who will come to talk to her and why, that going home is decided after both — and the safety-net. Credit if offered, not required for a 4: a fit note for work; the flatmate’s drawer; that paracetamol in small packs is exactly because of this harm
  • Safety-net: while in the department — nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, confusion or drowsiness, or flushing, itching, wheeze or a rash during the infusion → the nurse immediately (the infusion is paused and restarted more slowly for a reaction); any return of thoughts of harming herself, or wanting to leave → tell staff, who will stay with her; after discharge — if she takes anything again or cannot keep herself safe → 999 or the emergency department, the crisis line number from the mental health team, or NHS 111 (mental-health option, 24/7).
  • Follow-up: liaison psychiatry (or the equivalent mental health professional) sees her in the department today, before any decision about discharge, for a psychosocial assessment and a written safety plan agreed with her; bloods — paracetamol, LFT, INR, U&E, bicarbonate — repeated at the end of the acetylcysteine infusion (and the infusion continued if ALT or INR are abnormal, per TOXBASE); the ED registrar informed and the admission to the observation ward documented; the sleeping tablet identified from the flatmate and checked on TOXBASE; a GP letter with the attendance, the drugs taken and the mental health plan; domestic abuse support details given and a referral offered, with her consent; the FY2 documents the capacity assessment, what she was told and what she decided.
  • Sits down, takes off the urgency: “you’re safe here; tell me what happened last night” — before any question about tablets
  • No lecture, no “why did you do it?” in a reproachful tone; uses her words (“wanted it all to stop”)
  • Answers “am I going to be sectioned?” honestly and at once — no, and what will happen instead
  • Explains the liver and the antidote plainly, without threats, and checks what she has understood
  • Respects her as an adult: her mother is not told; asks who she wants involved
  • Asks about Kieran with warmth and without labelling; accepts “it’s not like that” and leaves the door open
3Drug, dose and the staggered timing established, intent and current thoughts explored, mood and previous self-harm covered; one of the co-ingestant question, the safety-at-home question, the physical red flags or ICE and impact missing.Acetylcysteine started on the staggered history without waiting for a level, capacity considered and treatment by consent, liaison referral made today and the home situation acknowledged; one of the co-ingestant plan, the confidentiality negotiation or the domestic abuse signposting missing.Kind and clear; one cue missed, or the domestic abuse question asked a little clumsily.
2Counts tablets and asks “any suicidal thoughts?” but does not establish the timing or ask about other drugs or alcohol; mood and home situation barely touched.Treatment offered but made conditional on the 4-hour level, or the staggered timing not used; capacity asserted (“she has capacity”) without assessment; liaison “after the drip”; safeguarding not raised.Pleasant but checklist-driven; the sectioning fear not answered until she asks twice; some jargon.
1A few closed questions; the history is of the paracetamol only; nothing about intent, safety or what she wants. Or unsafe: does not establish what she took or when; or accepts “I’m fine” and starts discharge paperwork.Plans to discharge if the level is normal; no mental health referral; no safety-net. Or unsafe: lets her leave without assessing capacity, risk or arranging any follow-up; or restrains or threatens to section a woman with capacity; or tells her mother against her wishes; or dismisses the ingestion because she feels well.Hurried, judgemental or frightening; she shuts down. Or unsafe: threatens her, mocks the “harmless” belief, or discusses her with the flatmate or her mother without consent.
4 · GMC feedback statements — where underperformance was identified — with case-specific examples

A feedback statement marks where underperformance was identified in the consultation. With PLAB 2 results the GMC may attach any combination of the ten statements to a station — none, one or several. The right-hand column shows what each one looks like at this station. Record the statements that applied in the practice log.

GMC feedback statementUnderperformance it signals (generic)Case-specific examples
1 · ConsultationDisorganised or unstructured consultationStarts with a drug tally and a risk checklist; the story of the night, the timing and her fears come out in no order; no summary before the plan.
2 · IssuesKey issues or priorities not recognisedTreats it as “paracetamol level at four hours” and never recognises that the task is a staggered overdose in a woman who wants to leave — treatment, capacity, risk and safety together.
3 · TimePoor time managementFive minutes on the relationship; the acetylcysteine and the liaison referral are never mentioned.
4 · FindingsAbnormal findings or results, or their implications, not identifiedDoes not use the observations and weight on the sheet (250 mg/kg); asks for the paracetamol level and treats 42 mg/L as “low, so no treatment”; misses that the ingestion was spread over four and a half hours or that there was a second drug.
5 · ExaminationPhysical examination or use of instruments not competentDoes not ask for examination findings, bloods, an ECG or a pregnancy status; does not ask about vomiting or abdominal pain.
6 · DiagnosisWorking diagnosis or differential diagnoses not correct“She’s taken an overdose and she’s low” — no formulation; cannot say why this is a staggered poisoning needing treatment regardless of the level, or why capacity has to be assessed for this decision.
7 · ManagementManagement plan not reflecting current best practiceWaits for the level before starting the antidote; “if the bloods are normal you can go”; capacity assumed or ignored; liaison referral deferred until the drip is finished; nothing about Kieran; no safety plan; nothing said about what to do if the thoughts come back.
8 · RapportRapport and sensitivity to the patient’s feelings and concerns not shownLectures her about paracetamol; says “we can section you” when she stands up; talks about her mother being informed as if it were decided.
9 · ListeningVerbal and non-verbal cues not used; poor active listeningMisses “am I going to be sectioned?” and “does it matter that I didn’t take them all together?”; never invites her to add anything, so the sleeping tablets stay hidden.
10 · LanguageLanguage or explanations not understandable; understanding not checked“It’s a staggered OD so we’ll give NAC on the SNAP regimen; liaison will do a psychosocial, and we’ll need to think about MCA if she refuses.”
5 · Examiner points of fact and guidelines

Points of fact the examiner should have to hand

  1. Paracetamol toxicity and the single treatment line (MHRA / Commission on Human Medicines, September 2012; BNF, poisoning): acetylcysteine is given to anyone whose timed plasma paracetamol concentration is on or above the line joining 100 mg/L at 4 hours and 15 mg/L at 15 hours after a single acute ingestion, whatever their risk factors — the second ‘high-risk’ line was removed in 2012. A level taken before 4 hours cannot be interpreted. Staggered or uncertain-time ingestion (tablets taken over one hour or more, or a time that cannot be established): the nomogram does not apply and acetylcysteine is started without waiting for a level; the level, LFT, INR, U&E and bicarbonate are still sent. TOXBASE gives a weight-based threshold below which treatment is unlikely to be needed for staggered ingestion (around 75 mg/kg in 24 hours — check the live TOXBASE entry); at 250 mg/kg she is well above it.
  2. Dose taken: 30 tablets × 500 mg = 15 g; at 60 kg that is 250 mg/kg. TOXBASE gives thresholds for serious toxicity (around 150 mg/kg in 24 hours, rarely between 75 and 150 mg/kg — check the live TOXBASE entry). Toxic doses are calculated on actual body weight up to a ceiling of 110 kg (BNF). Alcohol taken acutely with the paracetamol does not change the treatment line.
  3. Acetylcysteine regimens (BNF; TOXBASE): the licensed 21-hour regimen — 150 mg/kg over 1 hour, then 50 mg/kg over 4 hours, then 100 mg/kg over 16 hours (the first infusion was lengthened from 15 minutes to 1 hour in 2012 to reduce reactions); the 12-hour SNAP regimen — 100 mg/kg over 2 hours, then 200 mg/kg over 10 hours — which the BNF now lists, which TOXBASE and the National Poisons Information Service recommend and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (May 2023) asks to be the default in emergency departments, with fewer reactions (antihistamine needed for a reaction in 2.0% vs 11.0% in a 2019 three-centre UK evaluation of 3,340 patients, with no difference in liver injury) and the same protection; it remains unlicensed (MHRA position 2017, that evidence was then insufficient to recommend it; the BNF says SNAP is not endorsed by the MHRA but is recommended by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and the National Poisons Information Service, and TOXBASE advises it; the 2019 evaluation is Pettie et al., EClinicalMedicine). Bloods (paracetamol, ALT, INR, creatinine, bicarbonate) are taken at or just before the end of the second bag, and a further 200 mg/kg over 10 hours is given if ALT or INR are abnormal or paracetamol is still detectable — the department’s TOXBASE-based protocol gives the exact criteria. Glucose 5% is the usual diluent.
  4. Anaphylactoid reactions (BNF; MHRA 2012): flushing, itching, urticaria, wheeze or hypotension, usually during the first bag — pause the infusion, treat (antihistamine, bronchodilator as needed) and restart at a slower rate; a previous reaction is not a contraindication, because the reaction is dose-related and not immune-mediated. Acetylcysteine may slightly raise the INR.
  5. Co-ingestants: every other drug taken is checked on TOXBASE — here an unidentified ‘sleeping tablet’ (a benzodiazepine or Z-drug is most likely: supportive care, observation of conscious level and respiratory rate; flumazenil is not used routinely in mixed overdose). The flatmate is asked to bring the packet. An ECG is taken in any overdose where a cardiotoxic drug is possible.
  6. NICE NG225 Self-harm: assessment, management and preventing recurrence (September 2022): physical and psychosocial care run concurrently (1.7.3); in the emergency department, establish at triage the severity, emotional state, immediate safety, safeguarding concerns, willingness to accept treatment, the observation level and any care plan (1.7.12); offer referral to liaison psychiatry as soon as possible after arrival (1.7.13) and a mental health professional sees the person at every attendance (1.7.14); do not delay the psychosocial assessment until medical treatment is complete (1.5.2) and do not use breath or blood alcohol to delay it (1.5.4); do not use risk assessment tools or low/medium/high stratification to predict repetition or to decide treatment or discharge (1.6.1–1.6.4) — a mental health professional makes a risk formulation (1.6.6); if the person wants to leave before assessment, assess their safety and mental health before they go (1.5.14); do not use mechanical restraint to stop someone leaving (1.7.18). First aid for self-poisoning follows the BNF, TOXBASE and the NPIS (1.7.4).
  7. Capacity (Mental Capacity Act 2005, ss 1–3; NG225 1.2.1, 1.7.1): presume capacity; a person is not treated as lacking capacity merely because the decision is unwise; capacity is decision-specific and time-specific — assessed for this treatment, now. The functional test: can she understand the information relevant to the decision, retain it long enough, use or weigh it, and communicate the decision; the diagnostic limb is an impairment of, or disturbance in, the functioning of the mind or brain (intoxication, severe distress or depression can qualify, but do not automatically). Where an adult has capacity and refuses, treatment cannot be given against her will; the right response is time, honest information, senior and liaison involvement, and documentation. Where capacity is lacking, treatment in her best interests may be given under s5 of the Act using the least restrictive option. The Mental Health Act 1983 (amended by the Mental Health Act 2025, most of whose reforms are not yet in force) is not a route to treat the overdose in an adult who has capacity; detention needs a mental disorder of a nature or degree that warrants it, assessed by a psychiatrist and an approved mental health professional, not by the FY2. An FY2 assesses and records capacity and involves the registrar and liaison when there is doubt or a refusal.
  8. Confidentiality (GMC, Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information, 2017): an adult with capacity decides who is told — her mother is not informed without consent unless disclosure is needed to protect her or others from a risk of death or serious harm, and even then she is told what will be shared and why. NG225 1.2.2 and 1.4.1: seek consent to involve family and carers early, and remember that they can still give information even when the person has not consented to involvement.
  9. Safeguarding and domestic abuse (NG225 1.3.1; Care Act 2014; Serious Crime Act 2015 s76, controlling or coercive behaviour; Domestic Abuse Act 2021 definition of domestic abuse): ask about domestic abuse, violence or exploitation at the earliest opportunity and when the person is alone; monitoring her phone, isolating her from friends, shouting and throwing things are features of coercive control even without physical violence. Offer information, an independent domestic violence adviser or the National Domestic Abuse Helpline, and a referral with her consent; record it; do not confront or contact the partner. Ask about children in the household — a child would change the duty to act.
  10. Before discharge (NG225 1.5.15–1.5.16; 1.9 discharge; 1.10 aftercare; 1.12 supporting people to be safe): a care plan and a written safety plan agreed with her; the GP informed; means reduced (the paracetamol pack size rule exists because of this harm — 16 tablets over the counter, 32 in pharmacies); a crisis contact number; the mental health team decides the follow-up, not the FY2.

Where candidates lose marks at this station

  • “We’ll check a level at four hours and see” — in a staggered overdose.
  • Asking “what time did you take them?” once and writing down “last night”.
  • Never asking about other tablets, alcohol — or anyone else’s medicines.
  • “If you leave we’ll have to section you.”
  • Saying “she has capacity” (or “she doesn’t”) without assessing it for this decision.
  • Liaison psychiatry “once the drip has finished”.

Guidelines for this station

6 · MLA content map tags for this case
MLA content mapThis station
Domain 1 · Areas of clinical practiceAcute and emergency · Mental health
Domain 3 · Clinical and professional capabilitiesEmergency and acute management plans · Capacity, consent and confidentiality · Safeguarding vulnerable patients · Managing risk · Communication with patients, relatives and carers
Domain 5 · Patient presentationsOverdose · Poisoning · Self-harm · Mental capacity concerns · Domestic abuse
Domain 6 · ConditionsDrug overdose · Self-harm
Station familyAcute care, ethics and safeguarding — Acute care — assessment in the emergency department
7 · My marks and reflection — practice log form

Record your three domain marks, your station total, the GMC feedback statements that applied (where underperformance was identified), and what you will keep and change. The form is already labelled with this case and its web address; a copy of your entry is emailed to you, so your practice log builds up in your inbox and can be downloaded.

Record my marks and reflection for P2-34

Revision link for this case: mdacumen.com/plab-2-osce/case-34-tablets-taken-last-night

Independence & scope. Independent, formative training material from MD Acumen Ltd. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or delivered on behalf of the General Medical Council. The GMC does not publish its station mark sheets: every mark scheme and descriptor on these pages is an Acumen training tool calibrated to the GMC's published marking domains, feedback statements and the MLA content map. Practice scores are not a prediction of examination performance. Clinical content reflects UK guidance at the date of editorial review — always check the current guideline. All patients are fictional. This course never provides, and will never ask you to share, real GMC exam content — full regulatory statement: Legal & Regulatory.